Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1964 Mercury Comet Restoration Rat Rod Project Muscle Car on 2040-cars

US $5,500.00
Year:1964 Mileage:123456 Color: Green /
 Black
Location:

Dearborn Heights, Michigan, United States

Dearborn Heights, Michigan, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Manual
Body Type:Sedan
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:V8 260
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Dealer
VIN: 141B0790432 Year: 1964
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Mercury
Model: Comet
Trim: chrome
Drive Type: left
Mileage: 123,456
Number of Doors: 2
Exterior Color: Green
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Interior Color: Black
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

 1964 Mercury Comet two V8 manual trans with five lug wheels.

Engine            260 V8
Transmission  Three speed manual
Rear axle       Eight inch five lug
Interior          Black cloth (Nice and usable)
Exterior         Fresh Paint  factory color
Wheels         Chrome moonies
Bumpers       Rechromed
This car has been totally dismantled and redone the body restoration is superb and only will have to be wet sanded and wheeled to perfection. The floor pans are original and the frame rails are rust free. In any car the body restoration is far more work than the mechanical aspect so with that being said the hard part is done. There are many new parts along with the old ones I believe the only thing major that is missing is the headliner which I think can be bought new. We acquired this car at an auction the gentleman had put a lot of time in tracking down parts and gathering information there are tubs of many parts I'm sure with some spares to resell. Any questions please call 734 777 2672 out of state buyers will pay tax in there state and Michigan residents will have to pay tax and title transfer.

Auto Services in Michigan

Zoomers Express Care ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 6988 Cooley Lake Rd, Novi
Phone: (734) 453-7773

Wetmore`s Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers
Address: 23459 Woodward Ave, Redford
Phone: (248) 544-2100

Westnedge Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 1116 S Westnedge Ave, Galesburg
Phone: (269) 342-8524

Warren Transmission ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission, Driveshafts
Address: 15851 E Warren Ave, Roseville
Phone: (313) 884-3317

Village Ford ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 23535 Michigan Ave, Garden-City
Phone: (313) 769-2707

Vehicle Accessories ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories
Address: 4424 Wilder Rd, Kawkawlin
Phone: (989) 671-0830

Auto blog

Preposed class-action lawsuit targets 'defective' MyFord Touch

Tue, 16 Jul 2013

A national law firm, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, has filed a proposed class action lawsuit whose presupposition is that MyFord Touch is defective. Specifically, the complaint states that the system - as well as the MyLincoln Touch and MyMercury Touch clones - often freeze, fail to respond to voice or touch commands and have issues connecting to mobile phones.
According to Hagens Berman managing partner Steve Berman, MyFord Touch is a theoretically "brilliant idea" that falls short in actual execution. Said Berman in a press release, "In reality, the system is fundamentally flawed, failing to reliably provide functionality, amounting to an inconvenience at best, and a serious safety issue at worst."
Other MFT issues enumerated within the 41-page filing include problems controlling the window defroster, rear-view camera and navigation system. The suit maintains that Ford is aware of the problem but has yet to submit a workable and acceptable solution to MFT customers. Scroll down if you'd like to read the full press release.

NHTSA upgrades Ford floor mat unintended acceleration probe

Mon, 17 Dec 2012

According to a Bloomberg report, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has upgraded an investigation into complaints of unintended acceleration lodged against Ford vehicles. The investigation began in June of 2010 when just three complaints had been received and it only concerned the Ford Fusion and Mercury Milan, but this was at a time when the phrase "unintended acceleration" made grown men go pale. With 49 additional complaints received since then, the investigation has been reclassified as an engineering analysis - the last phase before a recall - and it has been expanded to include the Lincoln MKZ, making for a total of "around 480,000" units affected between the three sedans from the 2008 to 2010 model years.
The ostensible cause is that floor mats are trapping the accelerator pedal, but according to a Ford statement at the time, the entrapment is due to owners placing the optional all-weather floor mats, or aftermarket floor mats, on top of the car's standard floor mats. NHTSA has backed up that assessment, pinning the blame on "unsecured or double stacked floor mats."
On the face of it, it would appear that NHTSA has upgraded the status not because of Ford's error, but owner error, and Ford has stated publicly that it is "disappointed" in NHTSA's move. On top of NHTSA still being skittish after that other unintended acceleration debacle, it could be seen to be taking its time investigating all of the variables: it's reported that Ford changed its accelerator pedal design in 2010, a "heel blocker" in the floorpan has been considered a potential culprit in how the floor mats could be trapping the pedal, some drivers have said the floor mats weren't anywhere near the pedal, and according to a report in the LA Times, in "a letter sent by Ford to NHTSA in August 2010, the automaker said it found three injuries and one fatality that 'may have resulted from the alleged defect.'"

Ford finds flex-fuel engine design plays big role in emissions output

Mon, Jan 6 2014

How bad is ethanol for your engine? There's been a lot of debate on this issue as the US considers upping the biofuel content in the national gasoline supply from 10 percent (E10) to 15 percent (E15). The ethanol industry and some scientists say higher ethanol blends show no "meaningful differences" in new engines while the oil industry says ethanol creates health risks. Researchers working at the Ford Research and Innovation Center decided to take a closer look at how a wide range of gas-ethanol blends - E0, E10, E20, E30, E40, E55 and E80 - affected the emissions coming out of a flex-fuel 2006 Mercury Grand Marquis. To see the full report, printed in the journal Environmental Science & Technology, requires payment, but there is an abstract and Green Car Congress has some more details. The gist is that, "with increasing ethanol content in the fuel, the tailpipe emissions of ethanol, acetaldehyde, formaldehyde, methane, and ammonia increased." At least NOx and NMHC emissions decreased. The researchers say that the effects are due to the fuel and "are expected for all FFVs," but that the way that a manufacturer calibrates the engine will affect NOx, THC, and NMOG emissions. It's this last bit that's important, since the researchers found, "Higher ethanol content in gasoline affects several fundamental fuel properties that can impact emissions. ... These changes can have positive or negative effects that can depend on engine design, hardware, and control strategy. In addition to direct emissions impacts, higher ethanol content fuel can also provide more efficient combustion and overall engine operation under part-load conditions and under knock-limited higher-load conditions." So, as we head towards more ethanol in our fuel supply (maybe), manufacturers are going to need to learn how to burn it most efficiently.