Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

Glk-class Rwd 4dr Glk350 Glk-class P01 Premium Package, Navigation, Heated Seats on 2040-cars

US $39,449.00
Year:2014 Mileage:8965 Color: Black /
 Black
Location:

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Dealer
Engine:3.5L 3498CC V6 GAS DOHC Naturally Aspirated
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:SUV
Vehicle Title:Clear
Condition:

Certified pre-owned

VIN (Vehicle Identification Number)
: WDCGG5HB8EG282507
Year: 2014
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Side Airbag
Make: Mercedes-Benz
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Windows
Model: GLK-Class
Mileage: 8,965
Sub Model: GLK-Class RWD 4dr GLK350
Doors: 4
Exterior Color: Black
Engine Description: UNSPECIFIED
Interior Color: Black
Trim: Base Sport Utility 4-Door
Number of Cylinders: 6
Drive Type: RWD
Warranty: Vehicle has an existing warranty
Options: Compact Disc

Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class for Sale

Auto Services in North Carolina

Wheel Works ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers
Address: 6300 Robertson Pond Rd, Raleigh
Phone: (919) 365-5500

Vintage & Modern European Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 2809 Indiana Ave Ext, Aberdeen
Phone: (910) 944-1023

Victory Lane Quick Oil Change ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services
Address: 131 Wakelon St, Wendell
Phone: (919) 269-5205

Valvoline Instant Oil Change ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Automotive Tune Up Service
Address: 4417 S 17th St, Leland
Phone: (910) 392-7279

University Ford North ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers, Automobile Leasing
Address: 5331 N Roxboro Rd, Rougemont
Phone: (919) 536-3673

University Auto Imports Inc ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers
Address: 601 W Franklin St, Rtp
Phone: (919) 240-4612

Auto blog

Mercedes S-Class Magic Body Control ad is clucking awesome

Tue, 24 Sep 2013

This is a new ad from Mercedes-Benz. At no point does it show an automobile. Instead, it stars animals, but not the sort you might normally see in car commercial. This ad is all about chickens. It is bizarre, to say the least, with Diana Ross and the Supremes belting it out in the background, but it all kind of comes together when you realize just what Mercedes is hawking (yeah, pun intended).
It's for the manufacturer's Magic Body Control, found on the new S-Class. The system basically analyzes the road and prepares the suspension accordingly, leading to a ride that is, in the words of our own Chris Paukert "nothing short of spooky." You can read about it in our full review of the 2014 S550. Take a look below for the 53-second spot.

Paul di Resta returns to DTM with Mercedes

Tue, 21 Jan 2014

Some drivers manage to make the transition from one form of motor racing into another, and some run into trouble. Take Paul di Resta, for example. The promising young Scottish driver dominated Formula 3 racing in Europe in 2006, then moved over to Germany's hugely competitive DTM touring car series where he finished second in 2008, third in 2009 and first in 2010. But things didn't go as smoothly for Paul - cousin to retired Indy champion Dario Franchitti - when he moved in to Formula One with the Force India team.
In three years on the grid, he failed to score a single podium finish. Little surprise, then, that Force India opted not to renew his contract for this season. Left without a ride, di Resta is now going back to DTM with longtime supporter Mercedes-Benz, testing the new C-Class touring car today in Portugal. It's good news for Mercedes, which is celebrating 120 years in motor racing this season and, with 2005 champion Gary Paffett also on board, can now count two former champions on its DTM roster.
We wouldn't count Paul out of F1 for good, though. When he won the DTM title four years ago, he was also moonlighting as Force India's test driver, and we wouldn't be surprised to see him pull similar double-duty with the Mercedes F1 team (or another Benz-powered outfit) this year before spring-boarding back into grand prix racing in the future. At 27 years old, he may not have been the youngest driver on the grid this year, but he's still got a good few years ahead of him.

Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating

Mon, Aug 6 2018

Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.