2001 Lincoln Town Car Executive Sedan 4-door 4.6l on 2040-cars
Eau Galle, Wisconsin, United States
Engine:4.6L 8 Cylinder Gasoline Fuel
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Sedan
Vehicle Title:Clear
For Sale By:Private Seller
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Make: Lincoln
Model: Town Car
Number of Doors: 4
Trim: Executive Sedan 4-Door
Drive Type: RWD
Number of Cylinders: 8
Mileage: 95,000
Sub Model: Executive
Exterior Color: Silver
Options: Sunroof, Leather Seats, CD Player
Interior Color: Gray
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag, Side Airbags
Up for sale is this very clean low mileage lincoln. My boss originally purchased the car with the intent for me to use it for work. So far I've put nearly 5000 miles on it but there's just not enough room to haul all of my equipment. So it's gotta go. Please contact me with any questions. The only known issue is it looks like the previous owner may have had a cat and there are some nicks/scratches in the front two seats. Paint is in wonderful condition. Fresh oil change :-)
Lincoln Town Car for Sale
2007 lincoln town car
2006 lincoln town car signature limited sedan,super clean,see video,no reserve
4dr sdn signature edition 4.6l cd 1 owner!!!! clean carfax!!!! only 46k miles!!!(US $12,500.00)
Beautiful 2003 lincoln town car executive edt only 62,431 miles v-8 auto leather(US $8,995.00)
Fl one owner super low miles amazing condition rare colors just stunning as new
02 cartier, very clean very good cond. runs excellent just needs windshield
Auto Services in Wisconsin
Wendt`s Auto Body ★★★★★
VIP Auto Sales ★★★★★
Stags Repair ★★★★★
South St Paul Automotive ★★★★★
Silver Spring Collision Center ★★★★★
Showroom Auto Detailing ★★★★★
Auto blog
NHTSA upgrades Ford floor mat unintended acceleration probe
Mon, 17 Dec 2012According to a Bloomberg report, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has upgraded an investigation into complaints of unintended acceleration lodged against Ford vehicles. The investigation began in June of 2010 when just three complaints had been received and it only concerned the Ford Fusion and Mercury Milan, but this was at a time when the phrase "unintended acceleration" made grown men go pale. With 49 additional complaints received since then, the investigation has been reclassified as an engineering analysis - the last phase before a recall - and it has been expanded to include the Lincoln MKZ, making for a total of "around 480,000" units affected between the three sedans from the 2008 to 2010 model years.
The ostensible cause is that floor mats are trapping the accelerator pedal, but according to a Ford statement at the time, the entrapment is due to owners placing the optional all-weather floor mats, or aftermarket floor mats, on top of the car's standard floor mats. NHTSA has backed up that assessment, pinning the blame on "unsecured or double stacked floor mats."
On the face of it, it would appear that NHTSA has upgraded the status not because of Ford's error, but owner error, and Ford has stated publicly that it is "disappointed" in NHTSA's move. On top of NHTSA still being skittish after that other unintended acceleration debacle, it could be seen to be taking its time investigating all of the variables: it's reported that Ford changed its accelerator pedal design in 2010, a "heel blocker" in the floorpan has been considered a potential culprit in how the floor mats could be trapping the pedal, some drivers have said the floor mats weren't anywhere near the pedal, and according to a report in the LA Times, in "a letter sent by Ford to NHTSA in August 2010, the automaker said it found three injuries and one fatality that 'may have resulted from the alleged defect.'"
Ford tumbles to second worst in Consumer Reports reliability survey, list dominated by Japanese [w/video]
Mon, 29 Oct 2012It's no secret that MyFord Touch has had its share of problems since being introduced, but the most recent reliability survey from Consumer Reports shows just how much this infotainment system has affected Ford. Just two years ago, the automaker was in the top 10 for the institute's reliability rankings, but since then, it has tumbled to the second-lowest rung just above dead-last Jaguar. In addition to MyFord Touch, CR also attributes a handful of new products that have had issues right out of the gate.
Compiled from 1.2 million subscriber surveys, this year's auto reliability survey heavily favors Japanese automakers, with eight of the 10 spots hailing from Japan. Toyota brands grabbed the top three spots (Scion, Toyota and Lexus - in that order) with Mazda, Subaru, Honda and Acura filling the next four spots. The only non-Asian automaker cracking the top 10 was Audi at number eight.
Audi climbed a total of 18 spots from last year, and Cadillac and GMC round out this year's top gainers breaking into the top 15. Helping Cadillac's upward movement, the CTS Coupe was named the most reliable domestic car. Lincoln, Volvo and Chrysler join Ford on this year's biggest loser list.
Ford faces class-action lawsuit for selling vehicles without brake override systems
Fri, 29 Mar 2013A total of 20 Ford customers are suing the automaker in a class-action lawsuit for selling vehicles "vulnerable to unintended acceleration." According to Reuters, the suit names 30 models built between 2002 and 2010 with electronic throttle control systems but without a brake override system. Those include the 2004-2012 F-Series pickups and the 2005-2009 Lincoln Town Car. Adam Levitt, a partner with the law firm of Grant & Eisenhofer says the plaintiffs in the case want "to be compensated for their economic losses by having overpaid for cars that contained defects." Levitt contends that the plaintiffs would not have bought their vehicles or paid less for them had they known there was no brake override system in place.
Ford began installing brake override systems in its vehicles beginning in 2010. In response to the lawsuit, Ford has pointed to research by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration that indicated that unintended acceleration is mostly caused by driver error, saying in a statement that, "NHTSA's work is far more scientific and trustworthy than work done by personal injury lawyers and their paid experts."
Belville et al v. Ford Motor Co. will be heard in US District Court in the Southern District of West Virginia.