91 Lincoln Mark Vii Lsc 47k Miles No Reserve Silver/blue on 2040-cars
Topeka, Kansas, United States
|
91 Lincoln Mark VII LSC 47K Miles, Excellent Condition, 5.0 HO V8, Runs and shifts like new, Leather has no wear, like new. Drives great at any speed. Ice Cold A/C, New Michelin Tires. The original stereo head has been replaced by a high quality JVC unit. Also, has a built in RADAR DETECTOR. Original Paint with no paint work or rust. These cars were around $32K in 1991, and a very desirable car to own. This has the same motor as the Mustang GT. Plenty of room to add a supercharger under the hood. Most of these cars that come up for sale with low miles in this condition and miles are priced from $10K and up. Whether you keep this as a beautiful comfortable, classy Sunday driver, or you use it as a daily driver, it will last many many years, and will still retain a decent selling price. I could be open to a trade in plus cash ... depending on what it is.II LSC, 47K Miles, Excellent Condition, 5.0 HO V8, Runs and shifts like new, Leather has no wear, like new. Drives great at any speed. Ice Cold A/C, New Michelin Tires. The original stereo head has been replaced by a high quality JVC unit. Also, has a built in RADAR DETECTOR. Original Paint with no paint work or rust. These cars were around $32K in 1991, and a very desirable car to own. This has the same motor as the Mustang GT. Plenty of room to add a supercharger under the hood. Most of these cars that come up for sale with low miles in this condition and miles are priced from $10K and up. Whether you keep this as a beautiful comfortable, classy Sunday driver, or you use it as a daily driver, it will last many many years, and will still retain a decent selling price. I could be open to a trade in plus cash ... depending on what it is.
|
Lincoln Mark Series for Sale
1974 lincoln mark iv no reserve low miles one owner
1989 lincoln mark vii lsc black
2006 lincoln mark lt crew cab 4x4
1998 lincoln mark viii base sedan 2-door 4.6l
1972 lincoln mark iv 7.5l big block 460 4v auto loaded
1990 lincoln mark vii lsc sedan 2-door 5.0lAuto Services in Kansas
Whitey`s Auto Repair ★★★★★
Westlink Auto Service ★★★★★
Unlimited Auto Sales ★★★★★
Starbird`s Collision Experts ★★★★★
Rick`s Custom Exhaust & Auto Repair ★★★★★
Pit Stop Automotive ★★★★★
Auto blog
Lincoln needs a farewell address, not a new marketing plan
Tue, 09 Apr 2013
The trouble with Ford's Lincoln brand is that no one cares about it any more.
Not long after I heard that Mark LaNeve, chief operating officer of Ford agency Team Detroit, was moving to take over direct operations of the New York ad agency Hudson Rouge for Lincoln, I heard that JCPenney CEO Ron Johnson was ousted. The two events are connected.
Trump did talk to Bill Ford, but the Kentucky plant was never moving to Mexico
Fri, Nov 18 2016President-elect Donald J. Trump has been butting heads with Ford for a while now. A lot of it seems to stem from misunderstanding or misrepresenting facts about how the automaker currently does business and its plans for the future. After a sit-down with executive chairman Bill Ford Jr., the misunderstandings continue, but Trump has apparently convinced the company to make some changes. During his campaign, Trump claimed that Ford was going to fire US workers and move manufacturing to Mexico. That wasn't the case – yes, Ford planned to transfer Focus and C-Max production from Wayne, Michigan, to Cuautitlan, Mexico, but no, that wouldn't mean anyone losing their job. The Wayne plant will continue to operate, and likely busier than before, as it will be the home of the new Bronco and Ranger. So Ford CEO Mark Fields responded with the facts, and then chairman Bill Ford Jr. sat down with Trump over the summer. Things apparently weren't resolved to Trump's satisfaction, so he and Bill Ford spoke on the phone yesterday as he claims in this tweet: This content is hosted by a third party. To view it, please update your privacy preferences. Manage Settings. Let's pick that apart. First off, it's not a Lincoln plant, per se – the Louisville Assembly Plant currently builds the Ford Escape and Lincoln MKC, two small crossovers that share a platform. Ford was considering moving MKC production out of Kentucky to Mexico, but it would not have resulted in many lost jobs if any – the union had already agreed to moving the MKC in 2015 negotiations, and taking production of the slow-selling Lincoln out of the plant would open up capacity for more Fords. Be that as it may, Ford has decided not to move MKC production out of the plant, either for political reasons of placation or because it didn't make the greatest deal of business sense, maybe a combination of the two. That means Trump isn't really saving any American jobs in the short term. If anything, this move could keep Ford supply-constrained and result in reduced sales, which in turn brings the company less money and affects the bottom line and all employees. But that's speculation, so we won't tweet it. There is of course the possibility that Ford will be convinced, either by sheer will or by a more attractive trade situation, to invest in increased US production, which could bear fruit later on. We are told by Ford that the two men did in fact speak yesterday.
Ford faces class-action lawsuit for selling vehicles without brake override systems
Fri, 29 Mar 2013A total of 20 Ford customers are suing the automaker in a class-action lawsuit for selling vehicles "vulnerable to unintended acceleration." According to Reuters, the suit names 30 models built between 2002 and 2010 with electronic throttle control systems but without a brake override system. Those include the 2004-2012 F-Series pickups and the 2005-2009 Lincoln Town Car. Adam Levitt, a partner with the law firm of Grant & Eisenhofer says the plaintiffs in the case want "to be compensated for their economic losses by having overpaid for cars that contained defects." Levitt contends that the plaintiffs would not have bought their vehicles or paid less for them had they known there was no brake override system in place.
Ford began installing brake override systems in its vehicles beginning in 2010. In response to the lawsuit, Ford has pointed to research by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration that indicated that unintended acceleration is mostly caused by driver error, saying in a statement that, "NHTSA's work is far more scientific and trustworthy than work done by personal injury lawyers and their paid experts."
Belville et al v. Ford Motor Co. will be heard in US District Court in the Southern District of West Virginia.