Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1974 Lincoln Continental Mark Iv on 2040-cars

Year:1974 Mileage:92000 Color: Blue /
 Blue
Location:

Saint Charles, Michigan, United States

Saint Charles, Michigan, United States
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:8
For Sale By:Private Seller
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Coupe
VIN: 4Y89A875518 Year: 1974
Make: Lincoln
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Windows, Power Seats
Model: Mark Series
Sub Model: MARK IV
Miles: 92000
Exterior Color: Blue
Trim: COUPE 2 DOOR
Interior Color: Blue
Drive Type: REAR WHEELS
Mileage: 92,000
Number of Cylinders: 8
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

ONE OWNER, ALL ORIGINAL, NEVER BEEN RESTORED.   ORIGINAL, BILL OF SALE, TITLE, OWNER'S MANUAL. 460-4V ENGINE, LOADED, FULL POWER, 92K, RUNS AND DRIVES GREAT. LOCATION IS ST. CHARLES, MICHIGAN 48655

Auto Services in Michigan

Welling`s Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Towing, Brake Repair
Address: Stanwood
Phone: (989) 967-3642

Waterford Garage ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 3783 Elizabeth Lake Rd, Lathrup-Village
Phone: (248) 499-6767

Victor George Chrysler-Jeep ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers
Address: 5050 S Saginaw Rd, Clayton-Twp
Phone: (810) 744-6537

Twin Village Tire & Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Towing
Address: 1755 Metamora Rd, Oxford
Phone: (248) 628-4025

Tuffy Auto Service Centers ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair
Address: 2716 S Rochester Rd, Bingham-Farms
Phone: (248) 392-2098

Tuffy Auto Service Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Wheels-Frame & Axle Servicing-Equipment
Address: G3045 Miller Rd, Otisville
Phone: (810) 239-6643

Auto blog

NHTSA closes rollaway investigation into 1.56M Ford SUVs

Mon, 11 Mar 2013

It's taken four years of study, but the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has finally closed the books on its investigation into rollaway accusations surrounding 1.56-million Ford SUV models.
The probe, which centered on the 2002-2005 Ford Explorer, 2002-2005 Mercury Mountaineer and 2003-2005 Lincoln Aviator, ends without the federal agency calling for a recall. According to The Detroit News, the investigation was closed due to a "low number of complaints" - NHTSA documented 180 such complaints that resulted in 14 crashes and six minor injuries, but the number of incidents have been slowing. The suspected defect rate for the trucks' automatic transmissions was found to be 4.4 per 100,000 units, and the brake-shift interlock mechanism failure rate was judged to be even lower at 3.4 per 100k.

1955 Lincoln Indianapolis concept up for auction

Sat, 21 Sep 2013


Lincoln was never a brand known for making sports cars. In fact it hasn't offered anything with less than four doors since the demise of the Mark VIII, and that was hardly what you'd call "performance oriented". But that doesn't mean that Ford's luxury marque never toyed with the idea.
In 1955 Ford delivered a Lincoln chassis (along with a 200-horsepower V8 engine and four-speed automatic transmission) to Carrozzeria Boano, an Italian coachbuilder that had just branched off from Ghia the year before. The resulting orange coupe you see here was named after Indianapolis and was unveiled at the Turin Motor Show. And while its detailing may have been divisive, the overall shape certainly caught the eye.

2017 Lincoln Continental: Was this mic-drop moment just a big flop?

Thu, Jan 21 2016

The Lincoln Continental may have been our fifth-place pick for Best In Show at this year's Detroit Auto Show, but it's probably the one we argued about the most. In fact, we're still talking about it. And we'll no doubt be discussing it long after we finally get to drive the new sedan later this year. We do this with lots of cars, all the time. The Continental is an especially important, high-profile car right now. It has the task of being a torch-holder for the struggling-to-run Lincoln brand, and that's a tough job these days. But did Lincoln do right by its Continental name? Did its Detroit showcar stop us in our tracks, or were we left feeling cold? In an effort to show you our full discussion, we're trying something different. About a week after the Detroit Auto Show press days concluded, Autoblog's Jonathon Ramsey sent an email around to some editors about the Continental to open a discussion. It got heated, and fast. And while we considered summarizing it, we decided to instead post the whole, largely unedited (adjusted for typos and swear words) chain. From: Jonathon Ramsey To: Autoblog Team Does anyone else think it's a problem that the new Continental looks 85 percent like the MKZ? And another 10 percent of it looks like a Jaguar and a Bentley? Because I think Lincoln screwed the pooch. The German Three plus Porsche can make cars that look alike – they've earned the right, even if I'd rather they didn't. The MKZ looks like a car for regional sales reps. Lincoln broke the glass in case of emergency, grabbed the Continental name, then put it on a car that looks a lot like that sales-rep car, but one for regional VPs. Do we really think this can work? Because I don't. From: Steven Ewing To: Autoblog Team Personally, I'm pretty disappointed in the final execution of Continental. I'm glad Lincoln isn't obsessed with chasing the Germans, but at this point, it's not even chasing Cadillac. I think that introducing the new front end and TTV6 engine on the MKZ before the Continental was a huge mistake. And while I have high hopes for the Conti from a comfort/driving standpoint, my gut instinct is that it's going to be more "better than the MKS" than "best American luxury sedan." Introducing the new front end and TTV6 engine on the MKZ before the Continental was a huge mistake.