Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2002 Lincoln Continental on 2040-cars

US $2,800.00
Year:2002 Mileage:122929 Color: PEARL WHITE /
 CREAM
Location:

Cranston, Rhode Island, United States

Cranston, Rhode Island, United States
Vehicle Title:Clear
For Sale By:Dealer
Engine:4.6L 281Cu. In. V8 GAS DOHC Naturally Aspirated
Body Type:Sedan
Transmission:4 Speed Automatic
Fuel Type:GAS
VIN: 1LNHM97V32Y699184 Year: 2002
Make: Lincoln
Model: Continental
MPGHighway: 25
Trim: Base Sedan 4-Door
BodyStyle: Sedan
MPGCity: 17
Drive Type: FWD
FuelType: Gasoline
Mileage: 122,929
Sub Model: Driver Select
Number of Doors: 4
Exterior Color: PEARL WHITE
Interior Color: CREAM
Number of Cylinders: 8
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

Auto Services in Rhode Island

Will`s Garage ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services
Address: 3230 Acushnet Ave, Tiverton
Phone: (508) 995-2258

Whaling City Ford Lincoln Mercury Mazda ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 475 Broad St (At Colman), Westerly
Phone: (860) 865-1571

Sakonnet Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair
Address: 560 Main Rd, Tiverton
Phone: (401) 624-6000

Rossi`s Auto Care ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 771 Nooseneck Hill Rd, West-Greenwich
Phone: (401) 397-6400

Robert`s Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 193 Pine St, Valley-Falls
Phone: (508) 342-5023

Nathan`s Garage ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 16 Copicut Rd, Warren
Phone: (508) 644-9898

Auto blog

Ford to update Sync, MyFord Touch software... again

Wed, 07 Aug 2013

Ford hasn't had the best luck with its MyFord Touch and Sync systems, as the finicky infotainment system has been subject to a critical whooping while customer issues have helped sink Ford's IQS scores. The automaker has made a concerted effort, though, to try and fix MyFord Touch. And while the results have been mixed, The Blue Oval is hoping its latest free update, set to go live next week, will make things better.
According to a report from The Detroit News, the new system promises streamlined voice commands with fewer levels between opening query and actual result. Ford is also addressing where certain options are selected on the touchscreen. Rather than working one of the four quadrants on the homescreen, users will be able to select anywhere within the quadrant to make adjustments.
While it might only be a band-aid for MFT's problems, the fact that Ford is still trying to improve it is a promising sign. It's going to take more than just this update to address the system's ills, though.

A car writer's year in new vehicles [w/video]

Thu, Dec 18 2014

Christmas is only a week away. The New Year is just around the corner. As 2014 draws to a close, I'm not the only one taking stock of the year that's we're almost shut of. Depending on who you are or what you do, the end of the year can bring to mind tax bills, school semesters or scheduling dental appointments. For me, for the last eight or nine years, at least a small part of this transitory time is occupied with recalling the cars I've driven over the preceding 12 months. Since I started writing about and reviewing cars in 2006, I've done an uneven job of tracking every vehicle I've been in, each year. Last year I made a resolution to be better about it, and the result is a spreadsheet with model names, dates, notes and some basic facts and figures. Armed with this basic data and a yen for year-end stories, I figured it would be interesting to parse the figures and quantify my year in cars in a way I'd never done before. The results are, well, they're a little bizarre, honestly. And I think they'll affect how I approach this gig in 2015. {C} My tally for the year is 68 cars, as of this writing. Before the calendar flips to 2015 it'll be as high as 73. Let me give you a tiny bit of background about how automotive journalists typically get cars to test. There are basically two pools of vehicles I drive on a regular basis: media fleet vehicles and those available on "first drive" programs. The latter group is pretty self-explanatory. Journalists are gathered in one location (sometimes local, sometimes far-flung) with a new model(s), there's usually a day of driving, then we report back to you with our impressions. Media fleet vehicles are different. These are distributed to publications and individual journalists far and wide, and the test period goes from a few days to a week or more. Whereas first drives almost always result in a piece of review content, fleet loans only sometimes do. Other times they serve to give context about brands, segments, technology and the like, to editors and writers. So, adding up the loans I've had out of the press fleet and things I've driven at events, my tally for the year is 68 cars, as of this writing. Before the calendar flips to 2015, it'll be as high as 73. At one of the buff books like Car and Driver or Motor Trend, reviewers might rotate through five cars a week, or more. I know that number sounds high, but as best I can tell, it's pretty average for the full-time professionals in this business.

Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating

Mon, Aug 6 2018

Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.