Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1994 Lincoln Town Car Signature on 2040-cars

US $3,777.00
Year:1994 Mileage:117244 Color: Red
Location:

7952 Veterans Memorial Pkwy, Saint Peters, Missouri, United States

7952 Veterans Memorial Pkwy, Saint Peters, Missouri, United States
1994 Lincoln Town Car Signature, US $3,777.00, image 1
Advertising:
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:4.6L V8 16V MPFI SOHC
Transmission:4-Speed Automatic
Condition: Used
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1LNLM82W5RY618247
Stock Num: 2142
Make: Lincoln
Model: Town Car Signature
Year: 1994
Exterior Color: Red
Options:
  • 4 Door
  • 4-wheel ABS Brakes
  • AM/FM stereo
  • Automatic front air conditioning
  • Body-colored bumpers
  • Cargo area light
  • Cassette player
  • Clock: In-radio
  • Cloth seat upholstery
  • Cornering Lights
  • Cruise control
  • Diameter of tires: 15.0
  • Door pockets: Driver and passenger
  • Dusk sensing headlights
  • Floor mats: Carpet front and rear
  • Front and rear reading lights
  • Front Disc brakes
  • Front suspension stabilizer bar
  • Fuel Capacity: 20.0 gal.
  • Fuel Consumption: City: 18 mpg
  • Fuel Consumption: Highway: 25 mpg
  • Fuel Type: Regular unleaded
  • Headlights off auto delay
  • Heated driver mirror
  • Heated passenger mirror
  • Intermittent front wipers
  • Leather steering wheel trim
  • Overall height: 56.7"
  • Overall Length: 218.9"
  • Overall Width: 76.9"
  • Passenger Airbag
  • Power remote driver mirror adjustment
  • Power remote passenger mirror adjustment
  • Power windows
  • Privacy glass: Light
  • Rear leveling suspension
  • Rear seats center armrest
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Remote power door locks
  • Seatback storage: 2
  • Spare Tire Mount Location: Inside under cargo
  • Speed-proportional power steering
  • Tilt-adjustable steering wheel
  • Tires: Prefix: P
  • Tires: Profile: 70
  • Tires: Speed Rating: P
  • Tires: Width: 215
  • Type of tires: AS
  • Wheelbase: 117.4"
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 117244

Not from the St. Louis? No problem, we can ship your purchase anywhere in the continental U.S. for FREE! Call today at 888-612-7311!

Auto Services in Missouri

Weber Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Storage
Address: 5822 McPherson Ave, Saint-Ann
Phone: (314) 725-9498

Shuler`s Service Station ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Gas Stations
Address: 3026 W Chestnut Expy, Turners
Phone: (417) 881-0101

Schaefer Autobody Centers ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Windshield Repair
Address: 16109 Manchester Rd, Crescent
Phone: (855) 795-5455

OK Tire Store ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Brake Repair
Address: Dugginsville
Phone: (417) 967-3694

Mr. Transmission ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission, Auto Transmission Parts
Address: 302 Business Loop 70 W, Wooldridge
Phone: (573) 441-2358

M & L Auto Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Gas Stations
Address: 315 E Broadway St, Fair-Play
Phone: (417) 326-8777

Auto blog

2018 Lincoln Navigator Review | 900 miles in mid-century opulence

Fri, Aug 10 2018

PORTLAND, Ore. — Driving the 2019 Lincoln Navigator on my usual 80-mile evaluation route just wouldn't be sufficient. The quick jaunt through downtown Portland and out into wooded mountain roads couldn't possibly do justice to a vehicle intended for the literal long haul. All those seats; all that cargo space; all that comfort and opulence. What the Navigator needed was a road trip, so I took two of them — within five days, over 900 miles and a grand total of 20 hours and 17 minutes in the 24-way power-adjustable, massaging, ventilated saddle. The first journey would be from Portland down to Bend, Ore., and then working my way gradually back through central Oregon backroads. This included winding two-lane highways where the Navigator's excellent adaptive cruise control system maintained its distance (and my sanity) when stuck behind parades of Outbacks, before the 450-horsepower EcoBoost V6 of Raptor fame could dispatch them from across the dotted yellow line. Enough really can't be said about how masterful this engine is — so smooth, so powerful and so quiet. It's perfect for a Lincoln. It also got 20 mpg over the course of the full 900 miles, which compares to the EPA's 21 mpg highway rating. Pretty good given the mountainous terrain and the liberal throttle applied to keep up with a pair of substantially sportier cars I was trailing as part of a photo shoot. Not that the Navigator was really able to keep up with anything once the road got tighter and twistier through the lava fields of the Willamette National Forest. Though I still concur with my initial praise of the Navigator's independent rear suspension and steering that "provides consistent, appropriate and reassuring weighting," there's no getting around the laws of physics. This is a gigantic land craft pushing three tons that's best kept at a relaxed pace – also perfect for a Lincoln. As for the ride, which disappointed during my Navigator first drive in Southern California, the "omnipresent nervousness" I reported didn't really materialize on better pavement in Oregon and later in Washington. True, it's not quite as supple as a unibody Range Rover or Mercedes GLS would be, but it doesn't suffer from the near constant vibration over even the smallest bumps you get in a Chevy Suburban or GMC Yukon XL. On the subject of comfort, though, those 24-way front seats can't be ignored.

Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating

Mon, Aug 6 2018

Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.

Tesla leads and Infiniti bleeds in Consumer Reports' satisfaction survey

Mon, Feb 8 2021

According to Consumer Reports, Tesla owners are more likely to rave about their vehicles than any other brand. And we're not surprised — Tesla has performed very well in past customer satisfaction surveys, despite the fact that the electric cars themselves tend to have more problems than most other automobiles. Second place went to Lincoln, which interestingly had a higher cumulative score than Tesla in individual category measurements like comfort and storage space. Ram, a truck-only brand, rounded out the top three. The consumer-focused magazine bases its owner satisfaction score on responses to a very simple question: Would you buy this exact car again? The higher percentage of owners who answer "definitely yes" to that question, the higher the satisfaction score. Further breakdowns are scored for other parts of the ownership experience, which is why brands that rank poorly in Consumer Reports' own reliability charts — like Tesla and Lincoln, for example — can still earn top marks for satisfaction. The lowest-ranked brands for satisfaction are Cadillac, Nissan and Infiniti. Interestingly, Cadillac performed better than average in Driving and Comfort and middle-of-the-road in the In-Car Electronics and Cabin Storage, but like most other brands, scored poorly in Value. In fact, only Subaru, Mazda and Volkswagen scored better than average in Value. Nissan and especially Infiniti earned comparatively low marks across the board to go along with the bottom-of-the-barrel satisfaction score. Here's the full list of automakers from Consumer Reports' satisfaction survey, ranked in order from best to worst: Tesla Lincoln Ram Chrysler Subaru Hyundai Porsche Dodge Mazda Toyota Kia Mini BMW Ford Audi Honda Volvo Volkswagen Lexus Jeep GMC Chevrolet Mercedes-Benz Buick Cadillac Nissan Infiniti It's worth diving into the individual category scores in addition to the official finishing order for a full look at the results. For instance, despite the fact that automakers like Lincoln and Ford use similar infotainment systems, their In-Car Electronics scores don't quite match up. Also, some automakers have full lineups with multiple cars, trucks and SUVs while others offer just a couple of nameplates. Head on over to Consumer Reports for all the details. Looking for a reliable car, truck or SUV? Check out the top 10 vehicles that owners keep the longest.