2020 Lincoln Nautilus Standard on 2040-cars
Engine:2.0L Turbocharged
For Sale By:Dealer
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Transmission:Automatic
Vehicle Title:Clean
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 2LMPJ8J91LBL26240
Mileage: 37456
Drive Type: AWD
Exterior Color: Black
Interior Color: Black
Make: Lincoln
Manufacturer Exterior Color: Infinite Black
Manufacturer Interior Color: Ebony
Model: Nautilus
Number of Cylinders: 4
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Sub Model: AWD Standard 4dr SUV
Trim: Standard
Warranty: Vehicle has an existing warranty
Lincoln Nautilus for Sale
- 2020 lincoln nautilus reserve awd(US $15,500.00)
- 2019 lincoln nautilus reserve sport utility 4d(US $25,802.00)
- 2022 lincoln nautilus reserve(US $35,900.00)
- 2022 lincoln nautilus reserve(US $38,190.00)
- 2022 lincoln nautilus reserve awd tow pkg monochromatic moonroof(US $42,795.00)
- 2021 lincoln nautilus reserve(US $20,953.10)
Auto blog
2015 Lincoln Navigator leaked ahead of tomorrow's reveal [UPDATE]
Thu, Jan 23 2014This content is hosted by a third party. To view it, please update your privacy preferences. Manage Settings.
Consumer Reports explains its disdain for infotainment
Thu, 20 Mar 2014One of the perks of reviewing all manner of cars and trucks is that we're exposed to all the different infotainment systems. Whether Cadillac's CUE, Chrysler's UConnect, BMW's iDrive or MyFord Touch, we sample each and every infotainment system on the market.
Not surprisingly, some are better than others. It seems consumers have come to a similar consensus, with Consumer Reports claiming that Ford and Lincoln, Cadillac and Honda offer the worst user infotainment experiences. Not surprisingly, you won't find much argument among the Autoblog staff.
Take a look below to see just what it is about the latest batch of infotainment systems that grinds CR's gears. After that, scroll down into Comments and let us know if you agree with the mag's views.
Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating
Mon, Aug 6 2018Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.