2010 Lincoln Mkt Ecoboost/awd **no Reserve** on 2040-cars
Arlington, Virginia, United States
Body Type:Sport Utility
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:3.5L 3496CC 213Cu. In. V6 GAS DOHC Turbocharged
For Sale By:Private Seller
Fuel Type:GAS
Year: 2010
Make: Lincoln
Model: MKT
Warranty: Vehicle has an existing warranty
Trim: EcoBoost Sport Utility 4-Door
Options: Sunroof
Drive Type: AWD
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes
Mileage: 34,760
Power Options: Air Conditioning
Exterior Color: Silver
Interior Color: Black
Number of Doors: 4
Number of Cylinders: 6
|
Please find my wife's MKT up for auction. I bought this car for her about a year ago after an exhaustive search, as we wanted an ecoboost model in exceptional condition, but with bucket rear seats and NO rear center counsel, I found that it was a rare bird; one dealer told me that less than 5% of MKT's came with the captain's chairs but no counsel. Not having the center counsel makes the third row far more accessible and easy to use. Aside from that option, I believe this car has all others available.
The condition of the car is excellent, it has never been smoked in, has no stone chips, no dents/dings, the wheels have very little scuffing or curb damage, no body damage ever, no paint work, etc. The only blemish you'll find is the light scratch on the driver's side passenger door, which you'll see in the photos. We take phenomenal care of our vehicles, I am a car enthusiast, and am adamant about preventive maintenance. On my older cars a lot is needed, on this car, not as much. I just had it at the dealer last week, they found nothing of need to be replaced. To prep it for sale, I just had new tires installed (they literally have 6 miles on them) and had the oil/filter changed. The car is still under warranty until 50,000 miles or summer 2014, but as it sits now it needs nothing. If you run a carfax you'll find that I'm the second owner, and that the previous owner, like me, was diligent about the maintenance. I purchased the car from a BMW dealer in Atlanta, it had been a trade in, and at the time had about 21,000 on it. We've put on about 11,000 miles since, all of those miles have been enjoyable and trouble free, this is a great car for every day or long hauls. It has good space, very good livability, comfort, ease of use, good gas mileage, etc. The only reason we are selling is to get a slightly larger SUV, if it were up to me we'd keep it, but it's her car, and she wants a full size SUV...so off it goes! |
Lincoln MKT for Sale
Quads-third-nav-dual moon-reverse camera-my ford touch-awd
2012 white wagon!(US $28,900.00)
1 owner lincoln mkt eco boost all wheel drive with navigation backup camera ba(US $25,950.00)
2013 ecoboost new turbo 3.5l v6 24v automatic awd suv premium
Leather panorama roof 3rd row seat cd player back up camera off lease only(US $25,999.00)
2010 lincoln mkt prmium loaded navi panoramic lthr free shipping(US $25,991.00)
Auto Services in Virginia
Winkler Automotive Service Center ★★★★★
Williamsons Body Shop & Wrecker Service ★★★★★
Wells Auto Sales ★★★★★
Variety Motors ★★★★★
Valley Collision Repair Inc ★★★★★
Tidewater Import Auto Repair LLC ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford recalls 9,900 vehicles across two campaigns
Tue, Dec 29 2015Ford is recalling a total of 9,885 vehicles in two campaigns. The Basics: In one recall, Ford will recall 9,017 examples of the 2013 Escape with build dates from January 11, 2012, to April 1, 2013, and the 2013-2014 Focus ST produced between May 3, 2012, and October 14, 2013. The Problem: Splices in the engine wiring harness might not have enough compression, and this can cause the manifold absolute pressure sensor to send incorrect signals to the powertrain control module. This issue could cause the engine to stall. Injuries/Deaths: None reported. The Fix: Dealers will replace the current crimped splices with new splices, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. If You Own One: The repair campaign will begin on January 4, 2016. More Information: Ford recalled the 2013 Escape and Focus ST in August 2014 for the same problem, and this is an expansion of that campaign, according to company spokesperson John Cangany to Autoblog. The Basics: In the smaller of the two campaigns, Ford will recall 868 examples of the 2013 Explorer, Explorer Police Utility, Taurus, Taurus Police Interceptor, Flex, Lincoln MKS, and MKT. The Problem: The fuel delivery module can crack, which would cause a fuel leak. Injuries/Deaths: None reported. The Fix: Dealers will replace the fuel delivery module. If You Own One: Owners should receive notice soon because NHTSA's report says the recall begins in December. More Information: According to Cangany, this recall is an expansion of a campaign from 2013 for these vehicles. RECALL Subject : Engine Wiring Splices may cause Stall Report Receipt Date: DEC 02, 2015 NHTSA Campaign Number: 15V813000 Component(s): ELECTRICAL SYSTEM Potential Number of Units Affected: 9,017 All Products Associated with this Recall Vehicle Make Model Model Year(s) FORD ESCAPE 2013 FORD FOCUS 2013-2014 Details Manufacturer: Ford Motor Company SUMMARY: Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain model year 2013 Escape vehicles manufactured January 11, 2012, to April 1, 2013, and 2013-2014 Focus ST vehicles manufactured May 03, 2012, to October 14, 2013. Insufficient compression in the engine wiring harness splices to the Manifold Absolute Pressure (MAP) sensor may provide incorrect signals to the powertrain control module (PCM). CONSEQUENCE: The incorrect signals could cause the vehicle to hesitate or the engine to stall, increasing the risk of a crash.
Bentley designer calls Lincoln Continental concept a Flying Spur 'copy' [w/poll]
Tue, Mar 31 2015When you first laid eyes on the new Lincoln Continental concept, we'd wager you were likely impressed, because it's an impressive design. But if you also thought it looked familiar, you're in good company. According to Car Design News, design chief Luc Donckerwolke over at Bentley thinks the Lincoln concept bears more than a passing resemblance to another Continental: Bentley's own Flying Spur. "This behavior is not respectable. Building a copy like this is giving a bad name to the car design world," Donckerwolke told CDN, after posting some disparaging comments on Facebook and offering in jest to send over the tooling. "It is very disappointing, especially for an exclusive brand like Lincoln," added Sangyup Lee, his deputy for exterior design. The irony is further entrenched by the name, which Bentley only dropped from its Flying Spur in its latest iteration but still uses for the coupe and convertible models. Both automakers have a deeply routed history with the nameplate, but Lincoln's stretches back further, having first used the handle in 1939 before Bentley did in 1952. However it's not the nameplate that's the subject of controversy here, rather the design of the vehicle to which it's applied. So what do you think, did Lincoln borrow too heavily from its British counterpart? Related Video:
NHTSA upgrades Ford floor mat unintended acceleration probe
Mon, 17 Dec 2012According to a Bloomberg report, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has upgraded an investigation into complaints of unintended acceleration lodged against Ford vehicles. The investigation began in June of 2010 when just three complaints had been received and it only concerned the Ford Fusion and Mercury Milan, but this was at a time when the phrase "unintended acceleration" made grown men go pale. With 49 additional complaints received since then, the investigation has been reclassified as an engineering analysis - the last phase before a recall - and it has been expanded to include the Lincoln MKZ, making for a total of "around 480,000" units affected between the three sedans from the 2008 to 2010 model years.
The ostensible cause is that floor mats are trapping the accelerator pedal, but according to a Ford statement at the time, the entrapment is due to owners placing the optional all-weather floor mats, or aftermarket floor mats, on top of the car's standard floor mats. NHTSA has backed up that assessment, pinning the blame on "unsecured or double stacked floor mats."
On the face of it, it would appear that NHTSA has upgraded the status not because of Ford's error, but owner error, and Ford has stated publicly that it is "disappointed" in NHTSA's move. On top of NHTSA still being skittish after that other unintended acceleration debacle, it could be seen to be taking its time investigating all of the variables: it's reported that Ford changed its accelerator pedal design in 2010, a "heel blocker" in the floorpan has been considered a potential culprit in how the floor mats could be trapping the pedal, some drivers have said the floor mats weren't anywhere near the pedal, and according to a report in the LA Times, in "a letter sent by Ford to NHTSA in August 2010, the automaker said it found three injuries and one fatality that 'may have resulted from the alleged defect.'"
2040Cars.com © 2012-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.
Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the 2040Cars User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
0.032 s, 7967 u






















