2004 Lincoln Aviator Base Sport Utility 4-door 4.6l on 2040-cars
Rochester, New York, United States
This is a nice running and working Suv.
I purchased it to help my friend when the motor gave him problems. He had replaced the transmission with a remanufactured on in may of 2013 at 142K ( with receipt) When I had the car taken to the shop, i opted to just replace the motor with a somewhat lower mileage motor since we did not know the extent of the problems within the original. The new motor had 125K and the suv had 145,996 after new motor was installed we discovered the issue was a hole in the radiator that caused original to overheat, and thus.. whaola.. new motor. so I installed a new radiator, serp. belt, battery, then 2 weeks later the right rear half shaft and hub. I have driven it over 1000 miles, and then summer came and I got my summer car out, so this one is in the barn. Ther is nothing wrong with it, everything works, air, power options, everything. With this said, there are some flaws, its 10 yrs old with 147K. the exterior has some scratches, the right frint corner has a wrinkle in the bumper, the rear gate has a small spot of rust starting, as is also on the RR wheel well when you open the rear door. The interior is light tan, and shows wear. the steering wheel has some tan worn down to the darker brown leather on the left side. the seat show wear. the pockets on the front dors have been removed ( IDK why) and the handles for reclining the front seats need to be replaced as they are missing. the left front seat is missing the plastic trim around the base of the seat None of thse are major issues, I am simply trying to be as detailed as I can, because I know how hard it is to buy a car sight unseen. Mech the only thing I know is there is a tiny oil drip near the oil filter. In the 1000 miles I have used it it say It might have lost a 1/4 cup? its not dropped on the dipstick at all.. its a Tiny tiny spot I noticed. It did pass NYSI in april or may, and I have not had any service light come on.. its really running nice. I will drive it again this winter if I dont sell, but its not the best on gas, so Id be ok with getting something smaller. I have achieved up to 19mpg Hwy and it averages, 13.5-15 normally. average for a awd suv with a v8. i have receipts for all work listed, I lost the labor receipt for the motor install, but I do have the motor receipt, and have no problem taking you to the shop that did the work. they are very reputable. |
Lincoln Aviator for Sale
- 1986 lincoln mark vii lsc only 85k miles loaded rare find must see(US $3,995.00)
- 2004 lincoln aviator base sport utility 4-door 4.6l(US $2,500.00)
- 2004 lincoln aviator suv with only 91,000 miles! leather, cd, dvd, gps, tow pkg(US $5,800.00)
- 2005 lincoln aviator 4dr 2wd luxury premium leather seats low miles 26500 clean!(US $13,500.00)
- 2005 lincoln aviator luxury sport utility 4-door 4.6l
- 2004 lincoln aviator base sport utility 4-door 4.6l(US $6,500.00)
Auto Services in New York
West Herr Chrysler Jeep ★★★★★
Top Edge Inc ★★★★★
The Garage ★★★★★
Star Transmission Company Incorporated ★★★★★
South Street Collision ★★★★★
Safelite AutoGlass - Syracuse ★★★★★
Auto blog
Here are a few of our automotive guilty pleasures
Tue, Jun 23 2020It goes without saying, but I'll say it anyway. The world is full of cars, and just about as many of them are bad as are good. It's pretty easy to pick which fall into each category after giving them a thorough walkaround and, more important, driving them. But every once in a while, an automobile straddles the line somehow between good and bad — it may be hideously overpriced and therefore a marketplace failure, it may be stupid quick in a straight line but handles like a drunken noodle, or it may have an interior that looks like it was made of a mess of injection-molded Legos. Heck, maybe all three. Yet there's something special about some bad cars that actually makes them likable. The idea for this list came to me while I was browsing classified ads for cars within a few hundred miles of my house. I ran across a few oddballs and shared them with the rest of the team in our online chat room. It turns out several of us have a few automotive guilty pleasures that we're willing to admit to. We'll call a few of 'em out here. Feel free to share some of your own in the comments below. Dodge Neon SRT4 and Caliber SRT4: The Neon was a passably good and plucky little city car when it debuted for the 1995 model year. The Caliber, which replaced the aging Neon and sought to replace its friendly marketing campaign with something more sinister, was panned from the very outset for its cheap interior furnishings, but at least offered some decent utility with its hatchback shape. What the two little front-wheel-drive Dodge models have in common are their rip-roarin' SRT variants, each powered by turbocharged 2.4-liter four-cylinder engines. Known for their propensity to light up their front tires under hard acceleration, the duo were legitimately quick and fun to drive with a fantastic turbo whoosh that called to mind the early days of turbo technology. — Consumer Editor Jeremy Korzeniewski Chevrolet HHR SS: Chevy's HHR SS came out early in my automotive journalism career, and I have fond memories of the press launch (and having dinner with Bob Lutz) that included plenty of tire-smoking hard launches and demonstrations of the manual transmission's no-lift shift feature. The 260-horsepower turbocharged four-cylinder was and still is a spunky little engine that makes the retro-inspired HHR a fun little hot rod that works quite well as a fun little daily driver.
Lincoln bringing in MKZ Hybrid over rollaway risk
Mon, 30 Dec 2013Federal safety standards require that every new car needs to have the brake depressed in order to shift it out of Park. But the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has found fault in the transmission range sensor on certain examples of the Lincoln MKZ Hybrid, allowing the car to be shifted out of Park without first depressing the brake. The fear is that with this condition, affected vehicles may be unintentionally pulled out of Park, resulting in a possible rollaway. That safety concern has prompted parent Ford Motor Company to issue a recall.
The issue pertains to 7,153 examples of the MKZ Hybrid built between April 26, 2012 and September 24, 2013, covering the 2013 and 2014 model years. As a result, Ford will notify owners to bring their MKZs into their local Lincoln dealer to have the Powertrain Control Module software updated in order to rectify the problem. See the full recall notice below for details.
NHTSA upgrades Ford floor mat unintended acceleration probe
Mon, 17 Dec 2012According to a Bloomberg report, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has upgraded an investigation into complaints of unintended acceleration lodged against Ford vehicles. The investigation began in June of 2010 when just three complaints had been received and it only concerned the Ford Fusion and Mercury Milan, but this was at a time when the phrase "unintended acceleration" made grown men go pale. With 49 additional complaints received since then, the investigation has been reclassified as an engineering analysis - the last phase before a recall - and it has been expanded to include the Lincoln MKZ, making for a total of "around 480,000" units affected between the three sedans from the 2008 to 2010 model years.
The ostensible cause is that floor mats are trapping the accelerator pedal, but according to a Ford statement at the time, the entrapment is due to owners placing the optional all-weather floor mats, or aftermarket floor mats, on top of the car's standard floor mats. NHTSA has backed up that assessment, pinning the blame on "unsecured or double stacked floor mats."
On the face of it, it would appear that NHTSA has upgraded the status not because of Ford's error, but owner error, and Ford has stated publicly that it is "disappointed" in NHTSA's move. On top of NHTSA still being skittish after that other unintended acceleration debacle, it could be seen to be taking its time investigating all of the variables: it's reported that Ford changed its accelerator pedal design in 2010, a "heel blocker" in the floorpan has been considered a potential culprit in how the floor mats could be trapping the pedal, some drivers have said the floor mats weren't anywhere near the pedal, and according to a report in the LA Times, in "a letter sent by Ford to NHTSA in August 2010, the automaker said it found three injuries and one fatality that 'may have resulted from the alleged defect.'"