1996 Lexus Sc300 Base Coupe 2-door 3.0l on 2040-cars
Cumberland, Rhode Island, United States
Unique opportunity, one owner black on black 5 speed in excellent condition. Low miles with all dealer service up to date including timing belt. The only one for sale in the US with under 100K and manual transmission, fun to drive and extremely tight.
|
Lexus SC for Sale
- 2004 lexus sc430 sc 430 38k original miles!! parts only runs and drives!!!
- 2dr conv convertible 4.3l nav cd traction control rear wheel drive abs fog lamps(US $19,960.00)
- 2002 lexus sc 430 lexus 2 door convertible(US $16,000.00)
- 1997 lexus sc300 base coupe 2-door 3.0l
- 2002 lexus sc430, navigation, retractable hardtop, mark levinson, super clean(US $12,900.00)
- 1995 lexus sc400 coupe royal jade pearl (dark green)(US $8,500.00)
Auto Services in Rhode Island
Tint Master ★★★★★
Spindle City Auto Glass ★★★★★
Mulzer`s Car Care ★★★★★
Motors East Inc ★★★★★
Monro Muffler Brake & Service ★★★★★
M J Sullivan Automotive Corner ★★★★★
Auto blog
Toyota announces two recalls affecting 1M Corolla, Matrix and Lexus IS models
Wed, 30 Jan 2013The recall bug strikes Toyota again. The automaker has issued a voluntary recall of three models that, in total, represent more than one million units. Around 752,000 2003-2004 Toyota Corolla and Matrix models are being recalled for airbag concerns, while a windshield wiper issue is causing the recall for close to 270,000 Lexus IS sedans from the 2006-2012 model years.
Completely unrelated to the small airbag-related recall issued earlier in the week, the Corolla and Matrix recall is caused by a faulty airbag control module that could potentially short circuit, which could lead to the front airbags or seat belt pretensioners deploying. The Lexus recall is due to a wiper arm nut that wasn't tightened properly, which can cause the wipers to not work when trying to clear heavy buildup such as snow.
Scroll down for a press release that includes more information, as well as details about how owners can contact the manufacturer directly.
Toyota settles first wrongful death suit related to unintended acceleration
Mon, 21 Jan 2013Toyota's sales seem to have rebounded from the unintended acceleration issues from 2009 and 2010, but the automaker is far from done dealing with this situation. Following a settlement worth up to $1.4 billion for economic loss to affected vehicle owners, Toyota has settled rather than going to trial in a wrongful death lawsuit stemming from an accident in Utah in 2010 that left two passengers dead. This isn't the first case in which Toyota has settled, but it was the first among a consolidated group of cases being held in Santa Ana, CA.
According to The Detroit News, this case was scheduled to take place next month, and it was for a November 2010 incident in which Paul Van Alfen and Charlene James Lloyd were killed in a Camry when, based on findings by the Utah Highway Patrol, the accelerator got stuck causing the car to speed out of control and hit a wall; the terms of the settlement were not announced.
The article says that while Toyota will settle on some cases, it doesn't plan on settling on all of them as it still wants to be able to "defend [its] product at trial." This will probably be the case in suits claiming that software for the drive-by-wire accelerator was the cause of an accident in a Toyota or Lexus vehicle. The question of whether or not the electronic accelerator played any role in this problem has been a hot-button topic since the beginning. Toyota has issued recalls in the past to attempt to prevent unintended acceleration caused by trapped floor mats and faulty accelerator pedals, but it also says driver error was to blame in some instances.
What's in a trademark? Sometimes, the next iconic car name
Thu, 07 Aug 2014
The United States Patent and Trademark Office is a treasure trove for auto enthusiasts, especially those who double as conspiracy theorists.
Why has Toyota applied to trademark "Supra," the name of one of its legendary sports cars, even though it hasn't sold one in the United States in 16 years? Why would General Motors continue to register "Chevelle" long after one of the most famous American muscle cars hit the end of the road? And what could Chrysler possibly do with the rights to "313," the area code for Detroit?