Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2003 Lexus Ls430 Base Sedan 4-door 4.3l on 2040-cars

US $8,700.00
Year:2003 Mileage:165000 Color: still shines like new which
Location:

Bowie, Maryland, United States

Bowie, Maryland, United States
Advertising:

i am the 3rd Owner of this 2003 Lexus LS 430 with the 4.3L V8 engine, a 5-Speed Automatic transmission, and only 165K miles.  This LS has nearly every possible option that 

was offered by Lexus,  The Carfax is clean and clear showing no accident history or reports.  The 4.3L 290 H.P. V8 engine runs like a top and is suprisingly powerful. 

 The 5-speed automatic transmission shifts through the gears flawlessly.  The condition of this Lexus overall is rather remarkable.  The silver exterior still shines like new which 

has never seen snow befor since i had it, and the interior was so well kept that there is no denying that I had babied this car from the day I took it home.  It has the upgraded 

$5730 Navigation/Mark Levinson Package, which included an 11 speaker 240 watt AM/FM/CD Premium Audio System with a 6-Disc in dash CD changer.  A touch screen 

Navigation system.  Front and rear climate-controlled air conditioned/heated and cool seats.  Intuitive Park Assist.  And a power tilt and sliding moonroof with a sunshade.  The 

 wheels are in excellent condition and are free of any curb rash, pitting, or damage what so ever. 2 Original key fob is included for the remote keyless entry. One would be hard 

pressed to find a Lexus LS 430 in comparable pries-teen immaculate condition. 

feel free to contact me for any questions 240-274-4482    and good luck.

Auto Services in Maryland

Will`s Road Service & 24-HR Towing Incorporated ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Towing, Shipping Services
Address: 1650 Barclay Rd, Massey
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Warner Auto Body Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 4703 Harford Rd, Perry-Hall
Phone: (410) 254-8594

Virginia Tire & Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 13909 Metrotech Dr, North-Potomac
Phone: (703) 263-2222

Russel Collision and Toyota Service Center ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 1501 S Caton Ave, Fort-Howard
Phone: (410) 525-1000

Rockville Auto Body Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 650 Lofstrand Lane #D, N-Potomac
Phone: (301) 762-4446

Regal Motors Inc ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers
Address: 3906 Jefferson Davis Hwy, Ironsides
Phone: (540) 318-8695

Auto blog

2017 LC 500 is the future of Lexus [w/video]

Mon, Jan 11 2016

The 2017 LC 500 shows where Lexus is headed. In this case it's not just a flashy grille and a big engine like earlier Lexus efforts. This time every facet of the engineering went into making the car handle better, and the styling and engineering were developed hand in hand. It won't set any sales records, but it will win a lot of eyeballs. Why is Lexus making another coupe? That's a fair question, as slow-selling two doors don't do much to improve market share. The reason for the LC is to make a statement, both in terms of style and engineering. It looks remarkably close to the 2012 LF-LC concept. And underpinning the taut styling is a new global architecture that will underpin future cars like the LS. This content is hosted by a third party. To view it, please update your privacy preferences. Manage Settings. The LC 500 is Toyota's way of saying, yet again, that it's serious about reforming the Lexus reputation into one that include performance and style. On paper the 467-horsepower, 5.0-liter V8 (the same as in the RC F and GS F) performance claim looks like sloppy handwriting, but Lexus claims a 0-60 time of less than 4.5 seconds. Rumors abound that more power will come to the LC lineup in a few years, most likely in some kind of turbocharged form. Backing up the engine is a ten-speed transmission. Yes, ten. Lexus claims the gearbox is nearly as fast as a dual-clutch automatic, and that the overall size is smaller than some eight speed 'boxes. Underpinning the LC is an all new structure that includes carbon fiber reinforced plastic, aluminum, and high-strength steel. Torsional rigidity is said to be better than the all-carbon fiber LF A supercar. We're worried the ride could be on the stiff side, with run flat tires on both standard 20-inch wheel and the optional 21-inch wheels seen on the show car. All hope for retaining a pleasant ride lies with the suspension, which is nearly all aluminum. But as we mentioned, this car is skewed towards performance, and Michelin Pilot Super Sport tires on show car promised new levels of lateral grip for a big Lexus. What's more promising is the claim that Lexus spend triple the standard time developing the steering feel and handling. This could be the best-handling Lexus ever, but don't expect the LC 500 to be a Porsche 911 competitor. Preconceptions aside, the LC is bigger than a Carrera and that alone dictates a different character. The Lexus is closer to the Mercedes-Benz S-Class Coupe and BMW 6 Series in size.

Lexus to replace GX SUV with new TX crossover

Wed, 31 Jul 2013

There's been a lot of news regarding future Lexus products recently, including spy shots of new RC coupe and NX compact crossover, and reports that a 2+2 coupe based on the LF-LC concept is heading for production. Now, Automotive News says that Japan's #1 luxury automaker is planning to replace the fullsize, body-on-frame Lexus GX SUV with a three-row crossover called the TX.
The article says that the GX, which is based on the foreign-market Toyota Land Cruiser Prado, will get a styling update for 2014 before being phased out in 2016. In a similar move as Infiniti made with its new three-row JX/QX60, the new TX will be car-based, but details are still unknown as to whether it will be front-wheel-drive riding on the Toyota Avalon platform or rear-wheel-drive using the Lexus GS platform. Either way, this new luxury crossover could join the Lexus lineup as soon as late 2016.

Jaguar solution to keyless start could save lives

Mon, May 14 2018

UPDATED: An earlier version of this story indicated the Jaguar keyless start function was meant as a safety feature, when in fact, it is meant as a convenience one and will not work as described if automatic stop/start is not engaged. Today, The New York Times published an article about more than two dozen deaths related to drivers accidentally leaving their cars running, closing their garages and later succumbing to carbon monoxide that flooded their homes. The reason has been identified as "keyless start" features, or proximity entry and push-button start, where owners don't need to physically handle a key or fob to gain entry into the vehicle or start it. It is the latest, and deadliest, issue raised with this system after those related to security and simple inconvenience (for instance, leaving the car at a valet or car wash with the fob in your pocket). From my personal perspective, The New York Times had a rather harsh "evil carmakers" tone throughout the article. This is not a matter of a known faulty component, as with the GM ignition switch recall. This has as much to do with user error where people leave their car without pressing the "off" button and without noticing the engine is still running. About half of the cars in question are produced by Toyota and Lexus, brands that have offered keyless start longer than most. They are also brands with high rates of elderly owners, who seemingly made up a majority of reported deaths and injuries. One fire department in Florida even started a campaign alerting those in the area of the dangers of leaving your car running when it noticed a correlation between an increase in cars equipped with keyless start and calls related to carbon monoxide poisoning. I see several contributing issues at play, most of which go well beyond this particular issue. First is insufficient training of owners by dealers and/or owners not paying close enough attention during this training. Cars are complicated, but you should at least know how basic functions work. Second, woefully inadequate driver training in this country. Third, and with apologies to the AARP, insufficient testing of elderly drivers and/or insufficiently low standards for elderly drivers. If you don't know you have to shut the car off or cannot hear that an engine is running, perhaps you shouldn't be driving. Fourth, re-examining keyless start systems.