2014 Kia Sedona Ex on 2040-cars
202 South Goose Creek Blvd, Goose Creek, South Carolina, United States
Engine:3.5L V6 24V MPFI DOHC
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): KNDMH4C71E6587761
Stock Num: K503
Make: Kia
Model: Sedona EX
Year: 2014
Exterior Color: Clear White
Interior Color: Beige
Options: Drive Type: FWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Drive this home today! Isn't it time for a Kia?! Tired of the same dull drive? Well change up things with this attractive-looking 2014 Kia Sedona. Life is full of disappointments, but at least this great Kia Sedona will always be there for you and never let you down. As you do your comparison shopping, you will see Stokes Kia offer some of the best values in the market. We will provide you a Carfax, Comprehensive Vehicle Inspection, and how we arrived at the price. We may not be the lowest, but if you want to know who is we will show you that too. Call or Stop by Contact Stokes Kia at 888-823-7294 in Charleston, South Carolina. Excludes tax, tag, registration and title and includes $399.50 Administrative Fee. Prices do not include destination charges, dealer add-ons, tax, license, and does include $399.50 Administration Fees. Come see our exciting new designs, largest SPECIAL selection.EVERY NEW CAR AT INVOICE, PLUS YOU GET THE REBATE...Call today #888-823-7294 to find out more!!!
Kia Sedona for Sale
- 2014 kia sedona lx(US $26,919.00)
- 2014 kia sedona lx(US $26,919.00)
- 2014 kia sedona lx(US $28,724.00)
- 2014 kia sedona lx(US $28,724.00)
- 2014 kia sedona ex(US $31,919.00)
- 2014 kia sedona lx(US $28,724.00)
Auto Services in South Carolina
University Tire and Muffler ★★★★★
Tint Plus of Anderson ★★★★★
Sterling`s Detail ★★★★★
Southern Customs Body Paint Frame & Collision ★★★★★
Southern Automotive ★★★★★
Sisk Family Ford ★★★★★
Auto blog
Honda, Hyundai and Kia get best word-of-mouth recommendations in US
Mon, 09 Dec 2013Forget advertising, incentives and, yes, even our excellently crafted vehicle reviews, sometimes the best way for automakers to sell cars is still good ol' fashioned word of mouth. In an attempt to measure this "word of mouth" power, The Boston Consulting Group, a management consulting firm, has created a new study called the Brand Advocacy Index (BAI). The index takes a look at how various industries perform from person to person. Those industries include automotive, smartphones, grocery, mobile telecommunications and banking.
The study polled more than 32,000 individuals across Europe and in the US to come up with the top 55 brands in these various industries. On the automotive side of things, the top brands in the US were Honda, Hyundai and Kia, all tied at 63 percent. On a global scale, Volkswagen and Toyota scored the highest with a 65-percent BAI rating (both in France). The average BAI for auto industry players tallied 50 percent.
As for companies in other industries, Apple's iPhone was the index's top-rated smartphone, Trader Joe's was the highest recommended grocery store, Virgin was sat atop the mobile telecom industry and USAA was the top retail bank. Scroll down for the full press release on the new study.
Toyota Land Cruiser, GMC Sierra and the long-term fleet | Autoblog Podcast #558
Mon, Oct 22 2018On this week's Autoblog Podcast, Editor-in-Chief Greg Migliore is joined by Consumer Editor Jeremy Korzeniewski. They talk about driving a pair of short-term test cars, the Toyota Land Cruiser and GMC Sierra AT4, as well as two of Autoblog's long-term test cars, the 2018 Kia Stinger GT and 2018 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid. Following the test fleet talk is a discussion of a new program from Lyft and the Chinese-market Ford Territory. And of course everything is wrapped up with yet another Spend My Money segment in which we Autoblog editors help a reader choose a car to buy.Autoblog Podcast #558 Get The Podcast iTunes – Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes RSS – Add the Autoblog Podcast feed to your RSS aggregator MP3 – Download the MP3 directly Rundown Short-term cars: Toyota Land Cruiser and GMC Sierra AT4 Long-term cars: Kia Stinger GT and Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid Lyft subscription program Ford Territory Spend My Money Feedback Email – Podcast@Autoblog.com Review the show on iTunes Related Video: Podcasts Chrysler GMC Kia Toyota toyota land cruiser chrysler pacifica chrysler pacifica hybrid kia stinger gt
Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating
Mon, Aug 6 2018Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.