Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2005 Kia Sedona Ex Mini Passenger Van 5-door 3.5l on 2040-cars

US $2,500.00
Year:2005 Mileage:147000
Location:

Fayetteville, North Carolina, United States

Fayetteville, North Carolina, United States

This is a local vehicle from the Fayetteville, NC area. This is fully loaded with CD, power windows, locks and more. CLEAN TITLE IN HAND!! Call Kevin @ 910-486-9646 or 910-303-8365 with ANY questions. WILL NOT DELIVER MUST PICK UP IN FAYETTEVILLE, NC.

Auto Services in North Carolina

Your Automotive Service Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Diagnostic Service, Automobile Electric Service
Address: 1707 Battleground Ave, Mc-Leansville
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Whistle`s Body Shop ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Truck Body Repair & Painting
Address: 100 Ranch Dr, Mint-Hill
Phone: (704) 882-2033

Village Motor Werks ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 234 S Boylan Ave, Raleigh
Phone: (919) 832-0899

Tyrolf Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services, Alternators & Generators-Automotive Repairing
Address: 7513 Knightdale Blvd, Knightdale
Phone: (919) 217-5621

Turner Towing & Recovery ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Towing, Automotive Roadside Service
Address: Rougemont
Phone: (919) 219-9096

Triangle Auto & Truck Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Truck Service & Repair
Address: 3511 Nc 55 Hwy, Apex
Phone: (919) 467-1376

Auto blog

Kia teases Cross GT concept for Chicago debut

Wed, 30 Jan 2013

Kia is headed to the Chicago Auto Show with a new concept. Details are scarce on the Cross GT at the moment, but we know the machine was penned as a luxury crossover. Larger than the current Sorento, we would wager there's three rows of seating on board. And while it's unclear whether or not Kia plans to bring something similar to market, we like what we see in the shadowy teaser above. The Cross GT seems to wear the company's "tiger nose" styling well, and the familiar D-pillar upkick ties the machine in nicely with the rest of the company's people-movers.
The 2013 Chicago Auto Show kicks off on February 7th, and should feature a number of interesting reveals. Those include the upcoming Toyota Tundra and what could be a special version of the Dodge Dart. Stay tuned for our live coverage on the show floor.

Kia GT to debut in Paris, production in 2017

Mon, Jan 25 2016

After years of waiting, the Kia GT four-door coupe (concept pictured above) could finally debut in production guise at the Paris Motor Show in October, and the brand would start making it in 2017, according to Autocar. The South Korean automaker could also create a hotter variant of the pint-sized Rio in 2018 to give the lineup a dash more performance. Kia debuted the rear-wheel drive GT concept at the 2011 Frankfurt Motor Show, and the svelte four-door offered some speed thanks to a 3.3-liter turbocharged V6 with 389 horsepower and 394 pound-feet of torque and an eight-speed automatic gearbox. Kia seemed primed to build the model several times over the years as a US-focused vehicle, but the latest report hinted that production wouldn't happen until 2017. Autocar claims that the final design incorporates cues from the sporty GT4 Stinger concept. Kia also intends to introduce performance-oriented models with the GT moniker lower in its range. According to Autocar, the Rio GT would ride on the vehicle's lighter next-gen platform and offer about 180 horsepower from a 1.6-liter engine to compete against the Ford Fiesta ST, which already has 197 hp. However, the South Korean automaker might want to consider a more potent powerplant to keep up in the hot hatch arms race, because spy shots already suggest the Blue Oval's development of a Fiesta RS with around 250 hp. Related Video: Featured Gallery Kia GT Concept: Frankfurt 2011 View 13 Photos News Source: AutocarImage Credit: Copyright 2016 Drew Phillips / AOL Design/Style Rumormill Paris Motor Show Kia Hatchback Concept Cars Performance Sedan 2016 paris motor show kia rio kia gt kia gt concept

What do J.D. Power's quality ratings really measure?

Wed, Jun 24 2015

Check these recently released J.D. Power Initial Quality Study (IQS) results. Do they raise any questions in your mind? Premium sports-car maker Porsche sits in first place for the third straight year, so are Porsches really the best-built cars in the U.S. market? Korean brands Kia and Hyundai are second and fourth, so are Korean vehicles suddenly better than their US, European, and Japanese competitors? Are workaday Chevrolets (seventh place) better than premium Buicks (11th), and Buicks better than luxury Cadillacs (21st), even though all are assembled in General Motors plants with the same processes and many shared parts? Are Japanese Acuras (26th) worse than German Volkswagens (24th)? And is "quality" really what it used to be (and what most perceive it to be), a measure of build excellence? Or has it evolved into much more a measure of likeability and ease of use? To properly analyze these widely watched results, we must first understand what IQS actually studies, and what the numerical scores really mean. First, as its name indicates, it's all about "initial" quality, measured by problems reported by new-vehicle owners in their first 90 days of ownership. If something breaks or falls off four months in, it doesn't count here. Second, the scores are problems per 100 vehicles, or PP100. So Power's 2015 IQS industry average of 112 PP100 translates to just 1.12 reported problems per vehicle. Third, no attempt is made to differentiate BIG problems from minor ones. Thus a transmission or engine failure counts the same as a squeaky glove box door, tricky phone pairing, inconsistent voice recognition, or anything else that annoys the owner. Traditionally, a high-quality vehicle is one that is well-bolted together. It doesn't leak, squeak, rattle, shed parts, show gaps between panels, or break down and leave you stranded. By this standard, there are very few poor-quality new vehicles in today's U.S. market. But what "quality" should not mean, is subjective likeability: ease of operation of the radio, climate controls, or seat adjusters, phone pairing, music downloading, sizes of touch pads on an infotainment screen, quickness of system response, or accuracy of voice-recognition. These are ergonomic "human factors" issues, not "quality" problems. Yet these kinds of pleasability issues are now dominating today's JDP "quality" ratings.