Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

Jeep Wrangler Se on 2040-cars

Year:2001 Mileage:86000
Location:

Linville, North Carolina, United States

Linville, North Carolina, United States
Advertising:

 This vehicle was towed by a Prevost coach prior to me purchasing this vehicle in 2011. My family has used it for towing and all tow equipment remains with the Jeep...prepping vehicles for towing can be quite expensive. This vehicle is currently stored in Linville N.C. but I plan to return there in late April and begin using this vehicle for commuting. I did tow it to Zephyrhills Florida in Nov of 2013 and then drove it back in Linville for the Christmas Holidays. We then drove a non-towable car back to where we Winter in Zephyrhills. This vehicle has been well maintained and drives great. However, the A/C has a refrigerant leak which I will have serviced at my expense. This is a very pretty car and would make some young adult very happy. I'm now in my 70's and would like to keep this vehicle but my wife and her daughter find it too uncomfortable. My loss and someone's gain. Let me know if you have any questions. When I return to my Summer home I'll take some additional pictures and post them. The 86000 miles is an estimate but I'm confident it's with 1000 miles of being accurate.

Auto Services in North Carolina

Wheelings Tire ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Brake Repair
Address: 3649 Wilkesboro Blvd, Hudson
Phone: (828) 758-1612

Wasp Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automotive Tune Up Service, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services
Address: 4906 Meadow Dr, Durham
Phone: (919) 929-2886

Viewmont Auto Sales 2 Inc ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 1729 N Center St, Catawba
Phone: (828) 322-3843

Tire Kingdom ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Brake Repair
Address: 68 Asheland Ave, Fletcher
Phone: (828) 225-6088

Thomas Auto World ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers
Address: 4645 S Main St, Hope-Mills
Phone: (910) 425-3662

The Speed Shop ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Performance, Racing & Sports Car Equipment
Address: 2116 A Veasley St, Oak-Ridge
Phone: (336) 324-1519

Auto blog

Feds fretting over remote hack of Jeep Cherokee

Fri, Jul 24 2015

A cyber-security gap that allowed for the remote hacking of a Jeep Cherokee has federal officials concerned. An associate administrator with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said Thursday that news of the breach conducted by researchers Chris Valasek and Charlie Miller had "floated around the entire federal government." "The Homeland Security folks sent out broadcasts that, 'Here's an issue that needs to be addressed,'" said Nathaniel Beuse, an associate administrator with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Valasek and Miller commandeered remote control of the Cherokee through a security flaw in the cellular connection to the car's Uconnect infotainment system. From his Pittsburgh home, Valasek manipulated critical safety inputs, such as transmission function, on Miller's Jeep as he drove along a highway near St. Louis, MO. The scope of the remote breach is believed to be the first of its kind. The prominent cyber-security researchers needed no prior access to the vehicle to perform the hack, and the scope of the remote breach is believed to be the first of its kind. A NHTSA spokesperson said the agency's cyber-security staff members are "putting their expertise to work assessing this threat and the response, and we will take action if we determine it's necessary to protect safety." A Homeland Security spokesperson referred questions about the hack to Chrysler. Fiat Chrysler Automobiles has already been the subject of a federal hearing this month, in which officials scrutinized whether the company had adequately fixed recalled vehicles and repeatedly failed to notify the government about defects. But cyber-security concerns are a new and different species for the regulatory agency. Only hours before the Jeep hack was announced by Wired magazine earlier this week, NHTSA administrator Dr. Mark Rosekind said hacking vulnerabilities were a threat to privacy, safety, and the public's trust with new connected and autonomous technologies that allow vehicles to communicate. NHTSA outlined its response to the cyber-security challenges facing the industry in a report issued Tuesday. In it, the agency summarized its best practices for thwarting attacks and said it will analyze possible real-time infiltration responses. But the agency's ability to handle hackers may only go so far.

Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating

Mon, Aug 6 2018

Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.

NHTSA closes investigation on 4.7M FCA power modules, no recall

Thu, Jul 30 2015

FCA US hasn't had the best time with recalls as of late. Not only did the company recently agree to greater safety oversight and paid $105 million to the government, that came just days after hacking fears prompted a 1.4-million model recall campaign. However, a recent decision to close an investigation by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration means that the automaker doesn't have to worry about another major recall possibly affecting 4.7 million vehicles, according to the agency's report (as a PDF). Last September, the Center for Auto Safety petitioned NHTSA to investigate an alleged problem with the totally integrated power module (TIPM) on these FCA US models. The group claimed that a fault with the component could cause a variety of maladies, including stalls, not starting, catching fire, unintended acceleration, and airbag non-deployment. At the time, it also submitted 70 cases where this had reportedly happened. According to NHTSA, "no valid evidence was presented in support of claims related to airbag non-deployment, unintended acceleration, or fire resulting from TIPM faults and these claims were found to be wholly without merit based on review of the field data and design of the relevant systems and components." The agency did find signs of an issue with the fuel pump relay in some Jeep Grand Cherokees and Dodge Durangos, but FCA US issued recalls for the problem in September 2014 and February 2015. Without anything else to go on, the Feds don't think it's worth investigating this topic any more.