Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2012 Rubicon 3.6l Black Clearcoat on 2040-cars

Year:2012 Mileage:0 Color: Black /
 Black
Location:

Thomson, Georgia, United States

Thomson, Georgia, United States
Transmission:Automatic
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:3.6L 3604CC 220Cu. In. V6 GAS DOHC Naturally Aspirated
Body Type:Sport Utility
Fuel Type:GAS
VIN: 1C4BJWCG5CL214888 Year: 2012
Interior Color: Black
Make: Jeep
Model: Wrangler
Warranty: Vehicle has an existing warranty
Trim: Rubicon Sport Utility 2-Door
Number of Doors: 2
Drive Type: 4WD
Mileage: 0
Number of Cylinders: 6
Exterior Color: Black
Condition: New: A vehicle is considered new if it is purchased directly from a new car franchise dealer and has not yet been registered and issued a title. New vehicles are covered by a manufacturer's new car warranty and are sold with a window sticker (also known as a “Monroney Sticker”) and a Manufacturer's Statement of Origin. These vehicles have been driven only for demonstration purposes and should be in excellent running condition with a pristine interior and exterior. See the seller's listing for full details.  ... 

Auto Services in Georgia

ZBest Cars ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers, New Truck Dealers
Address: 3280 Commerce Ave, North-Metro
Phone: (888) 862-8501

Woody Butts Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers
Address: 1500 College St, Eastman
Phone: (478) 374-3909

Williamson`s Used Cars Inc ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers, New Truck Dealers
Address: 871 W Liberty Ave, Lyons
Phone: (912) 526-0045

Watson Transmissions ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 1747 W Gordon St, Valdosta
Phone: (229) 245-0110

Ward`s Auto Paint & Bodyworks ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: Richmond-Hill
Phone: (912) 966-1028

Walker`s Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Detailing, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 2911 N Patterson St, Remerton
Phone: (229) 219-1114

Auto blog

Wrangler Pickup, Triumph Fined, Cherokee Production Moves | Autoblog Minute

Sat, Sep 5 2015

"Autoblog senior editor Greg Migliore reports on highlights from the week in automotive news. " UAW/Unions Jeep Autoblog Minute Videos Original Video FCA recap

2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee pricing leaks out

Thu, 24 Jan 2013

With our deep dive and auto show coverage of the 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee revealed at the Detroit Auto Show, we brought you as much information as Chrysler would allow us to, but one thing we're still left in the dark about was the pricing. It would seem that Jeep Garage might have the answer for that. The Jeep enthusiast forum claims to have gotten its hands on the ordering and pricing breakdown for the updated Grand Cherokee, and while a Jeep representative has yet to get back to us as to the validity of the site's claim, these preliminary numbers look pretty kosher to us.
In base form, the two-wheel-drive Laredo will reportedly start at $28,795, which is a $1,100 increase over the 2013 model year, and the new Grand Cherokee Summit trim level starts at $47,995 for 4x2 models and $50,995 for the 4x4. Waiting for the new diesel engine? The torquey new 3.0-liter oil-burner will be a $4,500 option on Limited, Overland and Summit 4x4 models, but 4x2 pricing (and availability) are not known. As for the range-topping Grand Cherokee SRT (no longer called the SRT8), this added performance could run you an extra $2,700 with a new starting price of $62,995. More importantly, loaded to the gills with all available options, the 2014 Grand Cherokee SRT will top out at around $72,400 - or around $6,000 more than a fully loaded 2013 GC SRT8.
We'll let you know if the gang over at Jeep get back to us with any confirmation, but until then, head over to Jeep Garage to see the pricing details it has listed.

Georgia jury awards $150 million in Jeep fire case

Fri, Apr 3 2015

FCA US continues to fight allegations that some Jeep Grand Cherokee and Liberty sport-utility vehicles are unsafe because of the possibility of fires in rear-end collisions. In one recently decided case, a jury in Georgia awarded $150 million in damages to a family whose child died in a blaze in 2012 in a 1999 Grand Cherokee. The jury believed that FCA acted with "reckless and wanton disregard," and didn't do enough to warn owners, according to Reuters. The automaker was found liable for 99 percent of the damages, and the remaining one percent was for the driver who rear-ended the family's SUV. In a statement from FCA US, the company said that it is considering an appeal. Under Georgia law, the automaker was allegedly unable to present a three-year investigation of rear-impact data to jurors. This was the same information the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration used to decide that the '99 Grand Cherokee "did not pose an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety." The original recall for the models covered 1.56 million examples of the 2002-2007 Liberty and 1993-1998 Grand Cherokee. With the fuel tank located between the rear axle and bumper, NHTSA and FCA eventually agreed to install a trailer hitch for extra protection. A further 1.2 million 1999-2004 Grand Cherokees owners received notice of a customer service action to have their vehicles inspected, though no hitch installed. Subsequent tests showed this remedy to be effective for impacts below 40 miles per hour. The automaker has maintained the SUVs met the applicable safety standards of the period when they were built. The company was chastised by NHTSA last year for low repair rates of the problem. FCA US LLC Statement Regarding Walden v Chrysler Group Verdict: April 2, 2015 , Auburn Hills, Mich. - FCA US is disappointed and will consider an appeal of this verdict. It is unfortunate that under Georgia Law the jury was prevented from taking into account extensive data submitted to NHTSA during a three year investigation, which included more than 20 years of rear impact accident data for tens of millions of vehicles. This and other information provided the basis for NHTSA's determination that the 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee did not pose an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety.