2006 Jeep Wrangler X 4x4 Only 49k Miles Stop Buy & Check This Deal Out Today!!! on 2040-cars
Yonkers, New York, United States
Body Type:Convertible
Vehicle Title:Rebuilt, Rebuildable & Reconstructed
Engine:4.0L 242Cu. In. l6 GAS OHV Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Dealer
Make: Jeep
Model: Wrangler
Trim: X Sport Utility 2-Door
Options: 4-Wheel Drive, CD Player, Convertible
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes
Drive Type: 4WD
Power Options: Air Conditioning
Mileage: 49,829
Exterior Color: White
Interior Color: Gray
Disability Equipped: No
Number of Cylinders: 6
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Please look at all pictures as well as read this auction fully before bidding.
Now up for auction we have a 2006 Jeep Wrangler X 4x4 convertible (sorry we do not have the hardtop for this one!) with only 49,829 miles. This is a super clean truck that you can fly in and drive home with the top down, or turn on the ice cold a/c and keep the top up! The condition of this Wrangler is as follows. Interior: Super clean, showing minimal wear at best considering the year and mileage on her. Overall above average. Body: Shines and still shows great, the right 1/4 panel has a dent on her (see pics), but you really have to look to see ( I missed it the first go around), and the soft top has a rip in her 1-2 inches on the passenger side. But overall a good looking Jeep. Mechanically: Like I said you can fly in and drive home, she is mechanically sound. Please remember your bid is a contract, please treat it as such. We are a licensed NY state dealer (facility# 7109629), New York state residents will need to pay NY tax, this does not apply to out of state residents. This Wrangler is being sold as is, we would like her paid for as well as removed within 10 days of the close of this auction. You can call me with any questions at 914-968-0066x124 (Billy D). This Wrangler has a NY revin number, so I had to list it as a 1980 for it to be entered for auction. It is a 2006 Jeep with a new vin number. With all that being said, thanks for looking and good luck bidding to all.
Jeep Wrangler for Sale
- Starwood custom, 4 lift, 35 tires,lifted off road wheels, kevlar coated(US $49,038.00)
- 2006 jeep wrangler 65th anniversary edition sport utility 2-door 4.0l
- 1998 jeep wrangler sahara 2-door 4.0l - one of a kind! project crosstrainer!
- 1997 jeep wrangler se sport utility 2-door 2.5l(US $7,350.00)
- 2012 jeep wrangler utility sahara 4wd(US $29,444.00)
- 2007 jeep wrangler unlimited sahara(US $18,999.00)
Auto Services in New York
Zona Automotive ★★★★★
Zima Tire Supply ★★★★★
Worlds Best Auto, Inc ★★★★★
Vip Honda ★★★★★
VIP Auto Group ★★★★★
Village Line Auto Body ★★★★★
Auto blog
Which electric cars can charge at a Tesla Supercharger?
Sun, Jul 9 2023The difference between Tesla charging and non-Tesla charging. Electrify America; Tesla Tesla's advantage has long been its charging technology and Supercharger network. Now, more and more automakers are switching to Tesla's charging tech. But there are a few things non-Tesla drivers need to know about charging at a Tesla station. A lot has hit the news cycle in recent months with regard to electric car drivers and where they can and can't plug in. The key factor in all of that? Whether automakers switched to Tesla's charging standard. More car companies are shifting to Tesla's charging tech in the hopes of boosting their customers' confidence in going electric. Here's what it boils down to: If you currently drive a Tesla, you can keep charging at Tesla charging locations, which use the company's North American Charging Standard (NACS), which has long served it well. The chargers are thinner, more lightweight and easier to wrangle than other brands. If you currently drive a non-Tesla EV, you have to charge at a non-Tesla charging station like that of Electrify America or EVgo — which use the Combined Charging System (CCS) — unless you stumble upon a Tesla charger already equipped with the Magic Dock adapter. For years, CCS tech dominated EVs from everyone but Tesla. Starting next year, if you drive a non-Tesla EV (from the automakers that have announced they'll make the switch), you'll be able to charge at all Supercharger locations with an adapter. And by 2025, EVs from some automakers won't even need an adaptor. Here's how to charge up, depending on which EV you have: Ford 2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E. Tim Levin/Insider Ford was the earliest traditional automaker to team up with Tesla for its charging tech. Current Ford EV owners — those driving a Ford electric vehicle already fitted with a CCS port — will be able to use a Tesla-developed adapter to access Tesla Superchargers starting in the spring. That means that, if you own a Mustang Mach-E or Ford F-150 Lightning, you will need the adapter in order to use a Tesla station come 2024. But Ford will equip its future EVs with the NACS port starting in 2025 — eliminating the need for any adapter. Owners of new Ford EVs will be able to pull into a Supercharger station and juice up, no problem. General Motors Cadillac Lyriq. Cadillac GM will also allow its EV drivers to plug into Tesla stations.
Autoblog Podcast #413
Thu, Jan 15 2015Episode #413 of the Autoblog Podcast is here, and this week, Dan Roth, Chris Paukert, and Brandon Turkus recap all of the big debuts that took place this week at the 2015 North American International Auto Show in Detroit. Of course, the podcast starts with what's in the garage and finishes up with some of your questions, and for those of you who hung with us live on our UStream channel, thanks for taking the time. Check out the rundown with times for topics, and you can follow along down below with our Q&A. Thanks for listening! Autoblog Podcast #413 The video meant to be presented here is no longer available. Sorry for the inconvenience. Topics 2015 Detroit Auto Show In The Autoblog Garage 2015 Chevrolet Trax 2015 Audi RS 5 2015 Ford F-150 Long-Term 2014 Jeep Cherokee Hosts: Dan Roth, Chris Paukert, Brandon Turkus Runtime: 01:xx:xx Rundown Intro and Garage - 00:00 2015 Detroit Auto Show – 37:49 Q&A - 01:32:48 Get The Podcast UStream – Listen live on Mondays at 10 PM Eastern at UStream iTunes – Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes RSS – Add the Autoblog Podcast feed to your RSS aggregator MP3 – Download the MP3 directly Feedback Email – Podcast at Autoblog dot com Review the show in iTunes
FCA seeking new trial in Jeep fire case, calls $150M judgement 'grossly excessive'
Sat, May 9 2015Fiat Chrysler Automobiles is fighting back after a Decatur County, GA jury ordered the company to pay $150 million to the family of a four-year-old boy that was killed after a 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee crashed and caught fire. The company is requesting the judge reduce the award, and should Walden's family not agree to the lower sum, that a new trial be held. The Detroit Free Press reports that FCA would be forced to pay $120 million over the death of young Remington Walden, with an extra $30 million being paid to the boy's family. Neither figure sits well with the automaker, though, which called the fine "grossly excessive," and claimed it was in violation of Georgia state law. The judgment stems from FCA's long-running problem with the fuel tanks of certain Jeep models built in the 1990s and 2000s. According to the newspaper, FCA argues that the jury was biased after the Waldens' attorneys played on the their passions and pushed for a big award, saying the wrongful death award was 11 times more than any appeals court has ever upheld. FCA said attorneys for the plaintiffs told the jury to base the settlement on Sergio Marchionne's total compensation, $68 million. FCA also claims in its motion that the young boy's suffering was brief. "A $30-million pain-and-suffering award for what plaintiffs acknowledge was at most one minute of suffering is irrational," the motion, which was obtained by The Detroit Free Press, read. "Where such plainly improper arguments are immediately followed by irrational and stunningly excessive damage awards, there can be no doubt that the jury acted from passion and prejudice." Jim Butler, the attorney for the Waldens, has called the motion "nonsense," although he said the family will accept whatever figure the judge sets.