1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee Laredo Sport Utility 4-door 5.2l, No Reserve on 2040-cars
Orange, California, United States
Engine:5.2L 5211CC 318Cu. In. V8 GAS OHV Naturally Aspirated
Transmission:Automatic
Vehicle Title:Clear
Body Type:Sport Utility
Make: Jeep
Mileage: 218,644
Model: Grand Cherokee
Exterior Color: Burgundy
Trim: Laredo Sport Utility 4-Door
Interior Color: Tan
Drive Type: 4WD
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Number of Cylinders: 8
Jeep Grand Cherokee for Sale
- Laredo suv 3.7l cd 4 wheel disc brakes abs brakes am/fm radio air conditioning(US $11,846.00)
- 2004 jeep grand cherokee laredo 4x4, sunroof, 2 owner, clean carfax, no reserve
- 2012 jeep grand cherokee limited 4x4 we finance(US $34,500.00)
- 2005 jeep grand cherokee laredo 4x4
- 2011 jeep grand cherokee laredo navigation leather 4x4(US $26,995.00)
- 4x4 26x package e-group 20's navigation moonroof 1-owner warranty(US $32,900.00)
Auto Services in California
Zip Auto Glass Repair ★★★★★
Z D Motorsports ★★★★★
Young Automotive ★★★★★
XACT WINDOW TINTING & 3M CLEAR BRA PAINT PROTECTION ★★★★★
Woodland Hills Honda ★★★★★
West Valley Machine Shop ★★★★★
Auto blog
Jeep going bigger with new Grand Wagoneer, smaller with sub-Renegade?
Tue, 11 Mar 2014The headlines are still rolling in for the new Renegade that Jeep unveiled at the Geneva Motor Show last week, but already reports are surfacing, citing sources within the company, about what Chrysler's iconic off-road brand will do next.
Speaking with Auto Express (whose reports we tend to take with a grain of salt or two), Jeep chief Mike Manley suggested that two courses of action are currently under consideration at Auburn Hills to develop two very different new models - one smaller and one larger than anything Jeep currently makes.
One plan would be to make an SUV or crossover even smaller than the new Renegade, although it isn't immediately clear what platform it would take. The Renegade (pictured above in Trailhawk spec) will be built in Italy alongside Fiat's upcoming 500X, but uses a heavily modified platform. We figure the smaller model, if approved, could base itself on the new Fiat Panda Cross.
NHTSA upgrading Jeep Grand Cherokee, Dodge Durango headliner fire probe
Wed, 15 Jan 2014The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration investigation into headliner fires experienced by a small number of Jeep Grand Cherokee and Dodge Durango owners has been upgraded to an engineering analysis, the step before the initiation of a recall. In August last year the investigation began with 146,000 Grand Cherokees from 2012 after three complaints were received, but a report on Edmunds says it has been expanded to include 593,299 vehicles covering the 2011-2013 model years for the Jeep and the Dodge Durango, which uses the same headliner assembly, because of possibly 52 incidents of fire.
In some of those incidents drivers have reported a burning odor, smoke or open flames that were contained to the headliner or migrated to another area of the passenger compartment. The culprit has apparently been found: NHTSA blaming an electrical short in the sun visor vanity light wiring, which is routed under the headliner and held in place by three screws. Chrysler began its own probe into the issue when it was first reported and is still looking into the situation while, "fully supporting the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's investigation."
25,000 Jeep Grand Cherokee, Dodge Durango SUVs recalled over brake feel
Mon, 10 Mar 2014Chrysler has announced that it is recalling over 25,000 Jeep Grand Cherokee and Dodge Durango SUVs from several markets over concerns about brake feel under hard braking. The affected models are from the 2012 and 2013 model years, although the actual dates of production aren't available. 18,700 are in the US, while 825 are in Canada, 530 are in Mexico and a further 5,200 outside of North America.
According to a statement, Chrysler was informed of the issue by a component supplier for the Ready Alert Braking system, which primes the brakes in anticipation of an emergency stop. A component in the system was restricting the flow of brake fluid too much.
As Chrysler is quick to point out, the way the brakes functioned was in compliance with regulations and there are no reported cases of drivers losing braking power. Instead, the issue rests with what Chrysler calls a pedal feel that "was not consistent with customer expectations." So it would seem Chrysler is being proactive and fixing a problem not because there's a legal issue at work, but simply because it doesn't feel the way the manufacturer wants it to. Well done.