1977 Cj5 on 2040-cars
Yucaipa, California, United States
Engine:258 cu in (4.2 liter)
Body Type:Convertible
Vehicle Title:Clear
Exterior Color: White
Make: Jeep
Interior Color: Black
Model: CJ
Number of Cylinders: 6
Trim: 5
Drive Type: 4x4
Mileage: 109,000
This is your opportunity to own a clean, fun to drive Jeep without spending tons of money and endless hours of work. She has a newly rebuilt motor , new paint, new seats front and new fold and tumble rear seat. (Seat covers are there just for protection). It has new tie rods and alignment still under warranty. The 4x4 equipt is perfect and It has the full roll cage, Nerf bars, the tires are brand new,and so is the stereo. It just passed smog with flying colors and it is super cute. I has the 4.2 inline 6 cyl (258 cu in )and the standard 3 speed trans. No leaks on the garage floor at all. For those who have never driven a CJ before it is different than a new style Jeep. No power steering or power brakes and for A/C you take the top off. Don't expect a SUV ride, or even a 2013 wrangler ride. This is an old school Jeep but since it is basically stock the ride is pretty good really. The gas gauge stopped working last week, not sure why. Speedometer and other gauges work fine. Buyer must inspect and pay for in person No brokers, agents or dealers. Cash payment . Local only, No shipping ..
Now it is already a great deal but when you also consider she has the hard to find hard top and hard doors for those cold winter months its a must have. Jeep is not perfect or show quality. It is not a rock crawler,just a good clean basic uncut and unmolested 36 year old Jeep .Engine rebuilt by previous owner less than 2,000 miles ago but I do not have any paper work on that to prove it .You can see the new parts on top and bottom of engine and it runs strong, passed ca smog with great numbers. Also has new Carburator, alt, fuel pump, battery, etc.
When looking at CJ's ask yourself how much will it cost to get it in the same shape then save money and time come buy this one.
The only reason we are selling it is we need something bigger to take our four grandkids 4 wheeling.
$6,400.00 or may consider trade up or down for Bronco or Blazer in great condition. Mastiff Puppy not included.
Jeep CJ for Sale
- Jeep cj7 1976(US $5,500.00)
- 1963 willys jeep cj5 all original
- 1980 jeep cj 5 laredo
- 1981 jeep cj7 renegade..6cyl,t18 4spd,dana 300 t-case, 3 tops, rust free mopar!(US $7,000.00)
- Cj7 1978(US $10,500.00)
Auto Services in California
Zip Auto Glass Repair ★★★★★
Woodland Motors Chevrolet Buick Cadillac GMC ★★★★★
Willy`s Auto Repair Shop ★★★★★
Westside Body & Paint ★★★★★
Westcoast Autobahn ★★★★★
Westcoast Auto Sales ★★★★★
Auto blog
Chrysler's Jefferson North plant builds 5-millionth SUV [w/video]
Thu, 15 Aug 2013Chrysler's Jefferson North Assembly Plant opened in 1992 for production of the first Jeep Grand Cherokee, but in the subsequent years, the Detroit plant has gone on to produce some of the company's biggest SUVs including the Jeep Commander and Dodge Durango. Earlier this week, the plant produced its five-millionth SUV, which, fittingly, was a Grand Cherokee.
Celebrating the plant's five-millionth unit, the silver 2014 Grand Cherokee was promptly donated to the USO. In addition to this milestone SUV, Chrysler also had a near-perfect 1993-95 ZJ Grand Cherokee on hand for the photo op. Scroll down for the Chrysler press release as well as a video showing some of the speeches from the celebration.
Jeep Grand Cherokee in headliner fire probe
Fri, 23 Aug 2013The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is launching an investigation into 146,000 Jeep Grand Cherokee SUVs from the 2012 model year, The Detroit News reports. This comes as the result of the government safety agency receiving three complaints from owners who cited fires inside the Jeep's cabin.
According to the report, NHTSA says:
"The customers reported a burning odor and visible smoke coming from the headliner while the vehicle was being driven. This was followed by flames from the headliner itself. Customers lowered the windows in an effort to clear the smoke but this increased the fire's intensity. All three vehicles had to be extinguished with a fire extinguisher or by the fire department as they continued to burn after the vehicle was turned off."
Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating
Mon, Aug 6 2018Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.