2023 Jeep Wagoneer Series Iii 4x4 on 2040-cars
Bullhead City, Arizona, United States
Engine:3.0L I6 Hurricane SO Twin Turbo ESS
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Body Type:Sport Utility
Transmission:8-Spd Auto 8HP75 Trans (Buy-US)
For Sale By:Dealer
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1C4SJVDP5PS584162
Mileage: 32
Make: Jeep
Trim: Series III 4X4
Drive Type: Series III 4x4
Features: 3.92 REAR AXLE RATIO, CONVENIENCE GROUP I, ENGINE: 3.0L I6 HURRICANE SO TWIN TURBO ESS, FRONT PASSENGER INTERACTIVE DISPLAY, GLOBAL BLACK, LEATHER TRIMMED BUCKET SEATS, HD TRAILER TOW PACKAGE, PREFERRED EQUIPMENT GROUP, QUICK ORDER PACKAGE 25N, TIRES: 275/55R20 BSW ALL SEASON (TTG), TRANSMISSION: 8-SPEED AUTOMATIC (8HP75), WHEELS: 20" X 9.0" ALUMINUM
Power Options: --
Exterior Color: River Rock
Interior Color: Black
Warranty: Unspecified
Model: Wagoneer
Jeep Wagoneer for Sale
- 1991 jeep wagoneer(US $55,000.00)
- 2024 jeep wagoneer(US $70,635.00)
- 1988 jeep wagoneer(US $24,900.00)
- 2024 jeep wagoneer series ii 4x4(US $69,391.00)
- 2022 jeep wagoneer series iii 4x4(US $63,297.00)
- 1987 jeep wagoneer limited(US $500.00)
Auto Services in Arizona
yourcarguyaz.com ★★★★★
VW & Audi Independent Service and Repair Specialist ★★★★★
USA Auto Glass Repair ★★★★★
Truck And Trailer Parts Incorporated ★★★★★
Tony`s Auto Repair ★★★★★
TintAZ.com Mobile Window Tinting ★★★★★
Auto blog
2014 North American Car and Truck/Utility of the Year finalists announced [w/poll]
Tue, 10 Dec 2013The 2014 North American International Auto Show is right around the corner, which means it's high time we found out which cars and trucks would be finalists for the prestigious North American Car and Truck/Utility of the Year awards.
The finalists - three in cars and three in three trucks/utilities - are dominated by American brands, with two-thirds of the finalists hailing from either General Motors or Chrysler (don't worry Ford, there's always next year), while outliers from Mazda and Acura can be found in each contest. Here now is the list of finalists for the big prizes:
2014 North American Car of the Year:
Lexus gets top brand marks from Consumer Reports; Ford, Jeep hit hard
Tue, 25 Feb 2014Consumer Reports has released its 2014 Car Brand Report Cards, with Lexus again reigning at the top and doing so with the same industry-topping score of 79 that it registered in last year's Report Cards. This year, the institute credited its lineup for being "usually quiet, comfortable, and fuel-efficient," noting it's the only brand on the list "to achieve an excellent average overall reliability score." The Car Brand Report Cars list is meant to rank the best all-around vehicles based on CR testing and reliability results tallied by subscribers it surveyed. Each brand included must have sufficient test and reliability data for at least three models, a standard which left out 11 marques including Fiat, Jaguar, Land Rover and Porsche.
This 2014 Brand Report Cars edition is the first of a new format in which sub-brands have been broken out from their parent brands, with Acura using this year to move up the leaderboard into second place with a score of 75 for its "reliable, well-finished and somewhat sporty models." The top three was rounded out by Audi, climbing from eighth to third by scoring a 74 for "well-crafted interiors, nice handling and good gas mileage." Audi scored highest in the road-test portion, its improved reliability aiding its rise. The top nine was completed by Subaru, Toyota, Mazda, Honda, Infiniti and Mercedes-Benz.
Ford and Jeep weighed in at the other end of the rankings, Jeep taking the lowest overall score in the road tests and hampered by "a mix of spotty reliability." Ford was sunk by reliability issues with its MyFord Touch infotainment system which consumers found troublesome enough to negate its cars earning "solid test scores" for being "very nice to drive." Perhaps the rumored switch from Microsoft to Blackberry's QNX for the next generation SYNC will help them out. Cadillac's score also took a hit for infotainment reasons after it was the leading US brand last year, the CUE system in the XTS dragging Cadillac to the bottom of all General Motors brands.
Lexus tops JD Power Vehicle Dependability Study again, Buick bests Toyota
Wed, Feb 25 2015It shouldn't surprise anyone, but Lexus has once again taken the top spot in JD Power's Vehicle Dependability Study. That'd be the Japanese luxury brand's fourth straight year at the top of table. The big news, though, is the rise of Buick. General Motor's near-premium brand beat out Toyota to take second place, with 110 problems per 100 vehicles compared to Toyota's 111 problems. Lexus owners only reported 89 problems per 100 vehicles. Besides Buick's three-position jump, Scion enjoyed a major improvement, jumping 13 positions from 2014. Ram and Mitsubishi made big gains, as well, moving up 11 and 10 positions, respectively. In terms of individual segments, GM and Toyota both excelled, taking home seven segment awards each. The study wasn't good news for all involved, though. A number of popular automakers finished below the industry average of 147 problems per 100 vehicles, including Subaru, (157PP100), Volkswagen (165PP100), Ford/Hyundai (188PP100 each) and Mini (193PP100). The biggest losers (by a tremendous margin, we might add) were Land Rover and Fiat, recording 258 and 273 problems per 100 vehicles. The next closest brand was Jeep, with 197PP100. While the Vehicle Dependability Study uses the same measurement system as the Initial Quality Survey, the two metrics analyze very different things. The VDS looks at problems experienced by original owners of model year 2012 vehicles over the past 12 months, while the oft-quoted IQS focuses on problems in the first 90 days of new-vehicle ownership. Like the IQS, though, the VDS has a rather broad definition of what a problem is. Because of that, a low score from JD Power is no guarantee of extreme unreliability, so much as just poor design. In this most recent study, the two most reported problems focused on Bluetooth connectivity and the voice-command systems. The former leaves plenty of room for user error due to poor design (particularly true of the Bluetooth systems on the low-scoring Fords, Volkswagens and Subarus), while the second is something JD Power has already confirmed as being universally terrible. That makes means that while these studies are important, they shouldn't be taken as gospel when it comes to automotive reliability. News Source: JD PowerImage Credit: Copyright 2015 Jeremy Korzeniewski / AOL Buick Fiat Ford GM Hyundai Jeep Land Rover Lexus MINI Mitsubishi RAM Scion Subaru Toyota Volkswagen Auto Repair Ownership study