Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1967 Jeep Jeepster Cammando on 2040-cars

US $6,000.00
Year:1967 Mileage:125365 Color: Red /
 Gray
Location:

Park City, Utah, United States

Park City, Utah, United States
Engine:V-6
Transmission:Manual
Vehicle Title:Clear
Year: 1967
Mileage: 125,365
Make: Jeep
Exterior Color: Red
Model: Commando
Interior Color: Gray
Trim: no
Number of Cylinders: 6
Drive Type: 4x4
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

1967 Jeep Jeepster Commando 4X4


Original V-6 and 3 speed manual trans

Original Hardtop

Has CJ-5 hood and grill on it. Also have Jeepster Hood & Grill

New Seats

Arizona car


Data for Kaiser Jeepster Commando Wagon Dauntless V6, model year 1967, version for North America U.S. with 3-door wagon body type, 4x4 part-time (rear permanent, front engaged manually in off-road conditions) and manual 3-speed gearbox. Basic www.automobile-catalog.com specs and characteristics: petrol (gasoline) engine of 3692 cm3 / 225.3 cui displacement with advertised power 119 kW / 160 hp / 162 PS ( SAE gross ) / 4200 and 319 Nm / 235 lb-ft / 2400 of torque. Dimensions: this model outside length is 4277 mm / 168.4 in, it’s 1656 mm / 65.2 in wide and has wheelbase of 2565 mm / 101 in. The value of a drag coefficient, estimated by a-c, is Cd = 0.7 . Standard wheels were fitted with the tires size: (see standard and alternative tire sizes ...). Reference vehicle weights are: estimated curb weight 1460 kg / 3220 lbs, gross weight GVWR 1905 kg / 4200 lbs. How fast is that car ? Performance: top speed 144 km/h (89 mph) (theoretical); accelerations 0- 60 mph 12.7 s; 0- 100 km/h 13.7 s (a-c simulation); 1/4 mile drag time (402 m) 18.9 s (a-c simulation

Runs good,

Call

435-649-5368

Auto Services in Utah

Vince Quang Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 4149 S Main St, Bingham-Canyon
Phone: (801) 293-9319

Tunex ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories
Address: 4090 Highland Dr, Cottonwood
Phone: (801) 278-0429

Transmission City ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission, Brake Repair
Address: 8324 S 700 E, South-Jordan
Phone: (801) 316-3360

Tom Nunley`s Trucks ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers
Address: 9015 S State St, Sandy
Phone: (801) 255-0069

Stephen Wade Chrysler Jeep ★★★★★

New Car Dealers
Address: 184 W 1600 S, Saint-George
Phone: (435) 634-4200

Sierra RV ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Motor Homes, Recreational Vehicles & Campers-Wholesale & Manufacturers
Address: 1200 N Main St N, Uintah
Phone: (801) 896-9481

Auto blog

What's really going on with the 2014 Jeep Cherokee's transmission issues?

Fri, 27 Sep 2013

On September 23, Automotive News reported that Chrysler had idled the second shift workers it hired just five weeks prior at its Toledo Assembly Complex to build the 2014 Jeep Cherokee. At the time, Chrysler said it had "built the critical number of vehicles we need to stock dealerships once containment is released" and did not want "to put additional strain on our logistics partners ... upon release." That reasoning was not only unusual, it didn't seem to make sense.
It appears the center of the nine-speed issue is software, not hardware.
That same day, the Detroit News ran a piece claiming workers at the Toledo factory said the halt was due to issues with the Cherokee's transmission. It put the number of already-built Cherokees needing fixes at 1,000 and said that some of the workers not laid off had been instructed "to take the Jeep on long test-drives." That made more sense. Three days later, on September 26, Automotive News reported that the 500 workers laid off had been reinstated, with engineers "speeding repairs on the SUV's powertrain software." The AN piece didn't put a number on how many units are being fixed, but it did say that 12,000 have been built and are awaiting delivery to dealers. The best it could say about when dealers will get them, however, is that "progress on a fix is being made. It's unclear when shipments to dealers will start."

Dongfeng and PSA extend Chinese joint venture

Thu, Dec 19 2019

BEIJING/PARIS — China's Dongfeng and Peugeot maker PSA are extending their business cooperation, despite the Chinese company reducing its stake in PSA to help smooth the French carmaker's merger with Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (FCA). Dongfeng said on Thursday it had agreed with PSA to extend the duration of their joint venture Dongfeng Peugeot Citroen Automobiles (DPCA). Under the deal, the venture could get the rights to PSA's new brands in China and will benefit from new technologies and intellectual properties, the Chinese company said. PSA was not immediately available for comment. The announcement comes a day after the companies said Dongfeng would reduce its 12.2% stake in PSA by selling 30.7 million shares to the French company. Analysts said the move could smooth U.S. regulatory approval for PSA's roughly $50 billion (GBP38.97 billion) merger with Italian-American carmaker FCA. The sale of Dongfeng's shares in PSA, worth around 680 million euros ($757 million), will leave the Chinese group holding around 4.5% of the merged PSA-FCA, which is set to become the world's fourth-biggest carmaker by sales volumes. "As the cooperation between Dongfeng and PSA deepens, we expect the joint venture to continue making good progress in China," a Dongfeng representative said. On a conference call, Dongfeng said DPCA would have exclusive rights to PSA's Opel cars should the partners agree to bring the brand to China, and enjoy lower prices on car parts imported from PSA. Earlier this year, a document seen by Reuters showed Dongfeng and PSA plan to cut jobs at Wuhan-based DPCA and reduce its number of car plants to try to make the venture more profitable. Chrysler Dodge Fiat Jeep RAM Citroen Peugeot China FCA PSA Dongfeng

Lexus tops JD Power Vehicle Dependability Study again, Buick bests Toyota

Wed, Feb 25 2015

It shouldn't surprise anyone, but Lexus has once again taken the top spot in JD Power's Vehicle Dependability Study. That'd be the Japanese luxury brand's fourth straight year at the top of table. The big news, though, is the rise of Buick. General Motor's near-premium brand beat out Toyota to take second place, with 110 problems per 100 vehicles compared to Toyota's 111 problems. Lexus owners only reported 89 problems per 100 vehicles. Besides Buick's three-position jump, Scion enjoyed a major improvement, jumping 13 positions from 2014. Ram and Mitsubishi made big gains, as well, moving up 11 and 10 positions, respectively. In terms of individual segments, GM and Toyota both excelled, taking home seven segment awards each. The study wasn't good news for all involved, though. A number of popular automakers finished below the industry average of 147 problems per 100 vehicles, including Subaru, (157PP100), Volkswagen (165PP100), Ford/Hyundai (188PP100 each) and Mini (193PP100). The biggest losers (by a tremendous margin, we might add) were Land Rover and Fiat, recording 258 and 273 problems per 100 vehicles. The next closest brand was Jeep, with 197PP100. While the Vehicle Dependability Study uses the same measurement system as the Initial Quality Survey, the two metrics analyze very different things. The VDS looks at problems experienced by original owners of model year 2012 vehicles over the past 12 months, while the oft-quoted IQS focuses on problems in the first 90 days of new-vehicle ownership. Like the IQS, though, the VDS has a rather broad definition of what a problem is. Because of that, a low score from JD Power is no guarantee of extreme unreliability, so much as just poor design. In this most recent study, the two most reported problems focused on Bluetooth connectivity and the voice-command systems. The former leaves plenty of room for user error due to poor design (particularly true of the Bluetooth systems on the low-scoring Fords, Volkswagens and Subarus), while the second is something JD Power has already confirmed as being universally terrible. That makes means that while these studies are important, they shouldn't be taken as gospel when it comes to automotive reliability. News Source: JD PowerImage Credit: Copyright 2015 Jeremy Korzeniewski / AOL Buick Fiat Ford GM Hyundai Jeep Land Rover Lexus MINI Mitsubishi RAM Scion Subaru Toyota Volkswagen Auto Repair Ownership study