2000 Jeep Wranlger Sr * 4x4 * Only 78k Extra Clean No Reserve on 2040-cars
Waterbury, Connecticut, United States
Jeep Comanche for Sale
2010 jeep wrangler unltd sport 4door 4x4 auto hard top texas direct auto(US $24,780.00)
2008 jeep wrangler unltd x convertible 4x4 auto 43k mi texas direct auto(US $23,980.00)
2007 jeep wrangler unltd sahara 4-door 4x4 auto nav 67k texas direct auto(US $21,480.00)
2011 jeep wrangler unltd sport hard top 4x4 auto 60k mi texas direct auto(US $20,980.00)
1988 jeep comanche pioneer standard cab pickup 2-door 4bt cummins diesel
1989 jeep comanche pioneer pickup 2 wheel drive low miles no reserve
Auto Services in Connecticut
Tires Plus Brakes LLC ★★★★★
T & F Collision Service Inc ★★★★★
Stevens Of Milford ★★★★★
Roy Motors ★★★★★
Premier Subaru ★★★★★
Payless Auto Glass ★★★★★
Auto blog
Jeep recalls 92k Grand Cherokee SUVs over electrical issue
Thu, 07 Nov 2013According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Chrysler is recalling 91,559 Jeep Grand Cherokee SUVs from the 2014 model year due to some serious electrical issues. All of the affected models were built between January 8 and August 20, 2013.
The NHTSA report states that, "Due to a disruption of computer communications and loose alternator ground wires, the affected vehicles may experience random illumination of multiple instrument cluster warning lights, loss of cluster illumination and loss of anti-lock brake system (ABS) and electronic stability control (ESC) function." The loss of ABS or ESC would greatly reduce a driver's ability to control the vehicle if things get squirrely, and since these failures would not be illuminated on the dashboard display, drivers would not be warned of the issue, increasing the risk of a crash.
The recall is expected to kick off sometime this month. Chrysler will notify affected Jeep owners and dealerships "will update the ABS and instrument cluster module software and tighten the alternator ground wire," according to NHTSA.
Weekly Recap For 5.20.16 | Autoblog Minute
Sat, May 21 2016Senior Editor Greg Migliore recaps the week in automotive news, including a look at the Aston Martin Vanquish Zagato, two Volvo concepts, and the FCA Jeep airbag recall.
Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating
Mon, Aug 6 2018Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.