Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2000 Jeep Cherokee Sport Xj, 4.0l, 4wd, 4 Door, 151k, Automatic, Snow Tires on 2040-cars

US $3,500.00
Year:2000 Mileage:150792
Location:

Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania, United States

Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania, United States
Advertising:

2000 Jeep Cherokee Sport XJ, 4.0L, 4WD, 4 Door, 151k, Automatic with snow tires + summer tires, PA Inspected thru 9/2014.
Runs good and has been reliable for me for the 2+ years I have owned it.  Body and frame seem solid, only very minor rust at the bottom of the doors (passes PA inspection).  4WD system works well.  It includes two complete sets of wheels and tires.  The summer tires/ steel wheels are OK and pass PA inspection.  The winter tires shown in the pictures are Firestone Winterforce and are almost like new (less than 2k miles) and are also mounted on their own steel rims.   I found that it is un-stopable in the snow with these tires even in 12+ inches of snow.  
The Good:
Engine / transmission / drive system is strong and has been reliable.  All the fluids were changed with in the last year (engine oil, brake fluid, transfer case, front and rear difs, and antifreeze).  
Has new Monroe Air shocks on the back along with a Class III hitch
Has a new muffler
Had a new radiator, water pump, hoses, Hello Fog lamps, and serpentine belt 2 years ago.
The Bad:
Check Engine light comes on for P155 code which is the after Cat oxygen sensor.  That sensor only verifies the cat is working for emissions, so the Jeep runs fine.  I drove it less than 5K miles a year, so it is emissions exempt.  
Some times I get a code for Cylinder #6 misfire but its seems to come and go and only effects it at idle (not a problem under load).  I put fuel injection cleaner thru it and it seemed to fix it.  
Slight rust at the bottom of the doors, but it does pass PA inspection.  
It had AC, but it is long gone.  The plumbing and condenser are missing.  The AC compressor is still there, but I don't know if it works.  
The Ugly:
The body is decent, but has scratches and dings from 150K miles and 13 years.  I don't think it has ever been wrecked.  
It has two added transmission coolers that I added to deal with towing a 3000 lb boat.  It works great but doesn't look the best mounted on front of the radiator.  
The interior is mostly OK, but the driver seat is wearing.  
Everything works electrically except the front speakers for the radio.  The back speakers are Kenwood and sound good.  

Local Pickup only, would prefer cash as the time of pick up.  



Auto Services in Pennsylvania

Yardy`s Auto Body ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 5410 Progress Blvd, Mc-Murray
Phone: (412) 854-5070

Xtreme Auto Collision ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Body Parts
Address: 9907 Bustleton Ave, Holland
Phone: (215) 676-2660

Warwick Auto Park ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers
Address: 700 Furnace Hills Pike, Willow-Street
Phone: (717) 625-3500

Walter`s General Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 195 N Spruce St, Watsontown
Phone: (570) 584-2257

Tire Consultants Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Tires-Wholesale & Manufacturers
Address: 560 N Reading Rd, Reamstown
Phone: (717) 733-0388

Tim`s Auto ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 379 Gravity Rd, Archbald
Phone: (570) 937-9248

Auto blog

2018 Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio vs. 2018 Jeep Grand Cherokee Trackhawk: On-paper sibling rivalry

Thu, Feb 15 2018

Pricing was revealed for the 2018 Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio, and with its $81,590 price tag, it's within range of yet another high-performance SUV from Fiat-Chrysler: the 2018 Jeep Grand Cherokee Trackhawk. The Hellcat-powered Jeep is more expensive than the Stelvio at $86,995, but depending on options, the price advantage might go either way. This left us wondering, how similar are these two high-powered SUVs? Besides sharing the same number of words in their very-long names, we took a look at some of their performance specs and put them in the spreadsheet below. As always, if you want to compare either of these with other speedy SUVs, be sure to try out our comparison tools. As far as outright speed, both SUVs are surprisingly close. The Trackhawk is just a bit quicker in a straight line, hitting 60 mph in just 3.5 seconds as opposed to the Alfa's 3.9. The Jeep's 180-mph top speed is also 3-mph quicker than the Alfa. But neither of these differences is especially huge. What makes this interesting is how different the paths each SUV takes to get to its results. The Trackhawk accomplishes the task with pure grunt. It has Dodge's Hellcat supercharged 6.2-liter V8 making 707 horsepower and 645 pound-feet of torque to overcome its hefty 5,363-pound body. The Alfa, on the other hand, makes do with less power and torque, 505 and 443, respectively, from its twin-turbocharged 2.9-liter V6. It has less weight, though. Exactly how much less we're not sure, since Alfa hasn't revealed that number, but a regular Stelvio weighs right around 4,000 pounds, so we would guess the weight is similar, possibly a little more. View 14 Photos The differences in how each SUV achieves its performance should result in pretty different driving characteristics, and probably different buyers. Each SUV's bragging points also indicates this. The Trackhawk boasts an impressive 11.6-second claimed quarter-mile time, something that American muscle car fans everywhere care about. The Alfa brags about how it's the fastest production SUV to lap the Nurburgring, something sure to impress fans of foreign cars and those that value handling over straight-line performance. So really, although these two SUVs have performance similarities, they're also very different, and the right one for you depends on what you value. View 29 Photos Also, as an afterthought, we wonder if the guys that attempted a Viper record at the 'Ring would be up for trying to break the Alfa time with the Jeep.

Detroit Three automakers and UAW will continue to require masks

Thu, Jun 10 2021

GM CEO Mary Barra at a Warren, Mich., training center in September. (Reuters)   WASHINGTON — Detroit's Big Three automakers and the United Auto Workers (UAW) union said on Wednesday that workers will continue to be required to wear masks in workplaces. The joint statement from the UAW and General Motors, Ford and Chrysler-parent Stellantis NV said it was continuing the requirements "out of an abundance of caution." The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said in May that fully vaccinated people do not need to wear masks in most instances, including at work. The UAW and the automakers said temperature screening upon entering facilities is expected to be phased out. The UAW and automakers continue to recommend autoworkers get vaccinated. Many U.S. employers are still requiring vaccinated workers to wear masks in workplaces. Volkswagen AG's U.S. unit said it will "no longer require masks for fully vaccinated employees after June 21, and will continue to follow CDC guidelines." Toyota is among the automakers that has ended temperature checks and entry questionnaires at U.S. plants but it is continuing to require facial coverings. Honda and Nissan said they had made no changes to their U.S. employee COVID-19 requirements.   Plants/Manufacturing Chrysler Dodge Ford GM Jeep RAM Safety coronavirus

Jeep Wrangler to remain in Toledo, get a pickup version

Tue, Sep 1 2015

Production of the Jeep Wrangler is staying in Toledo, OH, and it might be getting a pickup in the near future, according to Automotive News. Meanwhile, Cherokee production is leaving Ohio. The announcement was reportedly made to plant management earlier today. "We found a solution that accommodates a variety of other interests to us because of the way in which we can move some product around," CEO Sergio Marchionne said to Automotive News. A Jeep spokesman declined to comment to Autoblog. Right now the official details about FCA's production plans are still hazy. However, an official announcement is expected when the automaker has a deal with the UAW, which could be by Sept. 14. According to insiders speaking to AN, the Wrangler pickup would join the lineup in 2017 or 2018. While losing the Cherokee doesn't help the Toledo factory, the new pickup should take up some of the slack. It also keeps Wrangler production going in Ohio until the next-generation model launches in 2018. The Cherokee is expected to move to the Sterling Heights Assembly plant in Michigan or Belvidere Assembly in Illinois because they build vehicles on the same platform, AN reports. The future of Wrangler production has been a hot topic at the Toledo plant for the entire year. There was initial speculation that model might leave the factory if it moved to an aluminum body. However, the latest reports offered some hope of the Jeep remaining there. Last week, Autoblog's sources at FCA also said that the Wrangler pickup was coming but couldn't confirm a timeframe. Related Video: