1999 Jeep Cherokee Sport on 2040-cars
9466 N Karen Dr, Mooresville, Indiana, United States
Engine:4.0L I6 12V MPFI OHV
Transmission:4-Speed Automatic
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1J4FF68S2XL546481
Stock Num: 14C031
Make: Jeep
Model: Cherokee Sport
Year: 1999
Exterior Color: Blue
Interior Color: Gray
Options: Drive Type: 4WD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 231000
$65 A WEEK--$1500 DOWN PLUS TAX-WAC-CALL ABOUT A CASH DISCOUNT-FILL OUT A CREDIT APP. ON OUR WEBSITE 888-583-0165) OVER 25 YEARS OF SERVICE...FOR MORE INFO ON THIS VEHICLE AND OVER 200 MORE, VISIT US AT VALLEY-MOTORS.COM OR LIKE US ON FACEBOOK. OVER 200 VEHICLES IN STOCK NOW TO CHOOSE FROM. BUY HERE PAY HERE AVAILABLE ON MOST VEHICLES, OR CALL ABOUT OUR CASH DISCOUNT. SERVING OUR COMMUNITY SINCE 1985. WWW.VALLEY-MOTORS.COM
Jeep Cherokee for Sale
1998 jeep cherokee sport(US $4,495.00)
2014 jeep cherokee limited(US $36,595.00)
2014 jeep cherokee latitude(US $31,470.00)
2014 jeep cherokee latitude(US $32,465.00)
2014 jeep cherokee limited(US $32,675.00)
2014 jeep cherokee sport(US $24,380.00)
Auto Services in Indiana
Williams Auto Parts Inc ★★★★★
Williams Auto Parts Inc ★★★★★
Webb Hyundai ★★★★★
Trusty & Sons Tire Co ★★★★★
Tom Roush Lincoln Mazda ★★★★★
Tire Barn Warehouse ★★★★★
Auto blog
Lexus tops JD Power Vehicle Dependability Study again, Buick bests Toyota
Wed, Feb 25 2015It shouldn't surprise anyone, but Lexus has once again taken the top spot in JD Power's Vehicle Dependability Study. That'd be the Japanese luxury brand's fourth straight year at the top of table. The big news, though, is the rise of Buick. General Motor's near-premium brand beat out Toyota to take second place, with 110 problems per 100 vehicles compared to Toyota's 111 problems. Lexus owners only reported 89 problems per 100 vehicles. Besides Buick's three-position jump, Scion enjoyed a major improvement, jumping 13 positions from 2014. Ram and Mitsubishi made big gains, as well, moving up 11 and 10 positions, respectively. In terms of individual segments, GM and Toyota both excelled, taking home seven segment awards each. The study wasn't good news for all involved, though. A number of popular automakers finished below the industry average of 147 problems per 100 vehicles, including Subaru, (157PP100), Volkswagen (165PP100), Ford/Hyundai (188PP100 each) and Mini (193PP100). The biggest losers (by a tremendous margin, we might add) were Land Rover and Fiat, recording 258 and 273 problems per 100 vehicles. The next closest brand was Jeep, with 197PP100. While the Vehicle Dependability Study uses the same measurement system as the Initial Quality Survey, the two metrics analyze very different things. The VDS looks at problems experienced by original owners of model year 2012 vehicles over the past 12 months, while the oft-quoted IQS focuses on problems in the first 90 days of new-vehicle ownership. Like the IQS, though, the VDS has a rather broad definition of what a problem is. Because of that, a low score from JD Power is no guarantee of extreme unreliability, so much as just poor design. In this most recent study, the two most reported problems focused on Bluetooth connectivity and the voice-command systems. The former leaves plenty of room for user error due to poor design (particularly true of the Bluetooth systems on the low-scoring Fords, Volkswagens and Subarus), while the second is something JD Power has already confirmed as being universally terrible. That makes means that while these studies are important, they shouldn't be taken as gospel when it comes to automotive reliability. News Source: JD PowerImage Credit: Copyright 2015 Jeremy Korzeniewski / AOL Buick Fiat Ford GM Hyundai Jeep Land Rover Lexus MINI Mitsubishi RAM Scion Subaru Toyota Volkswagen Auto Repair Ownership study
NHTSA still mulling crash tests for recalled Jeeps
Thu, 15 Aug 2013Well, no one should ever accuse the government of not giving things plenty of thought. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is still debating whether it will retest any of the 1.56 million 1992 to 1998 Grand Cherokees and 2002 to 2007 Libertys that were part of a recall regarding fires after rear-end collisions. And yes, this debate has been going on for over a month. In other news...
The recall dustup started in early June, when Chrysler took the unusual position of refusing a recall request from NHTSA regarding placement of the fuel tank on the effected vehicles. NHTSA said a collision could cause a fire, a position Chrysler took issue with. Extensive negotiations ensued, with Chrysler agreeing to fit certain Jeeps with trailer hitches, which it said would provide some protection to fuel tanks mounted behind the rear axle in the event of a collision.
Part of the issue rests with the amount of data that needs to be processed, according to The Detroit News. NHTSA administrator David Strickland said during a Washington Auto Press Association meeting, "There's a lot of data and Chrysler is being very cooperative in giving us more data." Until that information has been sorted, it looks like re-testing will still be up for debate.
Jeepster name may be used for Fiat-based baby Jeep
Tue, 17 Dec 2013In 1948, Willys-Overland, the forbearers of Jeep, built a vehicle called the Jeepster. It was a funky little thing, designed as a mix of the more rugged Jeeps that came before with what was then a modern car, which arguably makes it the world's first crossover. The name was later revived from 1966 to 1972, which means for Jeep enthusiasts, it has some history.
Now, the modern Jeep brand may revive the Jeepster name for a new product, likely based on Fiat bones, that will slot in at the bottom of the brand's range underneath the soon-to-depart Compass and Patriot. The report comes from Australia's Drive, which cites a dealer source that has seen the vehicle.
That same dealer confirmed there is a link between the Jeepster and the rumored Fiat 500X, and that the former will be available in both front and all-wheel-drive variants. The source also claims both gas and diesel engines will be available, although as this is an Aussie site, we shouldn't take that to mean we'll get a diesel Jeepster in the US.