1985 Cj 7 Original Body****no Body Work. Original 48k Miles Chevy V8 on 2040-cars
Leo, Indiana, United States
85 CJ 7 with original miles around 48,200. I drive it daily. It came from out west clearly used very little. It was an original 4cyl and now has a 83 Chevy V8 305 engine. It had been gone over, and built back to stock specs. It has a t176 transmission that is a heavy duty and it has been gone threw as well($975). Original was a t4 that was very weak. Has a original Dana transfer case & axels. I scrapped and painted the underside anf sprayed it with truck bed liner. It did NOT require much work since it is rock solid to start with and not rusty. The interior floor needs finished with lightly sanded and finished. The seats have covers on them and still are very usable but they need recovered to be perfect. It has a complete soft top and soft doors and a bikini top.
I drive this thing daily and so does my son. I trust it 100% not to ever leave me stranded. It's a lot of fun! Tire are in great shape. All terrains 33X12.5 on 15 inch rims 4 inch suspension lift kit Dual exhaust with glass packs sounds good. Heavy duty front bumper These things are all over on price with them up to 20k restored. PLease understand this CJ is in very good condition and the floor, frame & body is in better condition than most newer YJ and TJ's. No body work, frame or floor work As you can see in the pic of the red floor pan on the underside before i put liner on it for protection. I like to use it as a jeep! This is not a perfect Jeep or the price would 3 X higher. If you want new buy new. Text, call or email questions or if you need more pics. Two60-two41-5301 |
Jeep CJ for Sale
1982 jeep cj-8 scrambler, restored, 304 v8,tons of $$ spent,fire sale no reserve
1977 custm built cj scrambler(US $25,000.00)
84 cj7 project package - '86 jeep tub - new painles wire harness(US $2,800.00)
1980 jeep wrangler cj7 automatic 304 v8 lifted off road beast!!!
1981 jeep cj5
1968 willys cj5 jeep(US $3,000.00)
Auto Services in Indiana
West Side Auto Collision ★★★★★
V R Auto Repairs ★★★★★
Tri State Battery Supply ★★★★★
Tony Kinser Body Shop ★★★★★
Stanfa Tire & Auto ★★★★★
Speed Shop Motorsports ★★★★★
Auto blog
Four Wheeler crowns Ultimate Factory 4x4... who wins?
Thu, 15 Nov 2012Nearly every automaker doing business in the SUV or pickup truck segments offers a package designed to improve the off-road capabilities of its wares. But, of course, not all such factory kits are created equal. How, then, to separate the wheat from the chaff? Gather each of them up and put them through their paces, naturally.
The folks from Four Wheeler and PickupTrucks.com joined forces to run just such a comparison test, with the winner named the Ultimate Factory 4x4. A total of seven vehicles showed up to the fight: the 2012 Ford F-150 SVT Raptor, 2013 Jeep Wrangler Rubicon, 2012 Nissan Frontier PRO-4X and Xterra PRO-4X, 2012 Ram Power Wagon, and 2012 Toyota 4Runner Trail and Tacoma TRD T|X Baja Series.
With the contestants in place, the whole crew put each vehicle through a battery of tests that included skidpad and acceleration measurements, a hillclimb, a rocky stairstep course and a rock garden. Considering the nature of the beasts, on-road ride and comfort were not part of the routine.
FCA delays Grand Wagoneer and next-generation heavy-duty Ram trucks
Mon, Dec 12 2016The upcoming Jeep Grand Wagoneer has had a tumultuous gestation thus far. At one point it was essentially confirmed, but later it was rumored to have been cancelled. In that context, the latest report from Automotive News is something of a mixed blessing. According to the publication, the Grand Wagoneer has simply been delayed, as has the next-generation Ram heavy duty truck line. This does not seem to affect the fully redesigned Ram 1500, which was previously reported to have been pushed back slightly to 2019. Automotive News says the information came from unnamed sources at the company. Nothing was said about how long the vehicles would be delayed. The publication also conjectures that FCA is delaying the models to save some money to help cover the company's $7 billion of debt , since re-tooling both the heavy-duty truck plant and eventual Grand Wagoneer plant will be expensive. View 6 Photos We reached out to Chrysler for more information on the subject, but the company wouldn't comment on the report. Even so, we wouldn't be too surprised if FCA is indeed delaying these products. The company has delayed a number of vehicles in recent years. In fact nearly every major FCA truck and SUV, including the Grand Wagoneer and Ram line, were delayed about a year and a half ago. We certainly hope the company doesn't delay the Grand Wagoneer for too long, since it's possible it will have a price tag of over $130,000. The profit margins on an SUV with that kind of MSRP would go a long way to helping to pay down the company's debt. Related Video:
NHTSA still mulling crash tests for recalled Jeeps
Thu, 15 Aug 2013Well, no one should ever accuse the government of not giving things plenty of thought. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is still debating whether it will retest any of the 1.56 million 1992 to 1998 Grand Cherokees and 2002 to 2007 Libertys that were part of a recall regarding fires after rear-end collisions. And yes, this debate has been going on for over a month. In other news...
The recall dustup started in early June, when Chrysler took the unusual position of refusing a recall request from NHTSA regarding placement of the fuel tank on the effected vehicles. NHTSA said a collision could cause a fire, a position Chrysler took issue with. Extensive negotiations ensued, with Chrysler agreeing to fit certain Jeeps with trailer hitches, which it said would provide some protection to fuel tanks mounted behind the rear axle in the event of a collision.
Part of the issue rests with the amount of data that needs to be processed, according to The Detroit News. NHTSA administrator David Strickland said during a Washington Auto Press Association meeting, "There's a lot of data and Chrysler is being very cooperative in giving us more data." Until that information has been sorted, it looks like re-testing will still be up for debate.