2010 Hyundai Sonata Gl Sedan 4-door 2.4l on 2040-cars
Fayette, New York, United States
Body Type:Sedan
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:2.4L 2359CC l4 GAS DOHC Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Private Seller
Make: Hyundai
Model: Sonata
Trim: Sedan 4-Door
Options: CD Player
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag, Side Airbags
Drive Type: FWD
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows
Mileage: 47,300
Exterior Color: Red
Interior Color: Tan
Warranty: Vehicle has an existing warranty
Number of Cylinders: 4
Hi, my name is Joe and My Sonata is in very good condition and has been excellently maintained. Purchased new in NJ, I have moved to the Finger Lakes region of NY where it has been hardly driven as I share another Hyundai with my wife. We are selling the Sonata because we live close by our business and no longer need two vehicles. The car has some minor interior stains on the rear seats. Otherwise, it's pretty clean; it has not been used much. It is currently located in Fayette NY 13065 if you would like to plan a visit to buy it. Thank you for your interest.
In a March 2012 comparison test by Car and Driver, the Sonata came in fourth place out of six cars behind the first place Volkswagen Passat, second place Honda Accord, and third place Kia Optima.
Safety
Top Safety Pick Award in Insurance Institute for Highway Safety tests
- Frontal impact crash test: "Good"
- Side impact crash test: "Good"
- Rear crash protection: "Good"
- Roof strength evaluation: "Good"
Later release (manufactured on or after July 2, 2010) version of Model Year 2011: by the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) under 2010 new test rules.
The 2011 Sonata is one of six vehicles rated Five Star under new rules as of November 2010.
- Overall Frontal Rating:
- Frontal Rating (Driver):
- Frontal Rating (Passenger):
- Side Overall Rating (Front):
- Side Overall Rating (Rear):
- Side Barrier Rating (Front):
- Side Barrier Rating (Rear):
- Side Pole Rating (Driver):
- Rollover:
Early release (manufactured before July 2, 2010) version of model year 2011:
- Overall Frontal Rating:
- Frontal Rating (Driver):
- Frontal Rating (Passenger):
- Side Overall Rating (Front):
- Side Overall Rating (Rear):
- Side Barrier Rating (Front):
- Side Barrier Rating (Rear):
- Side Pole Rating (Driver):
- Rollover:
Australasian NCAP - The Hyundai Sonata scored the highest possible rating of 5 stars
Korean NCAP - The Hyundai Sonata scored the highest possible ratings across the frontal, offset and side crash tests
China NCAP - The Hyundai Sonata scored the highest possible rating of 6 stars
Hyundai Sonata for Sale
- 12 sonata se turbo 1 owner clean car fax certified 100k(US $17,444.00)
- 2011 sonata se turbo leather heated mirrors aux input bluetooth satellite radio
- 2012 hyundai sonata all power, very nice car!! no reserve!!!!
- 2011 hyundai sonata navigation back up camera leather(US $15,921.00)
- 2008 sonata limited only 44,000 miles(US $10,700.00)
- 2007 hyundai sonata se sedan 4-door 3.3l(US $6,500.00)
Auto Services in New York
Witchcraft Body & Paint ★★★★★
Will`s Wheels ★★★★★
West Herr Chevrolet Of Williamsville ★★★★★
Wayne`s Radiator ★★★★★
Valley Cadillac Corp ★★★★★
Tydings Automotive Svc Station ★★★★★
Auto blog
IIHS gives 90 models its Top Safety Pick award in one fell swoop
Wed, Feb 24 2021Although the Audi A7 and the Toyota Sienna are positioned on completely different ends of the automotive spectrum, they overlap in one important area: both earned a Top Safety Pick+ award from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS). They're among the 49 cars that received the distinction for 2021, while 41 additional models scored a Top Safety Pick (without the plus) award from the institute, bringing the number of winners to 90. Earning a coveted Top Safety Pick award from the IIHS is easier said than done. Recipients need to score a good rating in the institute's six crash tests, be available with a front crash prevention system that scores a superior or advanced rating in vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-pedestrian evaluations, and be offered with (but, crucially, not necessarily fitted standard with) headlights that are either good or acceptable. Vehicles that have good or acceptable headlights across the full range, regardless of trim level, are eligible for the Top Safety Pick+ award. The Hyundai Group (which includes Hyundai, Kia, and Genesis) earned more awards than any other carmaker, with 12 standard Top Safety Pick distinctions and five earning a Pick+. Volvo led the Pick+ chart with its entire lineup of nine vehicles. At the other end of the spectrum, Mitsubishi still hasn't earned a single award, and General Motors only nabbed one of each. Safety is spreading across market segments, according to the IIHS. It pointed out that, in 2020, there were no minivans or pickup trucks on the list of Top Safety Pick recipients. Fast forward to 2021, and the list includes the Honda Odyssey, the Toyota Sienna, and the Ram 1500 crew cab; the first two earned a Pick+. The full list of 2021 award winners is on the IIHS website. Note that, for some models, only units built after a certain date earned an award. This distinction reflects a change (usually in headlights) during the production run. Cars sold in the United States are safer than ever, but automakers still sell vehicles with a zero-star crash test rating in many global markets. Suzuki's 2020 S-Presso flunked a reasonably basic round of tests in 2020. Featured Gallery 2021 Hyundai Palisade View 12 Photos Audi Hyundai Volvo
2013 Hyundai Santa Fe probed by NHTSA over axle failure
Wed, 10 Jul 2013According to Reuters, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has launched a preliminary evaluation of the 2013 Hyundai Santa Fe after receiving two complaints of broken front axles on vehicles with fewer than 5,000 miles on their odometers. Naturally, a broken axle could result in the loss of control of the vehicle, especially if it occurs at high speed. It's not immediately clear if the investigation centers on the five-seat Sport, the seven-seat model or both.
No actual recall has yet been issued, and "no safety defect has been identified," according to a statement Hyundai released to Reuters, which added, "Hyundai will, of course, take any actions necessary to ensure the safety of our customers if the information gathered during the investigation indicates that action is appropriate."
We suppose you could sum up the report this way: 2013 Santa Fe owners, stay tuned.
Lexus tops JD Power Vehicle Dependability Study again, Buick bests Toyota
Wed, Feb 25 2015It shouldn't surprise anyone, but Lexus has once again taken the top spot in JD Power's Vehicle Dependability Study. That'd be the Japanese luxury brand's fourth straight year at the top of table. The big news, though, is the rise of Buick. General Motor's near-premium brand beat out Toyota to take second place, with 110 problems per 100 vehicles compared to Toyota's 111 problems. Lexus owners only reported 89 problems per 100 vehicles. Besides Buick's three-position jump, Scion enjoyed a major improvement, jumping 13 positions from 2014. Ram and Mitsubishi made big gains, as well, moving up 11 and 10 positions, respectively. In terms of individual segments, GM and Toyota both excelled, taking home seven segment awards each. The study wasn't good news for all involved, though. A number of popular automakers finished below the industry average of 147 problems per 100 vehicles, including Subaru, (157PP100), Volkswagen (165PP100), Ford/Hyundai (188PP100 each) and Mini (193PP100). The biggest losers (by a tremendous margin, we might add) were Land Rover and Fiat, recording 258 and 273 problems per 100 vehicles. The next closest brand was Jeep, with 197PP100. While the Vehicle Dependability Study uses the same measurement system as the Initial Quality Survey, the two metrics analyze very different things. The VDS looks at problems experienced by original owners of model year 2012 vehicles over the past 12 months, while the oft-quoted IQS focuses on problems in the first 90 days of new-vehicle ownership. Like the IQS, though, the VDS has a rather broad definition of what a problem is. Because of that, a low score from JD Power is no guarantee of extreme unreliability, so much as just poor design. In this most recent study, the two most reported problems focused on Bluetooth connectivity and the voice-command systems. The former leaves plenty of room for user error due to poor design (particularly true of the Bluetooth systems on the low-scoring Fords, Volkswagens and Subarus), while the second is something JD Power has already confirmed as being universally terrible. That makes means that while these studies are important, they shouldn't be taken as gospel when it comes to automotive reliability. News Source: JD PowerImage Credit: Copyright 2015 Jeremy Korzeniewski / AOL Buick Fiat Ford GM Hyundai Jeep Land Rover Lexus MINI Mitsubishi RAM Scion Subaru Toyota Volkswagen Auto Repair Ownership study