2014 Hyundai Elantra on 2040-cars
649 Dunn Rd, Hazelwood, Missouri, United States
Engine:2.0L I4 16V GDI DOHC
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): KMHDH6AH9EU028201
Stock Num: 7305
Make: Hyundai
Model: Elantra
Year: 2014
Exterior Color: Titanium Gray Metallic
Interior Color: Gray
Options: Drive Type: FWD
Number of Doors: 2 Doors
Mileage: 15
All the right ingredients! Come to the experts! If you want an amazing deal on an amazing car that will keep you smiling all day, then take a look at this fun 2014 Hyundai Elantra. Climb into this superb Hyundai Elantra, knowing that it will always get you where you need to go, on time, every time. Experience the Mungenast Difference! Visit us at mungenasthyundai.com. Mungenast Hyundai in Hazelwood just off of North Lindbergh and I-270 at 649 Dunn Rd, Hazelwood, MO 63042 888-212-1161 St Louis's Low-Priced Volume Hyundai Dealer! Remember, Hyundai makes the car, Mungenast makes the difference!Prices do not include additional fees and costs of closing, including government fees and taxes, any finance charges, any dealer fees, any emissions testing fees or other fees. All prices, specifications and availability subject to change without notice. Contact dealer for most current information. Advertised price includes all available factory and dealership rebates and discounts. See Mungenast Hyundai for complete details. This offer includes all rebates and dealer cash back to the dealer. Includes the $2000 HMF Bonus cash so this offer in not available with 0% financing. Includes Valued Owner Rebate of $500 and Military Rebate of $500. See a Mungenast Sales Associate for complete details and requirements for rebates. All Dealer Installed Accessories are extra. Come Experience the Mungenast Difference at Mungenast Hyundai. St Louis' Low Price Volume Hyundai Dealership. View the new prices at MungenastHyundai.com At 270 and N. Lindberg on Dunn Rd in Hazelwood, MO. Remember Hyundai Makes the Car, Mungenast Makes the Difference! 888-212-1161
Hyundai Elantra for Sale
- 2014 hyundai elantra limited(US $22,420.00)
- 2014 hyundai elantra limited(US $22,519.00)
- 2014 hyundai elantra limited(US $22,434.00)
- 2014 hyundai elantra limited(US $22,488.00)
- 2014 hyundai elantra limited(US $22,525.00)
- 2014 hyundai elantra limited(US $22,549.00)
Auto Services in Missouri
Yocum Automotive ★★★★★
Wright Automotive ★★★★★
Winchester Cleaners ★★★★★
Taylor`s Auto Salvage ★★★★★
STS Car Care & Towing ★★★★★
Stepney`s Towing ★★★★★
Auto blog
Which electric cars can charge at a Tesla Supercharger?
Sun, Jul 9 2023The difference between Tesla charging and non-Tesla charging. Electrify America; Tesla Tesla's advantage has long been its charging technology and Supercharger network. Now, more and more automakers are switching to Tesla's charging tech. But there are a few things non-Tesla drivers need to know about charging at a Tesla station. A lot has hit the news cycle in recent months with regard to electric car drivers and where they can and can't plug in. The key factor in all of that? Whether automakers switched to Tesla's charging standard. More car companies are shifting to Tesla's charging tech in the hopes of boosting their customers' confidence in going electric. Here's what it boils down to: If you currently drive a Tesla, you can keep charging at Tesla charging locations, which use the company's North American Charging Standard (NACS), which has long served it well. The chargers are thinner, more lightweight and easier to wrangle than other brands. If you currently drive a non-Tesla EV, you have to charge at a non-Tesla charging station like that of Electrify America or EVgo — which use the Combined Charging System (CCS) — unless you stumble upon a Tesla charger already equipped with the Magic Dock adapter. For years, CCS tech dominated EVs from everyone but Tesla. Starting next year, if you drive a non-Tesla EV (from the automakers that have announced they'll make the switch), you'll be able to charge at all Supercharger locations with an adapter. And by 2025, EVs from some automakers won't even need an adaptor. Here's how to charge up, depending on which EV you have: Ford 2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E. Tim Levin/Insider Ford was the earliest traditional automaker to team up with Tesla for its charging tech. Current Ford EV owners — those driving a Ford electric vehicle already fitted with a CCS port — will be able to use a Tesla-developed adapter to access Tesla Superchargers starting in the spring. That means that, if you own a Mustang Mach-E or Ford F-150 Lightning, you will need the adapter in order to use a Tesla station come 2024. But Ford will equip its future EVs with the NACS port starting in 2025 — eliminating the need for any adapter. Owners of new Ford EVs will be able to pull into a Supercharger station and juice up, no problem. General Motors Cadillac Lyriq. Cadillac GM will also allow its EV drivers to plug into Tesla stations.
Lexus tops JD Power Vehicle Dependability Study again, Buick bests Toyota
Wed, Feb 25 2015It shouldn't surprise anyone, but Lexus has once again taken the top spot in JD Power's Vehicle Dependability Study. That'd be the Japanese luxury brand's fourth straight year at the top of table. The big news, though, is the rise of Buick. General Motor's near-premium brand beat out Toyota to take second place, with 110 problems per 100 vehicles compared to Toyota's 111 problems. Lexus owners only reported 89 problems per 100 vehicles. Besides Buick's three-position jump, Scion enjoyed a major improvement, jumping 13 positions from 2014. Ram and Mitsubishi made big gains, as well, moving up 11 and 10 positions, respectively. In terms of individual segments, GM and Toyota both excelled, taking home seven segment awards each. The study wasn't good news for all involved, though. A number of popular automakers finished below the industry average of 147 problems per 100 vehicles, including Subaru, (157PP100), Volkswagen (165PP100), Ford/Hyundai (188PP100 each) and Mini (193PP100). The biggest losers (by a tremendous margin, we might add) were Land Rover and Fiat, recording 258 and 273 problems per 100 vehicles. The next closest brand was Jeep, with 197PP100. While the Vehicle Dependability Study uses the same measurement system as the Initial Quality Survey, the two metrics analyze very different things. The VDS looks at problems experienced by original owners of model year 2012 vehicles over the past 12 months, while the oft-quoted IQS focuses on problems in the first 90 days of new-vehicle ownership. Like the IQS, though, the VDS has a rather broad definition of what a problem is. Because of that, a low score from JD Power is no guarantee of extreme unreliability, so much as just poor design. In this most recent study, the two most reported problems focused on Bluetooth connectivity and the voice-command systems. The former leaves plenty of room for user error due to poor design (particularly true of the Bluetooth systems on the low-scoring Fords, Volkswagens and Subarus), while the second is something JD Power has already confirmed as being universally terrible. That makes means that while these studies are important, they shouldn't be taken as gospel when it comes to automotive reliability. News Source: JD PowerImage Credit: Copyright 2015 Jeremy Korzeniewski / AOL Buick Fiat Ford GM Hyundai Jeep Land Rover Lexus MINI Mitsubishi RAM Scion Subaru Toyota Volkswagen Auto Repair Ownership study
Toyota tops Consumer Reports best, worst used car values
Tue, 18 Mar 2014We often mock Toyota for building boring, soulless cars, but a new study by Consumer Reports suggests that regardless of whether that's true, the company has some of the best used cars on the market. In its report on used cars from 2004-2013, the Japanese automaker had 11 vehicles among its brands on the list - more than any other automaker.
CR breaks the list down by cost and vehicle size, and Toyota has at least one entry at every price point and in nearly every segment. To score a recommendation, a vehicle had to perform well in the magazine's initial tests and score above-average reliability results. It also tried to only suggest cars with electronic stability control. Of the 28 recommended vehicles, Honda/Acura had the second most mentions at six, and Ford, Hyundai and Subaru managed two each.
The Detroit brands also made it to the list, but not in a positive way. Consumer Reports compiled a list of 22 vehicles it wouldn't recommend because "they have multiple years of much-worse-than-average overall reliability." General Motors had the most unrecommended models on the list at six, but Chrysler and Ford weren't far behind, with five cars each from their brands not making the grade. The full list of recommendations is available on CR's website.