2014 Hyundai Sonata Gls on 2040-cars
649 Dunn Rd, Hazelwood, Missouri, United States
Engine:2.4L I4 16V GDI DOHC
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 5NPEB4AC3EH934860
Stock Num: 7326
Make: Hyundai
Model: Sonata GLS
Year: 2014
Exterior Color: Venetian Red Metallic
Interior Color: Gray
Options: Drive Type: FWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 15
Gry Premium Cloth. Suitable switchgear. Fun to drive. If you want an amazing deal on an amazing car that will keep you smiling all day, then take a look at this fun 2014 Hyundai Sonata. Rack up savings on this priced-to-move Sonata. So clean, it looks like it just rolled off the showroom floor. Experience the Mungenast Difference! Visit us at mungenasthyundai.com. Mungenast Hyundai in Hazelwood just off of North Lindbergh and I-270 at 649 Dunn Rd, Hazelwood, MO 63042 888-212-1161 St Louis's Low-Priced Volume Hyundai Dealer! Remember, Hyundai makes the car, Mungenast makes the difference!Prices do not include additional fees and costs of closing, including government fees and taxes, any finance charges, any dealer fees, any emissions testing fees or other fees. All prices, specifications and availability subject to change without notice. Contact dealer for most current information. Advertised price includes all available factory and dealership rebates and discounts. See Mungenast Hyundai for complete details. This offer includes all rebates and dealer cash back to the dealer. Includes the $2000 HMF Bonus cash so this offer in not available with 0% financing. Includes Valued Owner Rebate of $500 and Military Rebate of $500. See a Mungenast Sales Associate for complete details and requirements for rebates. All Dealer Installed Accessories are extra. Come Experience the Mungenast Difference at Mungenast Hyundai. St Louis' Low Price Volume Hyundai Dealership. View the new prices at MungenastHyundai.com At 270 and N. Lindberg on Dunn Rd in Hazelwood, MO. Remember Hyundai Makes the Car, Mungenast Makes the Difference! 888-212-1161
Hyundai Sonata for Sale
2014 hyundai sonata gls(US $19,016.00)
2014 hyundai sonata gls(US $19,016.00)
2014 hyundai sonata gls(US $19,016.00)
2014 hyundai sonata gls(US $19,016.00)
2014 hyundai sonata gls(US $19,016.00)
2014 hyundai sonata gls(US $19,157.00)
Auto Services in Missouri
Wodohodsky Auto Body ★★★★★
West County Nissan ★★★★★
Wayne`s Auto Body ★★★★★
Superior Collision Repair ★★★★★
Superior Auto Service ★★★★★
Springfield Transmission Inc ★★★★★
Auto blog
Which car companies are creating new jobs in America?
Fri, Sep 22 2017Since January, automakers have announced investments totaling $9.5 billion in U.S. plants, creating or retaining more than 12,000 jobs. Some of those companies have yet to announce just how many jobs will be created given their investments, with the location of many of those jobs still to be determined. Specifically, the 4,000-job Toyota-Mazda joint venture plant still hasn't announced its location, with numerous states jockeying for it. Hyundai has plans to invest $1 billion but has not announced a jobs number yet. And likewise Ford is investing $1.2 billion in Michigan without specifying a number of jobs. Volvo this week announced plans to add a second line to its factory under construction in South Carolina, spending another $500 million and adding 2,500 jobs to the 2,000 it was already trying to fill. Then Thursday, Daimler announced a $1 billion expansion to its facility in Tuscaloosa, Ala., to produce EV batteries and electric SUVs, a move that will add 600 jobs to its hiring this year. Above, we've created a handy pie chart showing you which companies have announced new jobs and how many there will be. Reporting by Paul Lienert in Detroit News Source: Reuters Plants/Manufacturing BMW Chrysler Ford GM Honda Hyundai Mazda Mercedes-Benz Toyota Volvo jobs
2016: The year of the autonomous-car promise
Mon, Jan 2 2017About half of the news we covered this year related in some way to The Great Autonomous Future, or at least it seemed that way. If you listen to automakers, by 2020 everyone will be driving (riding?) around in self-driving cars. But what will they look like, how will we make the transition from driven to driverless, and how will laws and infrastructure adapt? We got very few answers to those questions, and instead were handed big promises, vague timelines, and a dose of misdirection by automakers. There has been a lot of talk, but we still don't know that much about these proposed vehicles, which are at least three years off. That's half a development cycle in this industry. We generally only start to get an idea of what a company will build about two years before it goes on sale. So instead of concrete information about autonomous cars, 2016 has brought us a lot of promises, many in the form of concept cars. They have popped up from just about every automaker accompanied by the CEO's pledge to deliver a Level 4 autonomous, all-electric model (usually a crossover) in a few years. It's very easy to say that a static design study sitting on a stage will be able to drive itself while projecting a movie on the windshield, but it's another thing entirely to make good on that promise. With a few exceptions, 2016 has been stuck in the promising stage. It's a strange thing, really; automakers are famous for responding with "we don't discuss future product" whenever we ask about models or variants known to be in the pipeline, yet when it comes to self-driving electric wondermobiles, companies have been falling all over themselves to let us know that theirs is coming soon, it'll be oh so great, and, hey, that makes them a mobility company now, not just an automaker. A lot of this is posturing and marketing, showing the public, shareholders, and the rest of the industry that "we're making one, too, we swear!" It has set off a domino effect – once a few companies make the guarantee, the rest feel forced to throw out a grandiose yet vague plan for an unknown future. And indeed there are usually scant details to go along with such announcements – an imprecise mileage estimate here, or a far-off, percentage-based goal there. Instead of useful discussion of future product, we get demonstrations of test mules, announcements of big R&D budgets and new test centers they'll fund, those futuristic concept cars, and, yeah, more promises.
Hyundai To Fight $248 Million Judgment Over Fatal Montana Crash
Fri, May 16 2014A Montana jury has levied a $248 million ruling against Hyundai in the case of a crash that killed two occupants in July 2011. The automaker plans to appeal the ruling. Cousins Trevor and Tanner Olson were driving a 2005 Hyundai Tiburon when they hit another vehicle head-on. According to lawyers representing their family, the steering knuckle on the car cracked and this allegedly caused it to lose control. Hyundai claimed that fireworks had been let off inside the vehicle, which caused the driver to swerve. The company alleges that evidence that could have proved its innocence was barred from the case. The jury found in favor of the family and awarded them about $8 million in damages after a two-week trial. It claimed that Hyundai had shown "actual malice," according to Reuters. The jurors also slammed Hyundai with a further $240 million in punitive damages. Hyundai told Reuters that it plans to appeal immediately and called the verdict "outrageous." Autoblog has received a copy of the automaker's official statement, detailing its plans to appeal this case. Scroll down to read it. Statement by Hyundai Motor America While a tragic accident, Hyundai firmly believes the jury's verdict in Olson vs. Hyundai is mistaken and award of damages at three times what was sought by the plaintiffs is outrageous and should be overturned as Hyundai is not at fault. Eyewitness testimony established – and experts for both sides agree – that fireworks exploded in the unbelted teenagers' vehicle immediately before the July 2, 2011 accident, which involved the driver losing control, crossing the median and crashing head-on into an oncoming Pontiac at a closing speed of approximately 140 miles per hour – a speed confirmed by experts for both sides. Hyundai believes the jury's view of the evidence was distorted by a series of erroneous rulings by the Court, the most egregious of which prevented the jury from reviewing performance testing conducted by renowned failure analysis experts that would have disproven the plaintiffs' theory of the case – a theory derived by a local resident with no previous automotive experience. Hyundai will seek an immediate appeal. Technical Background The 140 mph closing speed head-on collision crushed the steering knuckles of both vehicles involved, a Hyundai Tiburon and a Pontiac Grand Am.