2013 Honda Odyssey Ex-l Mini Passenger Van 4-door 3.5l on 2040-cars
Denver, Colorado, United States
Body Type:Mini Passenger Van
Vehicle Title:Salvage
Engine:3.5L 3471CC V6 GAS SOHC Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Private Seller
Make: Honda
Model: Odyssey
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Trim: EX-L Mini Passenger Van 4-Door
Options: Leather steering wheel cover, moon roof, Rear entertainment DVD, Sunroof, Leather Seats, CD Player
Drive Type: FWD
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag, Side Airbags
Mileage: 100
Power Options: Tri-zone climate controll, Cool box, Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Sub Model: EX-L
Exterior Color: LIGHT Blue
Disability Equipped: No
Interior Color: Tan
Number of Cylinders: 6
You are bidding on a vehicle in an excellent condition. Recently was purchased from a New York dealer. This vehicle was in a very minor flood. The water did not get inside at all. There are no rusting parts. It still smells like a brand new vehicle. This Van runs and drives like a dream, nothing is wrong with the engine and transmission. Everything works inside and out. The only light on is the engine light, because the bottom censer needs to be changed. I did not change it because it would cost me $600 from the dealer, so I was waiting to get the censer from after market or used parts, but I can't find one yet. According to Honda dealer it will pass the smog with engine light on. Other then that nothing is wrong with this Van. Tires and wheels are brand new. I bought the Van with only 4 miles, but then I drove another 96 miles to take the Van to Honda dealer for check up. Everything was fine inside and out. Dealer sticker is till on the window. The vehicle will have to be register in his/her state of residence, which may or my not involve some extra steps. The vehicle is sold "AS IS WITHOUT WARRANTY." I have the right to cancel this auction at anytime if the car is no longer available for sale.
Key features: Rear entertainment DVD player with set of wireless headphones, Moon roof, Power back left gate, Handset free Bluetooth connection, Cool box, Heated front seats and Tri-zone climate control.
I highly encourage buyers to come and inspect this Van in person if possible. Take a close look at those pictures and see it by your self. The Van has actual millage. This Van is stylish and drives like a dream. Come and take it home! You'll not be disappointed. PLEASE SERIOUS BUYERS ONLY.....
Honda Odyssey for Sale
2005 honda odyssey ex with oem tan leather seats, gold metallic exterior(US $12,900.00)
2012 honda odyssey lx mini passenger van 4-door 3.5l(US $11,995.00)
2005 honda odyssey ex-l w/res,clean,loaded(US $10,250.00)
2002 honda odyssey(US $6,995.00)
Honda odyssey - beautiful condition!!!(US $6,000.00)
2003 honda odyssey
Auto Services in Colorado
Windsor Car Care ★★★★★
West Side Auto Body & Towing ★★★★★
Toyexus Service ★★★★★
Tito`s Cash for Cars ★★★★★
Suzuki-Mccloskey ★★★★★
Red Rock Auto Clinic ★★★★★
Auto blog
Japanese automakers will seriously subsidize hydrogen fuel stations
Wed, Jul 1 2015Fresh off the announcement of the EPA-rated fuel economy and range figures for the Toyota Mirai, three of Japan's major automakers are throwing their weight behind hydrogen on the other side of the Pacific. Toyota, Nissan, and Honda are detailing their partnership in Japan to subsidize the creation of an expanded FCV refueling infrastructure there in the coming years. The plan could provide a much-needed boost for goals that are already looking to miss their targets. The partnership, which is called the Joint Hydrogen Infrastructure Support Project, is subsidizing a third of the annual operating expenses up to a maximum of 11 million yen ($90,000) for any hydrogen refueling station that applies and is accepted into the program. For now, the automakers plan to keep this running through around 2020. Toyota senior managing officer Kiyotaka Ise tells Bloomberg the whole thing over that time is expected to cost 5 billion to 6 billion yen ($40.5 million to $49 million). In addition to the money, the companies are trying to raise awareness about the alternative fuel to build popularity. Japan has been pushing extremely hard to build the FCV market there for quite some time by subsidizing both the models and building refueling stations for them. By the 2020 Olympics, the country's goal is to have 6,000 fuel cell vehicles on the roads and possibly even 100,000 of them by 2025. The cars to fulfill these lofty hopes are just gaining steam, though. For example, the Mirai is already experiencing high demand, and Honda is set to bring its new challenger in 2016. This announcement says Nissan is aiming a potential entry for 2017, as well. According to Bloomberg, the fuel cell industry in Japan is forecasted to balloon from 400 million yen (3.3 million) in the current fiscal year to 100 billion ($813 million) by 2025. Toyota, Nissan, and Honda Agree on Details of Joint Support for Hydrogen Infrastructure Development Toyota Motor Corporation, Nissan Motor Co., Ltd., and Honda Motor Co., Ltd. have agreed on key details regarding a new joint support project for the development of hydrogen station infrastructure in Japan. In addition to partially covering the operating costs of hydrogen stations, the three automakers have also agreed to help infrastructure companies deliver the best possible customer service and create a convenient, hassle-free refueling network for owners of fuel cell vehicles (FCVs).
Honda recalls 11,602 Accords for faulty front airbag modules
Mon, Apr 11 2016The Basics: While replacing the problematic Takata airbag inflators, Honda found that certain model year 2004-07 Accords – 11,602 of them – were fitted with the incorrect front passenger airbag modules. The modules installed were designed to South American specifications and do not meet US federal safety regulations. The Problem: Since the airbags do not meet federal regulations, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration deems them unsafe. Injuries/Deaths: None reported. The fix: Dealers will inspect the airbag modules on the models in question, and where necessary, replace them with the correct US-market units. If you own one: Owners can expect to hear from the manufacturer beginning May 5 in order to arrange for their vehicles to undergo the recall service. That is, unless your Accord was already repaired under the Takata inflator recall – in which case this problem was already addressed. RECALL Subject : Incorrect Passenger Air Bag Module/FMVSS 208 Report Receipt Date: MAR 30, 2016 NHTSA Campaign Number: 16V178000 Component(s): AIR BAGS Potential Number of Units Affected: 11,602 Manufacturer: Honda (American Honda Motor Co.) SUMMARY: Honda (American Honda Motor Co.) is recalling certain model year 2004-2007 Accord vehicles manufactured October 1, 2003, to August 17, 2007. The affected vehicles may have been assembled with an incorrect passenger frontal air bag module that does not comply with the advanced air bag requirements. As such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) number 208, "Occupant Crash Protection." CONSEQUENCE: An air bag module does not meet the advanced air bag requirements can increase the risk of injury or death in the event of a crash. REMEDY: Honda will notify owners, and dealers will inspect and replace the air bag module as necessary, free of charge. The recall is expected to begin May 5, 2016. Owners may contact Honda customer service at 1-800-999-1009. Honda's number for this recall is JZ3. NOTES: Owners may also contact the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Vehicle Safety Hotline at 1-888-327-4236 (TTY 1-800-424-9153), or go to www.safercar.gov. ### Statement by American Honda Regarding Passenger Front Airbag Module Recall: 2004-2007 Honda Accord Apr 8, 2016 - TORRANCE, Calif.
2020 Toyota Highlander vs other 3-row crossovers: There can only be one!
Fri, Dec 20 2019We've done quite a few spec comparison posts involving three-row family crossovers, and when included, the Toyota Highlander has always been the runt of the group. While the rest increasingly seemed to be benchmarking each other toward greater girth, the Highlander was the outlier. That changes a bit for the 2020 Toyota Highlander, but only a bit. It's now larger and more competitive, specifically in regards to the amount of cargo space aft of the third-row seat. As you can see below, this aligns the Highlander most closely to its long-time competitor the 2020 Honda Pilot. However, let's see how it stacks up to others in the segment, which is heavily populated now, so for the sake of space, we've selected the newest entries: Kia Telluride, Hyundai Palisade, Subaru Ascent and Ford Explorer. The order in which they are presented is random. Performance and fuel economy The 2020 Highlander is more than 200 pounds lighter than its predecessor, but has the same 295-horsepower V6 engine that was already one of the strongest in the segment. We'd say that would give it a leg up, but the Pilot and Explorer have proven to be sprinters, delivering 0-60 times in the low-6 range by some publications' stopwatches (or VBoxes, whatever). We don't expect the Highlander to beat them, but it may dip into the 6's. The heavy, less-powerful Subaru Ascent is most likely to take up the rear. It's fuel economy of 23 mpg combined also matches the Highlander and Explorer for segment-best. Remember, however, that the Explorer's turbocharged inline-four engine is likely more susceptible to differences in driving style (read: a heavy foot). Of course, if you're really interested in fuel economy, the Highlander and Explorer are the only vehicles in the segment to offer hybrid versions. The Ford Explorer Hybrid puts a greater emphasis on performance, however, resulting in lower estimates of 25 mpg combined (AWD) and 28 mpg combined (FWD). By contrast, the new 2020 Toyota Highlander Hybrid is estimated to return 36 mpg combined. Passenger and cargo space According to Highlander chief engineer Yoshikazu Saeki, he had a choice of two directions with the new Highlander. He could have indeed made it bigger, matching these very competitors, especially in terms of third-row and cargo space. Or, he could have maintained a smaller-than-average size. He obviously chose the latter. First, it was the size customers had come to expect. Would they be put off by something bigger?























