Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2009 Ex Used 1.8l I4 16v Automatic Fwd Coupe on 2040-cars

US $12,991.00
Year:2009 Mileage:63514 Color: Blue /
 Gray
Location:

Houston, Texas, United States

Houston, Texas, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:1.8L 1799CC l4 GAS SOHC Naturally Aspirated
For Sale By:Dealer
Body Type:Coupe
Fuel Type:GAS
VIN: 2HGFG12829H517020 Year: 2009
Interior Color: Gray
Make: Honda
Model: Civic
Warranty: No
Trim: EX Coupe 2-Door
Drive Type: FWD
Number of Doors: 2 Doors
Mileage: 63,514
Sub Model: EX
Number of Cylinders: 4
Exterior Color: Blue
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

Auto Services in Texas

Xtreme Customs Body and Paint ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 4524 Dyer St, Tornillo
Phone: (915) 584-1560

Woodard Paint & Body ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 3515 Ross Ave, Dfw
Phone: (214) 821-3310

Whitlock Auto Kare & Sale ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers
Address: 1325 Whitlock Ln 205, Shady-Shores
Phone: (972) 242-5454

Wesley Chitty Garage-Body Shop ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 805 W Frank St, Van
Phone: (903) 962-3819

Weathersbee Electric Co ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Electric Service
Address: 7 E Highland Blvd, San-Angelo
Phone: (325) 655-7555

Wayside Radiator Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Radiators Automotive Sales & Service
Address: 1815 Wayside Dr, Pasadena
Phone: (713) 923-4122

Auto blog

NACTOY announces top nine finalists for Car, Truck and Utility of the Year

Thu, Nov 16 2023

Finalists for the 2024 North American Car, Truck and Utility Vehicle of the Year (NACTOY) Awards were announced at this year’s L.A. Auto Show. This whittles the field down to nine vehicles in total, with the winners scheduled to be announced on January 4, 2024. The finalists in their respective categories: Car category: Honda Accord, Hyundai Ioniq 6, Toyota Prius Truck category: Chevrolet Colorado, Chevrolet Silverado EV, Ford Super Duty Utility category: Genesis Electrified GV70, Kia EV9, Volvo EX30 These nine cars were chosen from a list of 25, which was previously narrowed down from a list of 52 eligible vehicles. Notable misses include the Chevrolet Corvette E-Ray, Toyota GR Corolla, GMC Canyon, Ford Ranger, Chevrolet Blazer EV, Chevrolet Equinox EV, Mazda CX-90 and Toyota Grand Highlander, among others. Jurors will now evaluate the final nine through the end of the year to determine the four winners. Autoblog Editor-in-Chief Greg Migliore is among the jurors. Green LA Auto Show Chevrolet Ford Genesis GM Honda Hyundai Kia Toyota Volvo Truck Crossover Hatchback SUV Electric Hybrid Luxury Off-Road Vehicles Performance Sedan

Consumer Reports says these are the worst new cars of 2014

Thu, 27 Feb 2014

Consumer Reports has announced its annual list of worst vehicles, a cringe-inducing contrast to its list of top vehicles. Ignominiously leading the way in 2014 is Chrysler, which has a staggering seven models listed.
Jeep nearly sweeps the small SUV segment by itself, with its Compass, Patriot and 2.4-liter version of the new Cherokee, while the only midsize sedans listed by CR were the Chrysler 200 and Dodge Avenger. The new Dodge Dart and the Dodge Journey round out CR's condemnation of Chrysler.
Ford is taking heat as well, with the Taurus, Edge and their counterparts from Lincoln all listed as the worst vehicles in their respective segments. Toyota doesn't fare much better, with its Lexus IS, Scion iQ and tC also making the list.

It turns out Takata isn't willing to expand airbag recall nationally after all

Wed, Dec 3 2014

There have been "approximately 0.000006 failures per air bag deployment, which is far below the failure rate" of most recalls, Takata claims. Takata has seemingly made an about face following reports that it would expand its regional airbag recall into a nationwide repair effort, issuing a scathing, four-page letter rebutting allegations by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and its Office of Defects while simultaneously attacking the government's handling of the situation. The Japanese supplier claims in its letter that the "currently available, reliable information does not support a nationwide determination of a safety defect," arguing that there were "approximately 0.000006 failures per air bag deployment, which is far below the failure rate in the vast majority of the thousands of recalls," The Detroit News reports. Takata then breaks down the two specific incidents mentioned in NHTSA's original recall request letter, a 2005 Honda Accord and 2007 Ford Mustang. Referencing the two crashes, NHTSA Administrator David Friedman said last month "one incident is an anomaly, but two are a trend." The supplier, though, argues the Honda issue is already being covered by that company's soon-to-be-national recall (more on that in a moment). The company then goes on to point out that neither Takata nor NHTSA has been able to analyze the Mustang's airbag inflator, saying that such a lack of examination meant there was "no way to ascertain what actually occurred during the incident, whether any inflator ruptured, and whether any inflator rupture that may have occurred was related to the incidents that led to the current regional campaigns." Takata alleges that NHTSA has disobeyed its own statutes. Takata also took the opportunity to take a few swipes at NHTSA's behavior during the airbag scandal, saying it was "very surprised to receive" a recall request letter because the ODI had yet to even receive the company's responses to a pair of special orders. It also alleged that NHTSA was disobeying its own statute, which says only manufacturers of vehicles and replacement equipment can "decide in good faith whether their products contain a safety related defect," and that the government can only "issue an initial decision that a safety-related defect exists" to those same entities.