2013 Honda Cr-v Lx Awd Cloth Seats Bk/camera Eco Bluetooth $499 Ship on 2040-cars
Stafford, Texas, United States
Vehicle Title:Clear
For Sale By:Dealer
Engine:2.4L 2354CC l4 GAS DOHC Naturally Aspirated
Body Type:Sport Utility
Fuel Type:GAS
Year: 2013
Make: Honda
Model: CR-V
Trim: LX Sport Utility 4-Door
Disability Equipped: No
Doors: 4
Drive Type: AWD
Drivetrain: All Wheel Drive
Mileage: 18
Sub Model: LX
Number of Cylinders: 4
Exterior Color: Silver
Interior Color: Gray
Honda CR-V for Sale
- 2010 cr-v awd leather moon premium sound
- Honda cr/v se// my daughter's loss, ... your gain
- 2011 crv ex 4wd,automatic,sunroof,cloth,6 disk cd,17in wheels,20k,we finance!!(US $19,900.00)
- 2012 honda cr-v ex-l sport utility 4-door 2.4l(US $25,900.00)
- 2002 honda cr-v ex sport utility 4-door 2.4l(US $5,500.00)
- 2011 honda cr-v - 33k miles - beautiful!(US $16,850.00)
Auto Services in Texas
Z Rated Automotive Sales & Service ★★★★★
Xtreme Tinting & Alarms ★★★★★
Wayne`s World of Cars ★★★★★
Vaughan`s Auto Glass ★★★★★
Vandergriff Honda ★★★★★
Trade Lane Motors ★★★★★
Auto blog
Honda speeds towards its dreams with new Civic Type R Concept [w/videos]
Tue, 04 Mar 2014A war is coming. It's been brewing for some time between the top-performing hot hatches, and will be determined by the ultimate bragging rights: the lap record at the Nürburgring for front-drive cars. Renault claimed it and reclaimed it again with successive versions of the Megane RS, then Seat took it by some margin with the new Leon Cupra. But this could take it from both.
It's the new Honda Civic Type R - or at least a conceptual preview of the one to follow. We drove an early prototype of the forthcoming Japanese hot hatch while in town for the Tokyo Motor Show a few months ago, where Honda made no secret of its Eiffel-bound aspirations. Now it has taken a big step closer with the concept you see here.
Previewing the extreme styling that will set the next Type R apart from ordinary Civics (or the European-spec hatchback on which it's based), the concept has a giant rear spoiler, enlarged grilles, hood vents and widened fenders packing both 20-inch alloys and additional air vents.
Tier 1 suppliers call GM the worst OEM to work with
Mon, 12 May 2014Among automakers with a big US presence, General Motors is the worst to work for, according to a new survey from Tier 1 automotive suppliers, conducted by Planning Perspectives, Inc.
The Detroit-based manufacturer, which has been under fire following the ignition switch recall and its accompanying scandal, finished behind six other automakers with big US manufacturing operations. Suppliers had issues with trust and communications, as well as intellectual property protection. GM was also the least likely to allow suppliers to raise their prices in the face of unexpected increases in material cost, all of which contributed to 55 percent of suppliers saying their relationship with GM was "poor to very poor."
GM's cross-town competitors didn't fare much better. Chrysler finished in fifth place, ahead of GM and behind Dearborn-based Ford, which was passed for third place this year by Nissan. Toyota took the top marks, while Honda captured second place.
Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating
Mon, Aug 6 2018Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.
2040Cars.com © 2012-2024. All Rights Reserved.
Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.
Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the 2040Cars User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
0.035 s, 7783 u