In The Wrapper Turbocharged Survivor -1991 Gmc Syclone Pickup - 1946 Miles on 2040-cars
Lakeland, Florida, United States
INCREDIBLE TWO OWNER ROCKETSHIP 1991 GMC SYCLONE PICKUP TWO OWNER - IMMACULATE ORIGINAL CONDITION The GMC Syclone is a high-performance version of the GMC Sonoma pickup truck. Produced in 1991, the Syclone At the time it was introduced, the Syclone was the quickest stock
pickup truck being produced in the world. Both the Syclone and Typhoon trucks featured a Mitsubishi TD06-17C 8 cm? turbocharger[1] and Garrett water/air intercooler In 1991 Syclones were available in black only. 1992 models were to be
offered in a wider range of colors before they The Syclone, Typhoon, and Sonoma GT were built for GMC by Production Automotive Services of Troy, Michigan and sold through dealerships.
Now it will look great in your garage. The car is equipped with the factory turbocharged 4.3 Liter V-6 engine. Garage kept, pampered and serviced, this truck could not be nicer. FEATURES AND OPTION INFORMATION I SPECIALIZE IN LOCATING PRISTINE CLASSIC CARS. EXCELLENT HISTORY OF CAR EXPORTS FOR OUT OF COUNTRY BUYERS.
OR EMAIL sales@mjcclassiccars.com
Note this and all vehicles sold by us on eBay or our website are as/is where is.The information, products, and services published on our website may include inaccuracies or typographical errors. MJC Classic Cars LLC and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information, products, and services contained on this website for any purpose. All such information is provided "AS-IS" without warranty of any kind. MJC Classic Cars LLC and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall MJC Classic Cars LLC and/or its suppliers be liable for any direct, indirect, punitive, incidental, special or consequential damages arising out of or in any connected with the use of this web site or with any delay or inability to use this website, or for any information obtained through this website, or otherwise arising out of the use of this web site, whether based on contract, tort, strict liability or otherwise , even if MJC Classic Cars LLC or any of its suppliers has been advised of the possibility of damages. Because some states/ jurisdictions do not allow the exclusion or limitation of liability for consequential or incidental damages, the above limitation may not apply to you... AUTOCHECK REPORT VERIFIES MILEAGE PLEASE CHECK OUT ALL MY OTHER EBAY AUCTIONS !!!!!!! THERE ARE MANY PIX BELOW OF THE INTERIOR, ENGINE & BED COMPARTMENTS PLEASE GIVE THEM TIME TO LOAD FOR VIEWING... PLEASE CALL WITH QUESTIONS OR FOR A BUY IT NOW CALL MIKE @ 863-944-8615 OR EMAIL sales@mjcclassiccars.com PLEASE CALL WITH QUESTIONS OR FOR A BUY IT NOW CALL MIKE @ 863-944-8615 OR EMAIL sales@mjcclassiccars.com |
GMC Sonoma for Sale
- 1992 gmc sonoma, no reserve
- 1995 chevy s10 zr2 gmc sonoma highrider 54k orig. miles extended cab pickup v6(US $3,995.00)
- 1991 gmc syclone,marlboro edition,1 of 10 made,very rare and hard to find!!!!!!!(US $74,995.00)
- 2004 gmc sonoma sls crew cab 4x4 zr5(US $9,900.00)
- 2003 gmc sonoma sl standard cab pickup 2-door 4.3l(US $2,100.00)
- 1996 gmc sonoma s10 sls 2.2 4 cylinder 5 speed short bed 2 wheel drive
Auto Services in Florida
Yokley`s Acdelco Car Care Ctr ★★★★★
Wing Motors Inc ★★★★★
Whitt Rentals ★★★★★
Weston Towing Co ★★★★★
VIP Car Wash ★★★★★
Vargas Tire Super Center ★★★★★
Auto blog
2015 Chevy Colorado, GMC Canyon airbag problem causes recall
Tue, 14 Oct 2014
The recall affects 2,432 vehicles, though only 138 had actually reached consumers.
General Motors quickly fixed an airbag-wiring problem with the 2015 Chevrolet Colorado and GMC Canyon, but is still conducting a small recall to repair the midsize trucks that are launching this fall.
Top horsepower-per-dollar cars in 2017
Tue, Feb 17 2015Bang for the buck. That quasi-scientific statistic is bandied about by motor heads everywhere from classrooms to barrooms, though the truth of the matter is that it's exceedingly complex to measure. A fair performance-per-dollar index would include something like cross-referencing MSRP (Manufacturers Suggested Retail Price) with point-to-point times on a track or driving route, which is obviously hard to do comprehensively. But, for the sheer joy of talking about cars and playing with a big spreadsheet, there's always the horsepower-per-dollar index, which is more straightforward, albeit hilariously flawed. There are vagaries even with this simple formula, of course: MSRP for vehicles can change at a moment's notice, to say nothing of the bottom-line shifting that happens with local deals or showroom negotiation. For this list we're running with the straight MSRP wherever possible, and as recently reported as we can get it. All the vehicles on this list are 2017 models, and all trims are reported where the lowest price and differing power levels intersect. Some choices were made for personal preference and some for sanity, avoiding things like all 48 trim levels of the Ford Transit, all with the same horsepower). If this list were a simple top ten, or even a top fifty, you'd be bored to tears with all the red, white and blue that is represented. Following perfectly with conventional wisdom, American cars really do lead the world where hp/$ is concerned. So, for the sake of variety (and the sheer joy of seeing a minivan 'win' one round of this thing) I've sorted out some top five and bottom five lists for broad power categories. Let's dive in. Less Than 100 Horsepower Okay, okay, this is hardly a category we'll grant you. But we've often tried to click off all the sub-100-hp cars on sale in the US, and making this list gave us an excuse. It also illustrates that none of these smallish vehicles bring cheap horsepower to the table - for that you'll need a motorcycle. The segment-leading Chevy Spark (above) asks just over $139 for each hp, and that Smart Fortwo Electric Drive has hp on sale for about the same price as its very distant family cousin, the Mercedes-Benz SL65 AMG (insert your favorite Smart joke here... we know you want to).
Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating
Mon, Aug 6 2018Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.