Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2004 Gmc Savana 3500 Base Extended Cargo Van 3-door 6.0l on 2040-cars

Year:2004 Mileage:193389 Color: Yellow /
 Gray
Location:

Auburn, Washington, United States

Auburn, Washington, United States
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Extended Cargo Van
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:6.0L V8 Gasoline
Fuel Type:CNG
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: 1GDHG31U541904942 Year: 2004
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: GMC
Model: Savana
Trim: 3500
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Drive Type: RWD
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control
Mileage: 193,389
Sub Model: Savana 3500
Exterior Color: Yellow
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Interior Color: Gray
Condition: UsedA vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections.Seller Notes:"2004 GMC Savana 3500 Box TruckVery Well kept Box Truck194xxx miles. All Highway.Includes Cruise ControlAir Ride suspensionExtra Leaf on the main spring 6.0L V8 RWDBuilt in Sleeper"

2004 GMC Savana 3500 Box Truck

Very Well kept Box Truck
194xxx miles
All Highway
Includes:
 Cruise Control
Air Ride suspension
Extra Leaf on the main spring
6.0L V8 RWD
Built in sleeper

Auto Services in Washington

Werner`s Crash Shop ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 710 Taylor Ave N, Kingston
Phone: (206) 285-0780

Wayne`s Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 5018 N 46th St, Burton
Phone: (253) 759-3451

Washington Auto Credit ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 1905 Cooper Point Rd SW, Anderson-Island
Phone: (360) 412-4120

Universal Auto Body & Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 1209 E Fir St, Seahurst
Phone: (206) 329-7198

Tri-Cities Battery-Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers
Address: 2104 N 4th Ave, Pasco
Phone: (509) 545-1473

The Audio Experts with Discount Car Stereo ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Radios & Stereo Systems, Automobile Alarms & Security Systems
Address: 23446 Pacific Hwy S, Des-Moines
Phone: (206) 824-5875

Auto blog

GM also sheds parts from its pickups to boost payload ratings

Thu, 31 Jul 2014

The row between Ford and Ram over who boasts the best-in-class tow rating for heavy duty pickups has revealed a number of things. Chief among them is a report that Ford removes items like the spare tire, jack, radio and center console from its vehicles in a bid to lower its base curb weight and therefore keep the truck's gross vehicle weight rating down.
For those that need a refresher, GVWR is the vehicle's curb weight plus its maximum payload. A lower GVWR allows Ford to station its F-450 among the so-called Class III pickups, despite the fact that internally, it has the makings of a more brutish Class IV truck.
Ford explains away these deletions, saying a customer could order their vehicle in such a manner. It has also come to light that Ford is not the only automaker to engage in such practices.

Should heavy-duty pickup trucks have window stickers with fuel mileage estimates?

Sat, Sep 23 2017

If you were to stroll into your nearest Chevrolet, Ford, GMC, Nissan, or Ram dealership, you'd find a bunch of pickup trucks. Most of those would have proper window stickers labeled with things like base prices, options prices, location of manufacture, and, crucially, fuel economy estimates. But you'd also run across a number of heavy-duty trucks with no such fuel mileage data from the Environmental Protection Agency. The EPA doesn't require automakers to publish the valuable miles-per-gallon measurement for vehicles with gross weight ratings that exceed 8,500 pounds. That makes it difficult for consumers to compare behemoths powered by turbocharged diesel engines – between one another, and between smaller, gasoline-fueled trucks. Consumer Reports doesn't think it should be this way, and it's spearheading an effort (PDF link) to get the government to require manufacturers to publish fuel economy estimates. In its own testing, CR found that heavy-duty pickups powered by Ford's Power Stroke, GM's Duramax, and FCA's Cummins diesel engines (which doesn't include the Ram's EcoDiesel) get worse fuel mileage than their lighter-duty gas-powered siblings. We're not so sure HD-truck buyers are unaware of this fact – big diesels don't really come into their own until big loads are placed in their beds or attached to their trailer hitches. Under heavy workloads, the diesel trucks will almost certainly return greater efficiency than a similar gas-powered truck. What's more, HD trucks with lumbering diesels in general make the driver feel more confident while towing due to greater torque at low engine RPM than gas trucks. They also offer greater max-weight limits. Still, we agree EPA fuel mileage estimates should be offered for heavy-duty pickups. And we think the comparisons provided by Consumer Reports might be interesting to potential buyers. Click here to see the results of CR's tests, and let us know what you think using the poll below. Related Video: Featured Gallery 2017 Ford F-Series Super Duty: First Drive View 22 Photos News Source: Consumer Reports Government/Legal Green Read This Chevrolet Ford GMC Nissan RAM Fuel Efficiency Truck Commercial Vehicles Diesel Vehicles poll gmc sierra hd chevy silverado hd

PickupTrucks.com's latest test results in a familiar winner [w/video]

Wed, 19 Jun 2013

PickupTrucks.com has gone and thrown the latest batch of half-ton pickups into a cage match to see who would come out on top. The site put the 2014 Chevrolet Silverado 1500, GMC Sierra 1500, 2013 Ford F-150, Ram 1500, Toyota Tundra and Nissan Titan through a battery of tests. Those included 0-60 miles per hour acceleration, 60-0 mph deceleration, fuel economy, a hill climb, and payload and towing. They even threw the rigs on an autocross course to evaluate overall handling. Each truck was given points based on how it scored in each evaluation.
Who came out on top? Somewhat surprisingly, the 2013 Ford F-150 walked away with the gold, though fewer than 50 points separated first and fourth place. Head over to PickupTrucks.com to read the full evaluation and the final results. You may be shocked to see exactly where some of the segment's newest additions placed. You can also watch a video on the test below.