2014 Gmc Sierra 1500 Slt on 2040-cars
3200 East Main Street, Richmond, Indiana, United States
Engine:5.3L V8 16V GDI OHV
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1GTV2VEC9EZ285719
Stock Num: 214217
Make: GMC
Model: Sierra 1500 SLT
Year: 2014
Exterior Color: Cobalt Blue
Options: Drive Type: 4WD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 6
* * Driving From Out of Town? Call Ahead to Ensure Availability: *877-884-3389* Contact Chad Mitchell for Internet Special Pricing!! ** Fast and Friendly Approval Over the Phone** Be sure to print this ad and bring it to the Dealership , ask for Chad Mitchell and receive my Best Internet Deal **Boat and motorcycle trades welcome. We are a licensed watercraft and motorcycle dealer. We will consider ANYTHING you can pour gas into! Call, Text, Email or Leave a Message for more information! 877-884-3389 www.StudebakerAutos.com Studebaker Buick-Pontiac-GMC At Studebaker, whatever it takes! www.StudebakerAutos.com Instant Financing Available for ALL Credit Situations! Call Today for Availability: 877-884-3389!! We make every attempt to ensure that vehicle and content descriptions are accurate. Please call toll-free to verify ad information: 877-884-3389!!
GMC Sierra 1500 for Sale
- 2005 gmc sierra 1500(US $11,997.00)
- 2010 gmc sierra 1500 sle(US $22,997.00)
- 2011 gmc sierra 1500 slt(US $28,997.00)
- 2014 gmc sierra 1500 base(US $29,160.00)
- 2010 gmc sierra 1500 slt(US $31,997.00)
- 2013 gmc sierra 1500 sle
Auto Services in Indiana
western metals ★★★★★
Webb Ford Inc ★★★★★
Weatherford Auto & Truck Service ★★★★★
Watson Automotive ★★★★★
Wagner`s Auto Service ★★★★★
Tom O`Brien Chrysler Jeep Dodge -Greenwood ★★★★★
Auto blog
Chevy and GMC trucks get CNG option pricing
Fri, 18 Apr 2014Chevrolet and GMC have clued us in to pricing of the bi-fuel option for the 2015 Silverado and Sierra 2500HD CNG and 3500HD CNG pickups: it starts at $9,500; we're still missing the rest of the pricing inferred by the word "starts," however. If you remember from the Chicago Auto Show introduction, the 6.0-liter V8 puts out 360 horsepower and 380 pound-feet of torque when drinking gas, 301 hp and 333 lb-ft when inhaling CNG.
Chevrolet figures that a bi-fuel Silverado HD is worth $2,000 in savings if driven 19,500 miles on CNG and 7,500 miles on gasoline in the span of a year, a recoup rate easily attainable to high-mileage fleet owners. It can be specced on double- and crew-cab pickups with single rear wheels, not on dualies.
The 2015 Chevrolet Express and GMC Savana short-wheelbase passenger and cargo vans also get CNG options, starting at $10,825 for the three-tank system, and $12,090 for the four-tank system that can only be had on the cargo hauler. You'll find a bit more info on all of the permutations in the press release below.
GM announces 6 recalls covering nearly 720k cars
Wed, 23 Jul 2014General Motors has announced yet another sprawling recall campaign, with six separate elements covering 717,950 vehicles on US roads. At this point in 2014, it's starting to seem like there are more days with a GM recall than without. Perhaps most troubling about this latest volley, though, is that every vehicle is from the past few years, indicating that GM's quality woes may not be limited to pre-bankruptcy vehicles.
The largest element of this latest campaign covers 414,333 units, and includes the 2011 to 2012 Chevrolet Camaro, 2010 to 2012 Chevy Equinox, GMC Terrain and Cadillac SRX and the 2011 to 2012 Buick Regal and LaCrosse. Only vehicles with powered, height-adjustable seats are covered. In these particular cars and crossovers, the bolt that secures the height adjuster actuator may loosen of its own accord and in some cases fall out completely. If this happens, the seats will be able to move both up and down. GM claims the vehicles are safe to drive, provided drivers don't vertically adjust their seats. This particular issue has caused one crash and three injuries.
The largest element of this latest campaign covers 414,333 units, including the Chevrolet Camaro and Equinox, GMC Terrain, Cadillac SRX and the Buick Regal and LaCrosse.
Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating
Mon, Aug 6 2018Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.