Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2013 Ford Transit Connect Xlt Mini Cargo Van 4-door 2.0l on 2040-cars

Year:2013 Mileage:18500
Location:

Saint Charles, Illinois, United States

Saint Charles, Illinois, United States
Advertising:

2013 Ford Transit Connect XLT Cargo Van
18500 Miles.
Synthetic Oil only every 5000 miles.
Tinted Windows
Tinted tail lights.
Tires in great shape.
Brakes 50%
Cloth interior - Gray
Aluminum Work Shelves in rear area.
Great condition. Clean. Normal wear and tear.

Auto Services in Illinois

World Class Motor Cars ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 1245 Ogden Ave, Warrenville
Phone: (630) 493-1600

Wilkins Hyundai-Mazda ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 750 N York St, Elmhurst
Phone: (630) 279-3000

Unibody ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 1891 N Milwaukee Ave, Brookfield
Phone: (773) 235-1334

Turpin Chevrolet Inc ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 1048 S Chicago St, Orion
Phone: (309) 944-2173

Tuffy Auto Service Centers ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair
Address: 6574 E Riverside Blvd, Garden-Prairie
Phone: (815) 639-1239

Triple T Car Wash Lube & Detail Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Car Wash, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 1905 W Bradley Ave, Champaign
Phone: (217) 352-9200

Auto blog

From Expedition to Navigator: our predictions for Lincoln's SUV

Tue, Feb 7 2017

In the midst of all the buzz surrounding the new aluminum Ford Expedition and Expedition Max, we remembered the other large SUV the Ford Motor Company showed last year, the Lincoln Navigator concept. And since the Navigator has historically been built on the Expedition platform, we figured there's no better time to focus some of our predictions for the big Lincoln. First off, let's take a look at design. Having seen the new Expedition, we're fairly confident that the Navigator will look almost exactly like its concept. The strong similarities between two mean the Expedition serves as a preview of what a production Navigator will look like. For example, both vehicles' greenhouses we can see that the shape of the C-pillars are nearly identical. The only difference is that the Expedition's are painted body color, while the Navigator's are painted black. Additionally, the character line running along the top of the doors on both vehicles is roughly the same height. The same goes for the more subtle crease near the bottom of the doors. We also see no reason why Lincoln wouldn't use the full width taillights, fender vent, and grille treatment it used on the concept. Those are all easy design changes to create differentiation, and they're all right inline with the cues set by the Continental. View 15 Photos For powertrain, we're pretty certain the 400-horsepower 3.5-liter EcoBoost V6 previewed on the concept is a certainty now. The Expedition and Expedition Max will be offered with a 3.5-liter EcoBoost as well, so we know it will fit. We expect the Expedition's engine will produce 375 horsepower and 470 lb-ft of torque as it does in the F-150. That's less power than the Navigator concept, but it would be reasonable to make the production Navigator a bit more powerful than its lowly Ford brethren to help justify the increased price tag. Towing capacity will probably be about the same between the Ford and Lincoln, which should be something over 9,000 pounds. The Navigator will probably use the same two-wheel-drive and all-wheel-drive drivetrains, too. Inside is where the Expedition and Navigator will likely differ the most, particularly in seating. The Expedition offers seating for up to eight with an available second-row bench seat, and the Navigator concept had captain's chairs for every row. We're expecting the Navigator will only offer second-row captain's chairs since the cramped third row would be a waste of nice buckets.

Toyota, Ford and Honda again top Consumer Reports Car-Brand Perception Survey

Fri, 01 Feb 2013

Consumer Reports has released its annual Car-Brand Perception Survey, and the list looks awfully familiar. The top six brands are identical to last year's results, with Toyota, Ford and Honda continuing to occupy the podium. All told, Toyota walked away with 133 points, putting it 15 ahead of second-place Ford. Honda jumped 26 points this year, narrowing Ford's lead to just four points in total.
Consumer Reports polls buyers from across the country on how they see multiple brands in seven categories, including quality, safety, value, performance, design/style, technology/innovation and environmentally friendly/green. Researchers then combine the findings to come up with the total brand score.
While value and performance remain important to buyers, CR found quality and safety are still on top when it comes to significance. Scion and Mitsubishi found themselves at the bottom of the pack with the worst score of all, tied at just six points. Ram, Fiat and Mini filled out the lowest five with scores of seven, eight and 10 points, respectively. You can read the full press release below for more information, or head over to the Consumer Reports site.

Ford-sponsored survey says a third of Brits have snapped a 'selfie' while driving [w/videos]

Fri, 08 Aug 2014

Talking on the phone while driving isn't advisable, and texting while driving is downright dangerous. Considering those truths, the fact that we even need to point this out this is incredibly disturbing: taking "selfies" while behind the wheel is exceptionally stupid. But, it's a thing that a third of 18- to 24-year-old British drivers have copped to doing, according to a new study from Ford.
Ford, through its Driving Skills for Life program, surveyed 7,000 smartphone owners from across Europe, all aged between 18 and 24, and found that young British drivers were more likely to snap a selfie while behind the wheel than their counterparts in Germany, France, Romania, Italy, Spain and Belgium.
According to the study, the average selfie takes 14 seconds, which, while traveling at 60 miles per hour, is long enough to travel over the length of nearly four football fields (the Ford study uses soccer fields, but we translated it to football, because, you know, America). That's an extremely dangerous distance to not be focused on the road.