Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1979 Ford Thunderbird Base Hardtop 2-door 5.8l on 2040-cars

Year:1979 Mileage:35000
Location:

Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Des Moines, Iowa, United States

1979 Ford Thunderbird. I bought it back in 2005 from an elderly lady but have only put on roughly 2,000 miles since then. Runs and drives very well. Has great air conditioning and new tires. Only has 35,000 miles. Any questions, please call me at 515-249-7311.

Auto Services in Iowa

Waln Repair & Collision Ctr ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Windshield Repair, Glass-Auto, Plate, Window, Etc
Address: 21 Williams Blvd, Fairfax
Phone: (319) 846-3434

Sorensen Auto Plaza ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Financing Services, Self Storage
Address: 1100 W Sheridan Ave, Shenandoah
Phone: (712) 246-1600

Shade Tree Auto ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Body Parts
Address: 3450 SE Miehe Dr, Adel
Phone: (515) 986-5241

Quality Lube Center Incorporated ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Auto Transmission
Address: 300 5th Ave SW, Brunsville
Phone: (712) 560-1710

Pippert Cars & Trucks ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers, Used Truck Dealers
Address: 2047 Highway T47, Gladbrook
Phone: (641) 473-3121

Nebraska Tire & Automotive Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 5034 S 24th St, Crescent
Phone: (402) 731-9166

Auto blog

Watch this awesome R/C car chase scene made with cardboard and glue

Fri, 22 Feb 2013

It never ceases to amaze us how much video production talent you can find on YouTube, especially when considering movies like Battleship actually exist on the silver screen. It's even better, of course, when cars are involved, which is why we can't stop watching this car chase between a pair of radio controlled Ford Mustangs.
Racing through a detailed set built in the middle of a public street using just "cardboard, hot glue and spray paint," this video is possibly even greater than The Greatest R/C Car Chase Ever that we saw last year. With the exception of a fruit stand and/or a plate-glass window being carried across the street, this has all the makings of a classic cliché chase scene.
Scroll down to watch the scaled-down action ensue as well as the full-scale conclusion.

2015 Ford F-150 to get 2.7-liter EcoBoost?

Mon, 30 Dec 2013

As we prepare for the arrival of the all-new, next-generation Ford F-150, rumors about the new truck are picking up steam. Naturally, many of said rumors aren't just related to the way the truck will look (it's expected to take design cues from the Atlas concept shown above), they're tied to what's going to motivate the Blue Oval mainstay, with Ford's EcoBoost range likely to play an increasingly key role. While we're still expecting the current 3.5-liter, twin-turbocharged V6 to retain its position as a premium alternative to Ford's naturally aspirated V6 and V8, a Canadian automotive news site is proposing that the Dearborn automaker is also preparing a new, more fuel-efficient downsized EcoBoost option.
Autos.ca is reporting that a new, 2.7-liter, twin-turbocharged V6 could find its way into the lighter, aluminum-intensive truck. The new engine supposedly makes use of asymmetrical turbos to generate 320 horsepower and 370 pound-feet of torque - substantially more impressive numbers than the current 3.7-liter base engine's 302 ponies and 278 lb-ft - while offering improved fuel economy and emissions. The new 2.7 EcoBoost (internally dubbed "Nano") isn't expected to supplant the naturally aspirated V6 as the F-150's base engine, it's expected to slot in above directly it.
Naturally, we're prescribing more than a few grains of salt to go with these rumors, at least until Ford debuts the next F-150 at the 2014 Detroit Auto Show, a reveal we'll be covering in a mere two weeks.

Consumer Reports criticizes small turbo engines for misleading performance, fuel economy claims [w/video]

Tue, 05 Feb 2013

Consumer Reports has taken aim at at small-displacement, forced-induction engines, saying the powerplants don't manage to deliver on automaker fuel economy claims. Manufacturers have long held that smaller, turbocharged engines pack all power of their larger displacement cousins with significantly better fuel economy, but the research organization says that despite scoring high EPA economy numbers, the engines are no better than conventional drivetrains in both categories. Jake Fisher, director of automotive testing for Consumer Reports, says the forced induction options "are often slower and less fuel efficient than larger four and six-cylinder engines."
Specifically, CR calls out the new Ford Fusion equipped with the automaker's Ecoboost 1.6-liter four-cylinder engine. The institute's researchers found the engine, which is a $795 option over the base 2.5-liter four-cylinder, fails to match competitors in acceleration and served up 25 miles per gallon in testing, putting the sedan dead last among other midsize options.
The Chevrolet Cruze, Hyundai Sonata Turbo and Ford Escape 2.0T all got dinged for the same troubles, though Consumer Reports has found the turbo 2.0-liter four-cylinder in the BMW 328i does deliver on its promises. You can check out the full press release below. You can also read the full study on the Consumer Reports site, or scroll down for a short video recap.