1972 Ford Thunderbird Base Hardtop 2-door 7.5l on 2040-cars
Bayfield, Colorado, United States
Engine:7.5L 7539CC 460Cu. In. V8 GAS OHV Naturally Aspirated
Transmission:Automatic
Vehicle Title:Clear
Body Type:Hardtop
For Sale By:Private Seller
Make: Ford
Mileage: 122,999
Model: Thunderbird
Exterior Color: Green
Trim: Base Hardtop 2-Door
Interior Color: Green
Drive Type: U/K
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Number of Cylinders: 8
1972 Ford Thunderbird
122,999 miles
Runs good!
Received this car in lieu of payment for a loan. Because of this we do not know the history of the vehicle.
WE ARE SELLING THIS VEHICLE STRICTLY AS-IS.
This is a 41 year old vehicle with many flaws, however, this vehicle drives and is all original with the exception of the stereo and wheels.
We believe that this vehicle will make a great restoration project.
Happy Bidding!!!
It is impossible to completely describe a vehicle like this. Following is a description of the condition. Please use this in conjunction with the pictures.
This car is all original except for the radio and the wheels. The body is good except for a little rust around the wheel wells and a small ding on the truck. The headliner is really good. The front seats are showing wear with some holes (pictured). The dash has a crack on top as pictured. The soft top is cracking in the back in particular although the roof portion is pretty good. The front grill has a small piece broken out. The back right break light lense has had a repair as pictured. Some of the other lenses have small cracks. The windshield has a crack. The stereo has been replaced. It has custom wheels and tires in good shape. We acquired this vehicle in leiu of a debt and do not know the history of it. The motor and transmission are working properly. Both leak a little, however. The power features of the vehicle appear to all work as they should. This vehicle is being sold strictly AS-IS. No warranty or guarantee.
Ford Thunderbird for Sale
2003 ford thunderbird premium chromes hard top 45k miles 6 disc cd heated seats(US $17,995.00)
2002 ford t-bird~only 1,337 original miles~1 owner~hardtop~chromes~clean carfax(US $27,900.00)
1955 ford thunderbird
Simply beautiful loaded 1955 ford thunderbird convertible p.s,p.b,p.w,drives new
Ford thunder bird super coupe 1995(US $3,495.00)
1997 ford thunderbird lx sport 4.6l v8 leather wrecked repairable clear title
Auto Services in Colorado
We are West Vail Shell ★★★★★
Vanatta Auto Electric ★★★★★
Tim`s Transmission & Auto Repair ★★★★★
South Colorado Springs Nissan ★★★★★
Santos Muffler Auto ★★★★★
RV Four Seasons ★★★★★
Auto blog
Next Ford Mustang to drop 400 pounds
Thu, 15 Aug 2013The Ford Mustang is already the lightest of the current crop of muscle cars, at around 3,600 pounds for a GT coupe with the six-speed manual transmission. That's almost 260 pounds less than a Chevrolet Camaro SS and about 450 pounds less than a Dodge Challenger R/T, which means the Mustang has a pretty big advantage when it comes to handling, braking, accelerating and economy. More good news: The next Mustang will be even lighter.
According to a report from Edmunds, the sixth-generation Mustang, which is set to debut at the 2014 North American International Auto Show, will shed an additional 400 pounds of body fat. That 11-percent weight reduction will be thanks to lightweight materials, with a particular focus on using stronger, but less material in construction. Aluminum will feature heavily, but Edmunds' inside source warns that there is "nothing terribly exotic" coming to the original pony car.
The other big news is that the new Mustang will be smaller overall. It's going to be 15-inches shorter than the 188.5-inch Mustang on sale today, while it'll also be 6.5 inches narrower. Shorter overhangs, both in the front and rear, are also good signs for those that want an agile Mustang.
Automotive Grade Linux will be the backbone of your connected car
Fri, Jan 6 2017Creating a backend for a secure, reliable, and expandable infotainment system is costly and time consuming. The Linux Foundation, a non-profit organization, has set out to promote and advance the Linux operating system in commercial products. Automotive Grade Linux, or AGL, is a group within the Foundation that seeks to apply a Linux backend to a number of automotive applications in a variety of vehicles from various suppliers and manufacturers. AGL's goal is to create a common, unifying framework that allows developers and manufacturers to easily implement applications across platforms. Currently, the focus is on infotainment systems, but AGL has plans for instrument clusters, heads-up displays, and eventually active safety software. At CES, a display from Panasonic showed a completely digital and customizable dashboard that allows information and apps to be moved from the gauge cluster to the infotainment screen and back, all through the use of gesture and touch controls. Although the organization has been around for five years, it's really only been in the past three that the group has been working hand in hand with automakers and suppliers. The first two OEMs to participate, Toyota and Jaguar Land Rover, have since been joined by Mazda, Suzuki, Ford, and, as of this week, Daimler. The latter is important as until now most of AGL's partner's have been based in Japan or the US. Other partners include suppliers Denso, Renesas, Continental, Qualcomm, and Intel. AGL want's to supply roughly 80 percent of the backend, allowing partners to then finish and refine the Linux system for each individual application. Think of how the Android operating system is refined and customized for individual smartphones from Samsung, LG, and Motorola. While the final product looks different, developers can have an application that will work across all AGL systems. Because it is open source, anyone can use and develop for AGL. You can even go onto the group's website and download a copy right now. There is also a software development kit available that helps facilitate app creation on the platform. Vehicle development cycles take roughly five years, so there currently are no cars that run an AGL backbone available for consumers. AGL Executive Director Dan Cauchy says products should be hitting the market later this year, with even more coming in 2018. Right now, the industry is relatively fragmented when it comes to infotainment and related systems.
Ford made three big mistakes in calculating MPG for 2013 C-Max Hybrid
Tue, Jun 17 2014It's been a rough time for the official fuel economy figures for the Ford C-Max Hybrid. When the car was released in 2012, Ford made a huge deal about how it would beat the Toyota Prius V, which was rated at 42 combined miles per gallon, 44 city and 40 highway. The Ford? 47 mpg across the board. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? Well, after hearing customer complaints and issuing a software update in mid-2013, then discovering a real problem with the numbers last fall and then making a big announcement last week that the fuel economy ratings of six different 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles would need to be lowered, the C-Max Hybrid has ended up at 40 combined, 42 city and 37 highway. In other words, the Prius trumps it, as daily drivers of those two vehicles have known for a long time. The changes will not only affect the window sticker, but also the effect that the C-Max Hybrid (and the five other Ford vehicles that had their fuel economy figures lowered last week) have on Ford's compliance with greenhouse gas and CAFE rules for model year 2013 and 2014. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? There are two technical answers to that question, which we've got below, as well as some context for how Ford's mistakes will play out in the bigger world of green vehicles. Let's start with Ford's second error, which is easy to do since we documented it in detail last year (the first, needing to do a software update, was also covered). The basic gist is that Ford used the general label rule (completely legally) to test the Fusion Hybrid and use those numbers to figure out how efficient the C-Max Hybrid is. That turned out to be a mistake, since the two vehicles are different enough that their numbers were not comparable, despite having the same engine, transmission and test weight, as the rules require. You can read more details here. Ford's Said Deep admitted that the TRLHP issue is completely separate from the general label error from last year. Now let's move on to last week's announcement. What's interesting is that the new recalculation of the MPG numbers – downward, of course – was caused by a completely separate issue, something called the Total Road Load Horsepower (TRLHP). Ford's Said Deep admitted to AutoblogGreen that the TRLHP issue had nothing to do with the general label error from last year.















