Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2011 Ford Taurus Sho Sedan 4-door 3.5l on 2040-cars

US $26,000.00
Year:2011 Mileage:32860 Color: Platinum White Tri-coat /
 Black
Location:

Fredericksburg, Virginia, United States

Fredericksburg, Virginia, United States
Advertising:
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:3.5L 3496CC 213Cu. In. V6 GAS DOHC Turbocharged
Transmission:Automatic
For Sale By:Private Seller
Body Type:Sedan
Fuel Type:GAS
VIN: 1FAHP2KT6BG148655 Year: 2011
Exterior Color: Platinum White Tri-coat
Make: Ford
Interior Color: Black
Model: Taurus
Warranty: Vehicle has an existing warranty
Trim: SHO Sedan 4-Door
Options: Sunroof, 4-Wheel Drive, Leather Seats, CD Player
Drive Type: AWD
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag, Side Airbags
Number of Cylinders: 6
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats, Driver's seat memory
Tuning: Unleashed Tuned
Exhaust: Livernois Downpipes
Number of Doors: 4
Water Methanol Injection: Unleashed Tuning Water Methanol Injection Kit
Mileage: 32,860
Thermostat: 170 degree thermostat
Sub Model: SHO
Condition: UsedA vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections.Seller Notes:"Some small scratches. Car is in great condition!"

2011 Ford Taurus SHO

-32860 miles
-Platinum White
-fully loaded minus active cruise control
-Livernois catted Downpipes
-Torrie's water methanol injection kit #7 nozzle
-Unleashed tuned with SCT handheld programmer
-Airraid CAI
-170 degree thermostat 
-H&R springs 
-Plastidipped black front grill (also have extra stock colored grill)

Car is in great condition looking to get $25,000 firm or $24,000 if I put the car back to stock. KBB says good trade-in is $23,000 and Edmunds says it's also about $23,000. NADA says the average trade-in is $24,550. Basically my wife would like to see us cut some expenses and getting rid of the SHO is one way to do that. There is nothing wrong with the car at all. It's very fast and has never been taken to the drag strip. The only thing the car will need soon is rear tires.

Auto Services in Virginia

Wade`s First Stop Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 324 Walnut Ave, Newbern
Phone: (540) 980-1168

Virginia Tire & Auto of Ashburn ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 43781 Parkhurst Plz, Ashburn
Phone: (703) 724-9000

The Body Works of VA INC ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: Somerville
Phone: (703) 777-5727

Superior Transmission Service Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission
Address: 306 Wallace Ln, Corbin
Phone: (540) 891-0106

Straight Up Automotive Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Automobile Air Conditioning Equipment-Service & Repair
Address: 701A Dale Ave, Monticello
Phone: (434) 984-0103

Steve`s Towing ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: Virginia-Beach
Phone: (757) 328-7531

Auto blog

Which is more fuel efficient, driving with a pickup's tailgate up or down?

Tue, 26 Aug 2014



Thanks to the smoke wand in the wind tunnel, you can actually see the difference in our video.
Should you drive with your pickup truck's tailgate up or down? It's an age-old controversy that's divided drivers for decades. Traditionalists will swear you should leave the tailgate down. Makes sense, right? It would seem to let the air flow more cleanly over the body and through the bed. But there's also a school of thought that argues trucks are designed to look and operate in a specific manner, and modern design techniques can help channel the airflow properly. So don't mess with all of that: Leave the tailgate up.

Ford EcoBoost V6 hits the dyno before hitting the track

Wed, 02 Oct 2013

Ford Racing just unveiled the Riley Daytona Prototype that will make its racing in the United SportsCar Racing Championship Rolex 24 at Daytona in January, and now it has released a video showing development of twin-turbo 3.5-liter EcoBoost V6 that powers the car. Using the same block and heads that can be found on a production Ford Taurus SHO, this new racecar benefits from the collaboration between Ford Racing and Ford powertrain engineers.
While we still don't know what kind of power this engine is putting out, it has definitely gotten a workout at Ford's 17G dyno. This area deep within Ford allows the automaker's racing program to work hand-in-hand with production engine programs, which can be a benefit to racing operations and production cars alike. Scroll down to hear a few people from Ford talk about the crosspollination between its racing and engine teams and watch the EcoBoost get red hot on the dyno.

Lexus tops JD Power Vehicle Dependability Study again, Buick bests Toyota

Wed, Feb 25 2015

It shouldn't surprise anyone, but Lexus has once again taken the top spot in JD Power's Vehicle Dependability Study. That'd be the Japanese luxury brand's fourth straight year at the top of table. The big news, though, is the rise of Buick. General Motor's near-premium brand beat out Toyota to take second place, with 110 problems per 100 vehicles compared to Toyota's 111 problems. Lexus owners only reported 89 problems per 100 vehicles. Besides Buick's three-position jump, Scion enjoyed a major improvement, jumping 13 positions from 2014. Ram and Mitsubishi made big gains, as well, moving up 11 and 10 positions, respectively. In terms of individual segments, GM and Toyota both excelled, taking home seven segment awards each. The study wasn't good news for all involved, though. A number of popular automakers finished below the industry average of 147 problems per 100 vehicles, including Subaru, (157PP100), Volkswagen (165PP100), Ford/Hyundai (188PP100 each) and Mini (193PP100). The biggest losers (by a tremendous margin, we might add) were Land Rover and Fiat, recording 258 and 273 problems per 100 vehicles. The next closest brand was Jeep, with 197PP100. While the Vehicle Dependability Study uses the same measurement system as the Initial Quality Survey, the two metrics analyze very different things. The VDS looks at problems experienced by original owners of model year 2012 vehicles over the past 12 months, while the oft-quoted IQS focuses on problems in the first 90 days of new-vehicle ownership. Like the IQS, though, the VDS has a rather broad definition of what a problem is. Because of that, a low score from JD Power is no guarantee of extreme unreliability, so much as just poor design. In this most recent study, the two most reported problems focused on Bluetooth connectivity and the voice-command systems. The former leaves plenty of room for user error due to poor design (particularly true of the Bluetooth systems on the low-scoring Fords, Volkswagens and Subarus), while the second is something JD Power has already confirmed as being universally terrible. That makes means that while these studies are important, they shouldn't be taken as gospel when it comes to automotive reliability. News Source: JD PowerImage Credit: Copyright 2015 Jeremy Korzeniewski / AOL Buick Fiat Ford GM Hyundai Jeep Land Rover Lexus MINI Mitsubishi RAM Scion Subaru Toyota Volkswagen Auto Repair Ownership study