Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2005 Ford Ranger on 2040-cars

US $1,735.00
Year:2005 Mileage:52445 Color: Brown /
 Tan
Location:

Kent, Washington, United States

Kent, Washington, United States
Vehicle Title:Clean
For Sale By:Dealer
Seller Notes: “Please see full equipment details in Description, including photos and video demonstration.”
Year: 2005
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1FTYR10U95PA91060
Mileage: 52445
Coverage Provided: bidadoo 100% Guarantee
Documentation & Handling Fee: $295.20
Model: Ranger
Drive Type: 2WD
Make: Ford
Exterior Color: Brown
Interior Color: Tan
Condition: UsedA vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. See all condition definitions

Auto Services in Washington

Westover Auto Rebuild ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Wheels-Aligning & Balancing
Address: 23765 SE 264th St, Black-Diamond
Phone: (425) 358-2472

vetter automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Automobile Diagnostic Service
Address: 4135 sw hunter lane, Wauna
Phone: (360) 876-5500

Twin City Collision ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Truck Body Repair & Painting
Address: 8530A Cedarhome Dr, Stanwood
Phone: (360) 629-5152

Tru Line Frame & Wheel ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Wheel Alignment-Frame & Axle Servicing-Automotive, Brake Repair
Address: 312 Boren Ave S, Retsil
Phone: (206) 325-3340

Troll Motors ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 1115 S Elizabeth St, Retsil
Phone: (206) 763-7222

Toby`s Battery & Autoelectric ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Battery Storage
Address: 3003 N Crestline St, Greenacres
Phone: (509) 252-0617

Auto blog

Ford shutters Genk assembly plant in Belgium

Tue, Dec 23 2014

Ford has become the latest automaker to close one of its European assembly plants. The facility in question is located in the Belgian city of Genk and has been in operation since the early '60s when it started building the Taunus, Ford's first mass-produced, front-drive model. As part of the plan first announced over two years ago, the Genk Body & Assembly Plant is now closing its doors after half a century in the business and over fourteen million vehicles built. Although the plant itself employed some 5,000 workers, once you take into account the suppliers built up around the plant, the overall impact on employment in the area edges closer to 12,000. Genk Body & Assembly had until recently been tasked with producing the Mondeo sedan (which in its current iteration we know as the Fusion) as well as the S-Max and Galaxy minivans. Production of the Mondeo shifted in 2013 to the company's plant in Valencia, Spain, which also handles the Kuga crossover and Transit Connect cargo van, and will soon take over the minivans from Genk as well. The move follows a similar decision undertaken by General Motors to close the Opelwerk plant in Bochum, Germany. It also reflects a scaling down of automobile production in Belgium specifically: although Audi still manufacturers in Brussels and and Volvo in Ghent, Opel closed its plant in Antwerp in 2000 and Renault ceased production in Vilvoorde back in '97. However Ford still maintains its famous proving ground half an hour to the north in Lommel, Belgium. News Source: AutovisieImage Credit: Kristof Van Accom / AFP / Getty Plants/Manufacturing Ford plant ford s-max ford galaxy

2015 Ford Mustang fuel economy ratings leaked

Thu, 21 Aug 2014

Thinking about buying a new Mustang, but want to know what kind of fuel economy it'll get? Well we have our first indication as the pony-car enthusiasts over at Mustang6G.com have gotten a hold of the Monroney window stickers for a few of the new 2015 Mustang models.
Although the V8 model is not among them, we can now see how the EPA has rated those models with a half dozen pistons or less. The Mustang EcoBoost with the turbo four and a manual transmission has been rated at 22 miles per gallon in the city and 31 on the highway. The V6 manual gets 17 city and 28 highway, while the V6 automatic squeezes out a bit more in the city at 19 mpg but carries the same 28 highway rating.
By way of comparison, the latest Chevy Camaro with the V6 and a stick shift gets the same 17/28 EPA rating as a similarly equipped new 'Stang, and the V6 automatic Camaro gets 18/27 (slightly behind the Ford, but if you opt for the Camaro 2LS with its V6, automatic and 2.92 rear axle ratio, you'll be looking at 19 and 30).

Consumer Reports: Ford Fusion fun but flawed; Mitsubishi i-MiEV slow, chintzy [w/videos]

Wed, 23 Jan 2013

Waiting for a Ford compliment from Consumer Reports these days is like waiting for a low-cost new product from Apple. So we weren't really expecting a glowing review of the 2013 Ford Fusion when CR got its hands on the car. The institute's crew bought three different versions of the Fusion (Hybrid, 1.6-liter EcoBoost and a Titanium with the 2.0-liter EcoBoost) to put through its barrage of tests, and while we aren't too surprised by some of the findings, they're still interesting nonetheless.
CR praises the Fusion for its "eye-catching" design and says that the sportier Titanium trim level is the best-handling midsize sedan they've ever tested, but that's about where the good news ends for Ford. The Fusion Hybrid also posted the best-ever fuel economy CR has recorded in a midsize sedan, but the only problem is that their number was 39 miles per gallon combined - far less than Ford's 47 mpg rating for city, highway and combined. As expected, CR also dinged the Fusion for its MyFord Touch, but some of the other gripes about the car include a cramped cabin and poor fit and finish.
Other Ford products tested this time around include the Focus Electric and C-Max Hybrid. Like the Fusion, CR's observed fuel economy of 37 mpg for the C-Max fell well short of Ford's advertised 47-mpg rating, and both cars were criticized for the use of MyFord Touch. CR notes that the Focus Electric's interior is also cramped, with the battery pack taking up a lot of cargo space.