2001 Ford Ranger 4x4 4.0 6 Cyl 3"lift 33's, 4 Door! Nice Truck! No Reserve!!! on 2040-cars
|
2001 Ford Ranger, 4 functional doors, 4x4, 4.0 6 cyl, 5 speed manual, white with 116,200 miles... mostly highway.
The biggest engine they put in the
ranger. Plenty of power. Truck was treated with respect. I have owned
the truck from 54,000 miles and always let it warm up before driving. Has a magnaflow muffler that sounds perfectly
throaty like a v8. Airaid throttle body
spacer, Summit Racing Electric Fan, diamond plate bedside covers, Diamondplate
tailgate cover, has plastic bedliner with tiedown hooks installed, real
stainless steel bug deflector, American racing 15in rims on 33x12.5 Goodyear
Wrangler Duratracs with approx 90% treadlife left. Also has hella 1000 pencil beams hidden
behind front billet grill.
Professionally painted front valance, fender flares, and visor. Truck has a 3inch body lift. No Rust!
Alpine type S speakers in two front
doors with alpine head unit 9847 plays MP3's...1 10" sub in back seat. Carbon fiber dash kit, Truck has a topper to
go with it with 33x12.5 spare tire mounted on top and 4 flood lights. The pass side tailight is broken although all the lights are still working on it. Truck is being Sold As Is. This truck has run perfect for years so I can almost gaurantee no buyers' remorse. |
Ford Ranger for Sale
2011 xl used 2.3l i4 16v manual rwd(US $15,980.00)
Florida 00 ranger extnd cab pick up truck clean carfax 3.0 v6 5-spd no reserve
2007 ford ranger xl standard cab 4 cyl automatic one owner low reserve buy me(US $4,795.00)
2009 ford ranger one owner 79k gas saver ready to work runs great sporty !!
1997 ford ranger xlt super clean low miles
2003 ford ranger edge extended cab/stepside pickup 2-door 3.0l flex fuel
Auto blog
What's in a trademark? Sometimes, the next iconic car name
Thu, 07 Aug 2014
The United States Patent and Trademark Office is a treasure trove for auto enthusiasts, especially those who double as conspiracy theorists.
Why has Toyota applied to trademark "Supra," the name of one of its legendary sports cars, even though it hasn't sold one in the United States in 16 years? Why would General Motors continue to register "Chevelle" long after one of the most famous American muscle cars hit the end of the road? And what could Chrysler possibly do with the rights to "313," the area code for Detroit?
Ford announces four recalls, 1.4M vehicles affected
Thu, 29 May 2014Ford is taking a bit of the spotlight away from General Motors, announcing a major group of recall campaigns, covering a total of 1.4 million vehicles built between 2006 and 2013.
Let's start with the big one, which covers the Ford Escape, Mercury Mariner and, according to The Detroit News, Ford-built Mazda Tribute CUVs. 915,216 vehicles are covered, all of which were built in model years 2008 to 2011. 736,000 vehicles are in the US, while Canada then Mexico make up the vast majority of the remainder. The problem is due to an issue with the torque sensor in the steering column, which could lead to sudden power steering failure. Manual steering would still be available, though.
"Dealers will perform one of three service fixes, depending upon what diagnostic codes are shown when the vehicle is taken to the dealer," Ford spokeswoman Kelli Felker wrote to Autoblog in an email. "They will either update software for the power steering control module and the instrument cluster module; replace the torque sensor; or replace the steering column, which includes upgraded power steering control module software."
Ford made three big mistakes in calculating MPG for 2013 C-Max Hybrid
Tue, Jun 17 2014It's been a rough time for the official fuel economy figures for the Ford C-Max Hybrid. When the car was released in 2012, Ford made a huge deal about how it would beat the Toyota Prius V, which was rated at 42 combined miles per gallon, 44 city and 40 highway. The Ford? 47 mpg across the board. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? Well, after hearing customer complaints and issuing a software update in mid-2013, then discovering a real problem with the numbers last fall and then making a big announcement last week that the fuel economy ratings of six different 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles would need to be lowered, the C-Max Hybrid has ended up at 40 combined, 42 city and 37 highway. In other words, the Prius trumps it, as daily drivers of those two vehicles have known for a long time. The changes will not only affect the window sticker, but also the effect that the C-Max Hybrid (and the five other Ford vehicles that had their fuel economy figures lowered last week) have on Ford's compliance with greenhouse gas and CAFE rules for model year 2013 and 2014. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? There are two technical answers to that question, which we've got below, as well as some context for how Ford's mistakes will play out in the bigger world of green vehicles. Let's start with Ford's second error, which is easy to do since we documented it in detail last year (the first, needing to do a software update, was also covered). The basic gist is that Ford used the general label rule (completely legally) to test the Fusion Hybrid and use those numbers to figure out how efficient the C-Max Hybrid is. That turned out to be a mistake, since the two vehicles are different enough that their numbers were not comparable, despite having the same engine, transmission and test weight, as the rules require. You can read more details here. Ford's Said Deep admitted that the TRLHP issue is completely separate from the general label error from last year. Now let's move on to last week's announcement. What's interesting is that the new recalculation of the MPG numbers – downward, of course – was caused by a completely separate issue, something called the Total Road Load Horsepower (TRLHP). Ford's Said Deep admitted to AutoblogGreen that the TRLHP issue had nothing to do with the general label error from last year.