Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1987 Ford Ranger on 2040-cars

Year:1987 Mileage:293000
Location:

Kingsville, Ohio, United States

Kingsville, Ohio, United States
Transmission:Manual
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:2.9 V6
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Condition:
Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ...
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number)
: 1FTCR11T1HUB29127
Year: 1987
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Regular Cab
Trim: XLT
Options: Sunroof, Cassette Player
Drive Type: 5 speed 4WD
Mileage: 293,000
Number of Cylinders: 6
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty

Paring down the fleet. Offering this rough but reliable 1987 Ford Ranger XLT, 2.9 V6, 5 speed, 4 wheel drive and a reciever type hitch. Riding on 4 excellent 235 - 75 X 15 BFG All Terrain tires ($450), 4 used BFG AT tires matching the ones on it with one of them mounted on matching rim for the spare. Parts replaced while I owned it include rebuilt transmission with complete clutch assembly replaced at the same time, gas tank and sender/fuel pump assembly, all brakes shoes and pads including front rotors, radiator and water pump, rebuilt rear axle with new Ford limited slip differential, and timing chain and gears. It has rust issues with the worst being the firewall around the pedal assembly. I have it braced with angle iron to make it driveable. Extra parts that will go with the truck include a transmission and a transmission/transfer case of unknown condition, a pair of used locking hubs, the old gas tank, and a parts truck.

Local pickup preferred, we may be able to work out delivery depending on distance. Deposit will be forfeit if item is not picked up wihin 15 days of auction close unless otherwise agreed.

Ford Ranger for Sale

Auto Services in Ohio

Zig`s Auto Service Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 7340 N Ridge Rd, Thompson
Phone: (866) 595-6470

World Auto Network ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers
Address: 15225 Waterloo Rd, Warrensville-Heights
Phone: (216) 692-1311

Woda Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers
Address: 18987 State Route 347, Mingo
Phone: (937) 325-8388

Wholesale Tire Co ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers, Automobile Accessories
Address: 730 E Market St, Parkman
Phone: (330) 399-6487

Westway Body Shop ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Towing
Address: 2888 Fisher Rd, Galena
Phone: (614) 274-9311

Toth Buick GMC Trucks ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 3300 S Arlington Rd, Litchfield
Phone: (330) 239-8469

Auto blog

Ford GT to be revived, Le Mans battle upcoming

Sun, 05 Oct 2014

Ford dominated the 24 Hours of Le Mans from 1966 to 1969, scoring four consecutive wins. Wouldn't it be great if the Blue Oval could go back to France for the 50th anniversary of that performance and show it can still compete in international endurance racing? Actually, the latest rumors indicate that could be exactly the case, and the car taking that checkered flag could be another revival of the Ford GT.
As the rumblings go, Ford wants to use a new supercar to take another crack at Le Mans, after considering some other possible alternatives. Substantiating these musings are reports that a Blue Oval rep was reportedly on hand for a recent meeting about 2016 GTE-Class rules, according to Road and Track. That would put the new GT in the same racing class as the Corvette, Ferrari 458 Italia, Porsche 911 and others.
It's not all about racing, though. If you win on Sunday, you want something to be able to sell on Monday. The revived GT is reportedly still a mid-engine supercar, but the exact engine is unclear. It's possible that it could even be shown or announced at the Detroit auto show in January, according to Motor Trend.

Ringbrothers shows off Coyote-powered 1968 Mercury Cougar

Thu, Feb 25 2021

We'll openly admit that not every SEMA build is our cup of tea. But this? A tastefully resto-modded 1968 Mercury Cougar with a 460-horsepower Ford Mustang V8? Yeah, this is right in our wheelhouse. Sadly, there was no in-pwerson SEMA show in 2020, so we missed out on gems like this one. SEMA or no SEMA, the aftermarket carries on, and co-owners Jim and Mike Ring of Ringbrothers (get it?) saw no reason to let their time and effort go to waste.  When they're not building wild customs (see: 1,100-horsepower 1972 AMC Javelin AMX) or more subtle showcases (such as this Cougar or their 1971 K5 Chevy Blazer build from 2018), the folks at Ringbrothers crank out factory reproduction parts, whether for old-fashioned restoration or modification purposes. While '60s muscle cars are recurring build subjects for the two, the Cougar was the first of its kind they tackled.  Keeping it in the family, Ringbrothers sourced a Ford 5.0-liter "Coyote" V8 and a 10-Speed Automatic (lifted from an F-150 Raptor, incidentally) for the build. They didn't stop with the driveline, of course. The suspension was overhauled with a little help from DSE and a set of HRE Series C1 C103 Forged 3-Piece wheels were thrown over upgraded brakes.  "We put our heart into each car we build, and this Cougar is no exception," Jim said. "The finished product is mild and classy, yet any enthusiast instantly knows it's not stock. I imagine this is what Mercury designers would have come up with if they were building the Cougar today." "While we couldn't bring the car to the SEMA Show, we hope it can be shown to the public soon," Mike said. "We had never done a Cougar before, so this was a fun build. I love working with new shapes and coming up with new ideas." There's plenty to appreciate about this Cougar apart from the mechanicals, too. The finish is Augusta Green Metallic (courtesy of BASF), which was a factory color in 1968. You may know it by another name: Highland Green. There are a few custom exterior touches, but they're quite subtle and styled to be period-correct. The interior was also restored and updated, and it's where you'll find the only thing we're not fond of: that big, fat truck shifter. Gearbox choices notwithstanding, it's a bit of an eyesore. But considering how gorgeous the rest is, we'll give it a pass.  Related Video:

BMW, Hyundai score big in JD Power's first Tech Experience Index

Mon, Oct 10 2016

While automakers are quick to brag about winning a JD Power Initial Quality Study award, the reality, as we've pointed out before, is that these ratings are somewhat misleading, since IQS doesn't necessarily distinguish genuine quality issues. JD Power's new Tech Experience Index aims to solve that problem. The new metric takes the same 90-day approach as IQS but focuses exclusively on technology – collision protection, comfort and convenience, driving assistance, entertainment and connectivity, navigation, and smartphone mirroring. It splits the industry up into just seven segments, based loosely on size, which is why the Chevrolet Camaro is in the same division (mid-size) as Kia Sorento and the Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class is in the same segment as the Hyundai Genesis (mid-size premium). It makes for some screwy bedfellows, to be sure. Still, splitting tech experience away from initial quality should allow customers to make more informed and intelligent decisions when buying new vehicles. In the inaugural study, respondents listed BMW and Hyundai as the big winners, with two segment awards – the 2 Series for small premium and the 4 Series for compact premium, and the Genesis for mid-size premium and Tucson for small segment. The Chevrolet Camaro (midsize), Kia Forte (compact), and Nissan Maxima (large) scored individual wins. Ford also had a surprising hit with the Lincoln MKC, which ranked third in the compact premium segment behind the 4 Series and Lexus IS. This is a coup for the Blue Oval, whose woeful MyFord Touch systems made the brand a victim of the IQS' flaws in the early 2010s. But Ford and other automakers might not want to celebrate just yet. According to JD Power, there's still a lot of room for improvement – navigation systems were the lowest-rated piece of tech in the study. Instead, customers repeatedly saluted collision-avoidance and safety systems, giving the category the best marks of the study and listing blind-spot monitoring and backup cameras as two must-have features – 96 percent of respondents said they wanted those two systems in their next vehicle. But this isn't really a surprise. Implementation of safety systems from brand to brand is similar, and they don't require any input from users, unlike navigation and infotainment systems which are frustratingly deep.