** Price Reduced***1987 Ford Ranger Stx Extended Cab Pickup 2-door 2.9l on 2040-cars
Wilmington, Delaware, United States
For Sale By:Private Seller
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Extended Cab Pickup
Engine:2.9L V-6
Vehicle Title:Clear
Exterior Color: Brown
Interior Color: Tan
Year: 1987
Number of Cylinders: 6
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger
Trim: 2-door
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Drive Type: RWD
Up for sale is a 1987 Ford Ranger. I bought this truck recently to use as a work vehicle, unfortunately I got about 15 miles down the road and it stalls out, I had to jump it to get it started but even with a jump it is very hard to start ( Why I believe it needs a starter ) I work too much to mess with it so this could be an easy fix for someone mechanical.. When the truck drove it had plenty of power and not even a shimmy at 60 MPH. The previous owner just drove this truck form Delaware to New York and back with the only issue being a blown tire so the truck now has 2 new tires on the rear and the old rear tire saved as a full size spare. for an 87 the interior is in great shape , cloth seats with no rips, dash has sun spots but there are no cracks as can be seen in the photos. I'm just hoping to break even on this truck so thanks for looking and good luck.
Ford Ranger for Sale
Edge truck 3.0l cd 4 speakers am/fm radio power steering abs brakes tachometer(US $5,587.00)
2008 ford ranger sport extended cab pickup 2-door 3.0l
Ford ranger xlt pickup 1994
2006 ford ranger xl standard cab pickup 2-door 2.3l
1993 ford ranger xlt with camper shell - 3.0 liter v6 manual transmission(US $2,200.00)
1984 ford ranger 4wd(US $2,500.00)
Auto Services in Delaware
Weathers Motors ★★★★★
SUNOCO ★★★★★
Scott Carter Enterprise ★★★★★
Piazza Acura of West Chester ★★★★★
Newark Toyota World ★★★★★
D & C Auto Sales ★★★★★
Auto blog
1914 Ford Model T at Historic Greenfield Village | AutoblogVR
Tue, Sep 6 2016We drive all of the newest and most sophisticated cars, but a 102-year-old Ford is one of our recent favorites. Senior Editor Alex Kierstein headed to historic Greenfield Village in Dearborn, MI, to learn to drive a Model T in the latest AutoblogVR segment. Kierstein picks up the Model T fairly quickly, despite its controls. Though they were designed more than a century ago to be simple and easy to use, driving a Model T is complicated and counter-intuitive to the modern motorist. But by the end of his lesson, Kierstein has it all figured out and is enjoying himself. In our other new segment, Detroit Manufacturing, Senior Editor Greg Migliore showcases the city''s industrial might. He tours a modern Fiat Chrysler factory that churns out Dodge Durangos and Jeep Grand Cherokees and then wanders the ruins of the mythical Packard Plant. There's also some tasty and unexpected twists in this VR episode. Each week, new episodes will launch on the AutoblogVR App. We'll preview them here on Autoblog, but for the full immersive experience, head over to the app, which you can download for free from the App store and Google Play. Be sure to try it with a cardboard viewer, too! Ford Jeep Automotive History Driving Classics Videos VR Original Video Detroit ford model t tour 360video
Malcolm Gladwell reflects on engineering, recalls, and compromise
Thu, Apr 30 2015Journalist Malcolm Gladwell has made a career taking on big, complicated topics and humanizing them to make the unwieldy understandable. He has already done this in bestsellers like The Tipping Point and Outliers, and now he has brought the same approach to automotive recalls in a long piece for The New Yorker. The article titled The Engineer's Lament is framed around an interview with the former head of Ford's recall office about the famous Ford Pinto campaign where the position of the compact's fuel tank could cause it to explode in rear-end collisions. Plus, there are detours into Toyota's unintended acceleration cases and the General Motors ignition switch problem. While all the history is illuminating, the heart of the story comes from an examination at the thought process of engineers, and how their thinking differs from other professions. Gladwell comes off as sympathetic to auto engineers in this piece. While he admits that they often approach problems in a sterile way, the writer doesn't try point that out as a failing. It's merely a fact to be understood. The story itself is quite lengthy, but well worth a read if you have the time for an insiders view into how these recalls are assessed on the inside.
Ford, Volvo, Google, Uber and Lyft form self-driving alliance
Tue, Apr 26 2016Five companies arguably leading the worldwide effort to develop autonomous cars said Tuesday they're forming an organization to lobby the federal government to better prepare America's roads for self-driving technology. The founding members include some of the biggest companies in the automotive, autonomous, and ride-sharing realms – Ford, Google, Lyft, Uber and Volvo. Operating as the "Self-Driving Coalition for Safer Streets," they aim to work with lawmakers and regulators to clarify a disparate set of rules and regulations at both the state and federal levels that could hinder the deployment of autonomous cars. "The U.S. risks losing its leading position due to the lack of federal guidelines for the testing and certification of autonomous vehicles." – Hakan Samuelsson David Strickland, a former administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration who issued the first set of autonomous-related policies in that role (pictured below), will serve as the group's counsel and spokesperson. "The best path for this innovation is to have one clear set of federal standards, and the Coalition will work with policymakers to find the right solutions that will facilitate the deployment of self-driving vehicles," he said in a written statement. In January, Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx said his department would accelerate efforts to craft such federal standards. Those efforts include holding two public hearings on standards, the second of which is scheduled to be held Wednesday in Palo Alto, California. Foxx signaled the intent to deliver them by June. Google has been leading the efforts to ensure such standards are national in scope, warning their cars could run afoul of state-specific laws should they cross state borders or if standards varies between the federal efforts and regional ones. The complexity of such efforts was underscored recently, when NHTSA agreed that Google's software could be considered the driver of a vehicle for the purpose of meeting federal motor vehicle standards, an interpretation that would conflict with preliminary California rules that mandate a licensed driver operate a self-driving car that comes equipped with human controls like a steering wheel and brakes. At South By Southwest last month, Jennifer Haroon, Google's self-driving car business leader, said the company couldn't accomplish its goals under those regulations.







