1963 Ford Econoline Pickup on 2040-cars
Glendale, Arizona, United States
Health
issues force sale of this 1963 Ford Econoline pickup truck. Original 170 ci; 6
cylinder, 3 speed on the column. It has
5 lug 14” rims. It has an alternator in
place of the generator, and solid lifters.
It has been started regularly, but not driven since I had surgery. I have a core motor and transmission that will be
included – a 1970 Maverick 200 ci 6 cylinder and automatic transmission, and a
Ford automatic column out of a van that I was going to put in it. I also have NOS factory stock mirrors and a
NOS transmission mount for the 3 speed transmission, along with the original
oil-bath air cleaner. I replaced the
side and rear glass with factory tinted glass and the windshield and rear
window have new rubber gaskets. As you
can see from the pictures, the clear coat is flaking. This is a solid truck and will be a good
project for someone. I hate to have to
sell it, but I just can’t work on it anymore.
Thanks for looking. If you have any questions, please ask. |
Ford Other Pickups for Sale
- 1949 ford f 3 express(US $8,000.00)
- 1952 mercury m-1 truck very rare ! deluxe cab 3sp/overdrive must see!!
- 1938 ford flatbed truck 396 big block and 4 speed trans
- Extreme truck f650 pickup! diesel, cummins, allison, custom(US $65,000.00)
- 1953 ford truck , v8 239 cid (flathead) no reserve!!!
- 2003 ford f-750 super duty & 1986 drake 5 car trailer/auto carrier/hauler(US $32,000.00)
Auto Services in Arizona
Wades Discount Muffler, Brakes & Catalytic Converters ★★★★★
Unique Auto Repair ★★★★★
Transmission Plus ★★★★★
Super Discount Transmissions ★★★★★
Suntec Auto Glass & Tinting ★★★★★
Sluder`s Garage ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford using robot drivers to test durability [w/video]
Sun, 16 Jun 2013In testing the durability of its upcoming fullsize Transit vans, Ford has begun using autonomous robotic technology to pilot vehicles through the punishing courses of its Michigan Proving Grounds test facility. The autonomous tech allows Ford to run more durability tests in a single day than it could with human drivers, as well as create even more challenging tests that wouldn't be safe to run with a human behind the wheel.
The technology being used was developed by Utah-based Autonomous Solutions, and isn't quite like the totally autonomous vehicles being developed by companies like Google and Audi for use out in the real world. Rather, Ford's autonomous test vehicles follow a pre-programmed course and their position is tracked via GPS and cameras that are being monitored from a central control room. Though the route is predetermined, the robotic control module operates the steering, acceleration and braking to keep the vehicle on course as it drives over broken concrete, cobblestones, metal grates, rough gravel, mud pits and oversize speed bumps.
Scroll down to watch the robotic drivers in action, though be warned that you're headed for disappointment if you expect to see a Centurion behind the wheel (nerd alert!). The setup looks more like a Mythbusters experiment than a scene from Battlestar Galactica.
Ring Brothers shows 1965-66 Mustang fastback carbon fiber body
Thu, 07 Nov 2013We covered one of Ring Brothers' more extreme SEMA builds yesterday, the De Tomaso Pantera-based ADRNLN, but if that well-executed but over-the-top Italian-American exotic is too much for you, then perhaps this Ring Brothers 1965 Ford Mustang fastback with a carbon-fiber body suits your tastes better.
What the performance-parts manufacturer is showcasing with the Mustang is the carbon-fiber body itself, which is fashioned around the 1965-66 fastback. It can be bought from the company and bonded to the skin and unibody as a do-it-yourself project, or you can take your Mustang to Ring Brothers and have the body installed there. The fenders, doors and quarter panels are two-inches wider than stock, and Ring Brothers offers a custom widebody chassis to those who want the complete package.
The show car looks sharp in person lowered on HRE wheels, and we appreciate the bare front end so we can see the supercharged V8 and front coilover suspension, though the details on those performance upgrades are slim. Also note the custom independent rear suspension setup at the rear.
Ford fights back against patent trolls
Fri, Feb 13 2015Some people are just awful. Some organizations are just as awful. And when those people join those organizations, we get stories like this one, where Ford has spent the past several years combatting so-called patent trolls. According to Automotive News, these malicious organizations have filed over a dozen lawsuits against the company since 2012. They work by purchasing patents, only to later accuse companies of misusing intellectual property, despite the fact that the so-called patent assertion companies never actually, you know, do anything with said intellectual property. AN reports that both Hyundai and Toyota have been victimized by these companies, with the former forced to pay $11.5 million to a company called Clear With Computers. Toyota, meanwhile, settled with Paice LLC, over its hybrid tech. The world's largest automaker agreed to pay $5 million, on top of $98 for every hybrid it sold (if the terms of the deal included each of the roughly 1.5 million hybrids Toyota sold since 2000, the company would have owed $147 million). Including the previous couple of examples, AN reports 107 suits were filed against automakers last year alone. But Ford is taking action to prevent further troubles... kind of. The company has signed on with a firm called RPX, in what sounds strangely like a protection racket. Automakers like Ford pay RPX around $1.5 million each year for access to its catalog of patents, which it spent nearly $1 billion building. "We take the protection and licensing of patented innovations very seriously," Ford told AN via email. "And as many smart businesses are doing, we are taking proactive steps to protect against those seeking patent infringement litigation." What are your thoughts on this? Should this patent business be better managed? Is it reasonable that companies purchase patents only to file suit against the companies that build actual products? Have your say in Comments.