Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

Two 1984 20th Anniversary Mustangs Selling As A Pair. on 2040-cars

Year:1984 Mileage:52887 Color: White /
 Red
Location:

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Transmission:Manual
Body Type:Hatchback
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:5.0 HO
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: 1FABP28M5EF180058 Year: 1984
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Ford
Model: Mustang
Trim: 20TH Anniversary GT350 Hatchback
Power Options: Power Locks, Power Windows
Drive Type: 5-Speed Transmission
Mileage: 52,887
Sub Model: GT 350
Disability Equipped: No
Exterior Color: White
Number of Doors: 3
Interior Color: Red
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

Two 1984 GT350 both running with 5.0 HO motors and 5 Speed manual transmissions. Selling as a pair. Cars need some work and would make a great restoration project or even great drag cars. First mustang has a VIN# of 1FABP28M5EF180058 and reads 52887 miles on the dash(Speedometer works!). The Second Mustang has the VIN# of 1FABP28MXEF181156 and reads 21246 on the dash(speedometer works!). I have clear titles for both cars. Again I am selling these as a Pair.

Auto Services in Indiana

Xtreme Precision ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories
Address: 6051 E State Road 144, Mooresville
Phone: (317) 831-4800

Whetsel`s Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 43 Hough St, Finly
Phone: (317) 462-9461

USA Auto Mart ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 1701 English Ave, Mc-Cordsville
Phone: (317) 634-2670

Tony Kinser Body Shop ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Dent Removal
Address: 2404 N Smith Pike, Bean-Blossom
Phone: (812) 558-0757

Tire Barn Warehouse ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Wheels-Aligning & Balancing
Address: 10103 E Washington St, Wanamaker
Phone: (317) 898-8473

The Tire Store ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Brake Repair
Address: 1905 E State Road 14, Tippecanoe
Phone: (574) 224-8473

Auto blog

Chevy Silverado frame twist test a marketing victory versus Ford

Thu, 16 Oct 2014

The pickup market is so competitive that all three major American makers are constantly trying to find a way to prove their product is the best. The new 2015 Ford F-150 is grabbing headlines at the moment by winning awards and posting segment best numbers. But in a new video, Chevrolet is taking aim squarely at the 2015 F-250 Super Duty in a battle of heavy-duty truck supremacy against the 2015 Chevy Silverado 2500HD... well, in a single metric anyway.
The big numbers from pickups often come down to payload, towing rating and fuel economy, but for this test, Chevy and Howie Long are challenging the torsional rigidity of the trucks' frames, specifically which one flexes less. Long plays the everyman here having the Chevy engineer explain what's going on in the tests. Unsurprisingly for a video on Chevy's official YouTube page, the 2500HD wins out by a good margin. The company also reports that similar results as shown here have been certified in third-party testing.
Check out the video to see the full test. While this might seem like a marketing win for Chevy, Ford isn't immune to it, either. In 2009, the Blue Oval uploaded a similar video comparing the flex under 225 pounds of weight from the bare frames of the F-150, Chevy Silverado, Dodge Ram (as it was still called at the time) and the Toyota Tundra. The results fell in the Blue Oval's favor, as you can see here.

Lexus tops JD Power Vehicle Dependability Study again, Buick bests Toyota

Wed, Feb 25 2015

It shouldn't surprise anyone, but Lexus has once again taken the top spot in JD Power's Vehicle Dependability Study. That'd be the Japanese luxury brand's fourth straight year at the top of table. The big news, though, is the rise of Buick. General Motor's near-premium brand beat out Toyota to take second place, with 110 problems per 100 vehicles compared to Toyota's 111 problems. Lexus owners only reported 89 problems per 100 vehicles. Besides Buick's three-position jump, Scion enjoyed a major improvement, jumping 13 positions from 2014. Ram and Mitsubishi made big gains, as well, moving up 11 and 10 positions, respectively. In terms of individual segments, GM and Toyota both excelled, taking home seven segment awards each. The study wasn't good news for all involved, though. A number of popular automakers finished below the industry average of 147 problems per 100 vehicles, including Subaru, (157PP100), Volkswagen (165PP100), Ford/Hyundai (188PP100 each) and Mini (193PP100). The biggest losers (by a tremendous margin, we might add) were Land Rover and Fiat, recording 258 and 273 problems per 100 vehicles. The next closest brand was Jeep, with 197PP100. While the Vehicle Dependability Study uses the same measurement system as the Initial Quality Survey, the two metrics analyze very different things. The VDS looks at problems experienced by original owners of model year 2012 vehicles over the past 12 months, while the oft-quoted IQS focuses on problems in the first 90 days of new-vehicle ownership. Like the IQS, though, the VDS has a rather broad definition of what a problem is. Because of that, a low score from JD Power is no guarantee of extreme unreliability, so much as just poor design. In this most recent study, the two most reported problems focused on Bluetooth connectivity and the voice-command systems. The former leaves plenty of room for user error due to poor design (particularly true of the Bluetooth systems on the low-scoring Fords, Volkswagens and Subarus), while the second is something JD Power has already confirmed as being universally terrible. That makes means that while these studies are important, they shouldn't be taken as gospel when it comes to automotive reliability. News Source: JD PowerImage Credit: Copyright 2015 Jeremy Korzeniewski / AOL Buick Fiat Ford GM Hyundai Jeep Land Rover Lexus MINI Mitsubishi RAM Scion Subaru Toyota Volkswagen Auto Repair Ownership study

Ford paying $750 million just to close plant in Belgium

Thu, 21 Mar 2013

According to a report from Reuters, Ford is shelling out $750 million in a severance deal that will see the automaker close its facility in Genk, Belgium. The automaker reached this deal with the 4,000 hourly workers employed at the plant last week, which means the company will pay out an average of $187,500 per worker.
Ford is still negotiating with the 300 salaried workers at the factory, which currently produces the Mondeo sedan. All told, Ford expects to lose around $2 billion in Europe thanks in no small part to the region's ongoing economic downturn, and two more plants are scheduled to be shut down in Europe this year. The company will log its $750 million payout under "special items" for this quarter.
As you may recall, Ford took a similar path in the US back in 2009 when the domestic market took a spill. Back then, the company shelled out around $50,000 per employee with at least one year of experience, plus either $25,000 toward a new car or an extra cash payment of $20,000. It would seem the cost of closing plants in Belgium is a much harder pill to swallow than in the States...