Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

Ford Mustang Boss 302 on 2040-cars

US $14,000.00
Year:2012 Mileage:6799 Color: Orange
Location:

Bakersfield, California, United States

Bakersfield, California, United States

Garage-kept, covered, cherished and hardly driven 2012 Boss 302. Only 6799 miles, this competition orange beauty has been lovingly cared for. Looks and runs just like it did off the showroom floor. Recaro seat pkg. with embroidered Boss 302 logos, Alcantara suede steering wheel, painted side mirrors, Brembo front brakes, manual adjustable suspension, black decklid spoiler, traction & launch control and more — all the Boss 302 goodies. Oil has been changed every 3K miles, always with Ford Racing Synthetic as recommended by the factory. All records of this kept. Brand new Kumho tires all around. Only mod is a rear-section Borla ATAK exhaust, which preserves the factory side exits and sounds like a dream.

Auto Services in California

Zoll Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 247 California Dr, Foster-City
Phone: (650) 595-2777

Zeller`s Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 1732 Yajome St, Vallejo
Phone: (707) 252-6567

Your Choice Car ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 5650 Eastgate Mall, Firestone-Pk
Phone: (858) 622-0022

Young`s Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Towing, Recreational Vehicles & Campers-Repair & Service
Address: Navarro
Phone: (707) 279-0116

Xact Window Tinting ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Window Tinting, Glass-Auto, Plate, Window, Etc
Address: 181 S Wineville Ave Ste Q, Mira-Loma
Phone: (909) 605-0422

Whitaker Brake & Chassis Specialists ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Wheels-Aligning & Balancing
Address: 317 W Main St, Santa-Maria
Phone: (805) 925-3676

Auto blog

Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating

Mon, Aug 6 2018

Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.

'84 MotorWeek Cherokee, Bronco and Blazer comparison indulges your SUV nostalgia

Fri, Jan 16 2015

These days, truck-based, full-frame SUVs are somewhat of a rarity on the auto landscape due to the rapid rise in popularity of easier-driving, car-based crossovers. Although, without the gradually building popularity of these chunky, high-riding vehicles decades ago, it's unlikely that America's roads would be filled with so many CUVs today. In its latest dig into the archives, MotorWeek has found a 1984 comparison test of a trio of these early Sport Utility Wagons, as long-time host John Davis called them, that helped get acceptance of this segment going. This is a red, white and blue test of the SUVs from American automakers at the time and pits the Chevrolet Blazer, Ford Bronco and Jeep Cherokee (specifically in Wagoneer guise) against each other. Driving manners and interior usability are considered in the evaluation, but Motorweek actually takes these vehicles off road, too. Among the bigger revelations is the improvement in on-road ability in the past 30 years. While specific 0-60 times aren't given, all three models take around 10 seconds just to get to around 50 miles per hour in the 500-feet on-ramp acceleration test. Check out this clip to see just how far this segment has progressed in the past three decades or just get a blast of nostalgia from these now vintage models. News Source: MotorWeek via YouTube Chevrolet Ford Jeep SUV Off-Road Vehicles Classics Videos Ford Bronco chevy blazer

Ford-sponsored survey says a third of Brits have snapped a 'selfie' while driving [w/videos]

Fri, 08 Aug 2014

Talking on the phone while driving isn't advisable, and texting while driving is downright dangerous. Considering those truths, the fact that we even need to point this out this is incredibly disturbing: taking "selfies" while behind the wheel is exceptionally stupid. But, it's a thing that a third of 18- to 24-year-old British drivers have copped to doing, according to a new study from Ford.
Ford, through its Driving Skills for Life program, surveyed 7,000 smartphone owners from across Europe, all aged between 18 and 24, and found that young British drivers were more likely to snap a selfie while behind the wheel than their counterparts in Germany, France, Romania, Italy, Spain and Belgium.
According to the study, the average selfie takes 14 seconds, which, while traveling at 60 miles per hour, is long enough to travel over the length of nearly four football fields (the Ford study uses soccer fields, but we translated it to football, because, you know, America). That's an extremely dangerous distance to not be focused on the road.