Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2014 Ford Mustang Gt on 2040-cars

US $30,406.00
Year:2014 Mileage:22 Color: Gotta Have It Green /
 Charcoal Black
Location:

706 E Us Highway 74, Rockingham, North Carolina, United States

706 E Us Highway 74, Rockingham, North Carolina, United States
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:5.0L V8 32V MPFI DOHC
Transmission:6-Speed Manual
Condition: New
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1ZVBP8CF1E5308501
Stock Num: 9575
Make: Ford
Model: Mustang GT
Year: 2014
Exterior Color: Gotta Have It Green
Interior Color: Charcoal Black
Options:
  • 4-wheel ABS Brakes
  • ABS and Driveline Traction Control
  • Aluminum spare wheel rim
  • Audio controls on steering wheel
  • Black grille
  • Braking Assist
  • Bucket front seats
  • Cargo area light
  • Center Console: Full with locking storage
  • Clock: In-radio display
  • Coil front spring
  • Coil rear spring
  • Compass
  • Cruise control
  • Cruise controls on steering wheel
  • Curb weight: 3,618 lbs.
  • Digital Audio Input
  • Dual illuminated vanity mirrors
  • Dusk sensing headlights
  • External temperature display
  • Fold forward seatback rear seats
  • Front and rear suspension stabilizer bars
  • Front fog/driving lights
  • Front Independent Suspension
  • Front reading lights
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Capacity: 16.0 gal.
  • Fuel Consumption: City: 15 mpg
  • Fuel Consumption: Highway: 26 mpg
  • Fuel Type: Premium unleaded
  • Headlights off auto delay
  • In-Dash single CD player
  • Independent front suspension classification
  • Instrumentation: Low fuel level
  • Interior air filtration
  • Leather/aluminum steering wheel trim
  • Manual front air conditioning
  • Manufacturer's 0-60mph acceleration time (seconds): 4.7 s
  • Max cargo capacity: 13 cu.ft.
  • MP3 player
  • Multi-link rear suspension
  • Overall height: 5
  • Overall Length: 188.5"
  • Overall Width: 73.9"
  • Passenger Airbag
  • Power remote driver mirror adjustment
  • Power remote passenger mirror adjustment
  • Power remote trunk release
  • Power windows
  • Privacy glass: Light
  • Radio Data System
  • Rear bench
  • Rear spoiler: Lip
  • Rear Stabilizer Bar: Regular
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Remote activated exterior entry lights
  • Remote power door locks
  • Rigid axle rear suspension
  • Side airbag
  • Silver aluminum rims
  • Spare Tire Mount Location: Inside under cargo
  • Speed Sensitive Audio Volume Control
  • Speed-proportional electric power steering
  • Stability control
  • Strut front suspension
  • Suspension class: Regular
  • Tachometer
  • Tilt-adjustable steering wheel
  • Tire Pressure Monitoring System
  • Trip computer
  • Variable intermittent front wipers
  • Vehicle Emissions: LEV II
  • Wheel Diameter: 18
  • Wheel Width: 8
Drive Type: RWD
Number of Doors: 2 Doors
Mileage: 22

CHAMPION FORD LINCOLN, RIGHT DOWN THE ROAD FROM HIGHER PRICES!!!!!!!!!

Auto Services in North Carolina

Xpertech Car Care ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 1295 Tunnel Rd, Fletcher
Phone: (828) 298-3612

Wilmington Motor Works ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 300 Old Dairy Rd, Rocky-Point
Phone: (910) 399-1795

Wedgewood Muffler Shop ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Mufflers & Exhaust Systems
Address: 407 1/2 W Gannon Ave, Zebulon
Phone: (919) 269-6166

Vander Tire And Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories
Address: 3607 Clinton Rd, Linden
Phone: (910) 483-2585

Valvoline Instant Oil Change ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Automotive Tune Up Service
Address: 7856 Idlewild Rd, Waxhaw
Phone: (704) 882-3371

Transmedics Transmission Specialists ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission, Automobile Consultants
Address: 5211 Lacy Ave, Garner
Phone: (919) 954-8699

Auto blog

Tier 1 suppliers call GM the worst OEM to work with

Mon, 12 May 2014

Among automakers with a big US presence, General Motors is the worst to work for, according to a new survey from Tier 1 automotive suppliers, conducted by Planning Perspectives, Inc.
The Detroit-based manufacturer, which has been under fire following the ignition switch recall and its accompanying scandal, finished behind six other automakers with big US manufacturing operations. Suppliers had issues with trust and communications, as well as intellectual property protection. GM was also the least likely to allow suppliers to raise their prices in the face of unexpected increases in material cost, all of which contributed to 55 percent of suppliers saying their relationship with GM was "poor to very poor."
GM's cross-town competitors didn't fare much better. Chrysler finished in fifth place, ahead of GM and behind Dearborn-based Ford, which was passed for third place this year by Nissan. Toyota took the top marks, while Honda captured second place.

Paul and Todd from Everyday Driver | Autoblog Podcast #477

Thu, May 26 2016

Episode #477 of the Autoblog Podcast is here. This week, Dan Roth is joined by guests Paul Schmucker and Todd Deeken of Everyday Driver to talk cars, podcasting, and more. It's a freewheeling chat, and it all starts with the Autoblog Garage - check it out! Check out the rundown with times for topics, and thanks for listening! Autoblog Podcast #477 The video meant to be presented here is no longer available. Sorry for the inconvenience. Topics EveryDay Driver In The Autoblog Garage 2016 Buick Cascada Ford Mustang Boss 302 vs. Shelby GT350 Hosts: Dan Roth Guests: Paul Schmucker, Todd Deeken Total Duration: 01:08:20 Get The Podcast iTunes – Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes RSS – Add the Autoblog Podcast feed to your RSS aggregator MP3 – Download the MP3 directly Feedback Email – Podcast at Autoblog dot com Review the show in iTunes Podcasts Buick Ford buick cascada cascada

Ford not backing down on MPG-based marketing strategy

Thu, Jun 26 2014

The Blue Oval may have to back off a bit from the green messaging. Ford has had to lower fuel-economy ratings on a number of 2013 and 2014 model-year vehicles, namely its hybrids. And that may force the US automaker to rethink some of its marketing strategy, Automotive News reports. Ford has spent much of the year pushing its fuel-efficiency improvements, with everything from a Super Bowl ad saying its Fusion Hybrid gets "almost double" the fuel efficiency of an average vehicle (after the recalculation, it's now more like 75 percent better) to claiming the Fiesta is the most fuel-efficient non-hybrid in the US (it's actually the Mitsubishi Mirage) to stating the C-Max Hybrid gets better fuel economy than the Toyota Prius V (it doesn't). Nonetheless, Ford doesn't plan on changing its mpg marketing emphasis anytime soon, the company said in an e-mailed statement to AutoblogGreen. "Providing customers great fuel economy is a key part of our Ford vehicle DNA." "Providing customers great fuel economy is a key part of our Ford vehicle DNA," the company said. "We will continue to highlight our vehicles features and attributes in our advertising and marketing, which includes fuel economy and fuel-saving technologies like EcoBoost and hybrids." Earlier this month, Ford said it would lower the fuel-economy ratings of models such as the C-Max, Fusion and Lincoln MKZ Hybrids as well as most of the Fiesta line because of mistakes in the company's internal testing data. It was the second change for the C-Max Hybrid. The good news for Ford is that its fleetwide fuel economy is up almost 40 percent from a decade ago, compared to an improvement of around 23 percent for Toyota. Still, while sales of Ford hybrids and plug-ins are about even with last year through the first five months of 2014, C-Max Hybrid sales have plunged 49 percent from a year earlier. Earlier this year, Ford admitted that the first fuel economy downgrade had a negative effect on sales and we can find proof in the numbers. Before that the change was announced, in August 2013, Ford was consistently selling over 2,000 – and sometimes over 3,000 – C-Max Hybrids a month. In September, it dropped to 1,424, then to 1,438 in October. It didn't climb back above 2,000 until May 2014. The second mpg adjustment was announced in June.