2011 Gt Cs California Special 5.0 Gt Wheels Sync Htd Seats Ford Mustang 25k on 2040-cars
Alvin, Texas, United States
Engine:5.0L 4951CC 302Cu. In. V8 GAS DOHC Naturally Aspirated
For Sale By:Dealer
Body Type:Coupe
Transmission:6-Speed Manual
Fuel Type:GAS
Warranty: YES
Make: Ford
Model: Mustang
Options: LEATHER HEATED SEATS
Trim: GT Coupe 2-Door
Safety Features: SEAT BELTS HEADLIGHTS BRAKES LIGHTS TURN SIGNALS
Power Options: WINDOWS, LOCKS & CRUISE CONTROL
Drive Type: RWD
Mileage: 25903
Disability Equipped: No
Sub Model: WE FINANCE MOTOR TRENDS
NUMBER OF DOORS: 2
Exterior Color: Ingot Silver Metallic - (Silver)
Interior Color: Charcoal Black Leather
Number of Cylinders: 8
Ford Mustang for Sale
- Ford mustang gt convertible low miles performance upgrades-gorgeous
- Ford shelby gt500 mustang (loaded incl. navigation & hid headlights)
- 1966 ford mustang gt, a-code 289 v8, tremec 5-speed, rack & pinion, cali car
- 1999 mustang saleen black automatic 4.6 l n/a hardtop #145(US $12,000.00)
- 1995 ford mustang gt convertible 2-door 5.0l new top needs work runs great(US $3,000.00)
- 1991 ford mustang notchback coupe 4.6l 32v turbo swap 682 rwhp 9.89 1/4 mile e85(US $16,900.00)
Auto Services in Texas
Zepco ★★★★★
Z Max Auto ★★★★★
Young`s Trailer Sales ★★★★★
Woodys Auto Repair ★★★★★
Window Magic ★★★★★
Wichita Alignment & Brake ★★★★★
Auto blog
2016 Tech of the Year | Autoblog Minute
Thu, Oct 29 2015Deliberation on the winners of Autoblog's Tech of the Year Award is under way. Nominees for best car in 2016 are: the Tesla Model S, the Chevy Volt and the BMW 7 series. Nominees for best tech in 2016 are: Apple CarPlay, Android Auto, VW's MiB II with AppConnect, Ford Sync 3, Audi Virtual Cockpit, the Smart Cross Connect App, and Volvo Sensus. Autoblog's Chris McGraw reports on this edition of Autoblog Minute. Audi BMW Chevrolet Ford smart Tesla Volvo Technology of the Year Autoblog Minute Videos Original Video volt android auto ford sync 3
Riding along in Ford's bonkers Fiesta ST Global RallyCross car [w/video]
Wed, 28 Aug 2013
The Mountune-worked Fiesta ST GRC does 0-to-60 mph in 1.9 seconds.
On any given day, and every single weekend, there's at least one parking in the country invaded by manufacturer and team trucks. The be-chromed beasts and their 53-foot trailers are slotted into rows, men and women decorate the lot with orange cones to mark the invisible tracery of a temporary track, cars get unloaded, crews fret over them. The ritual can be as beautiful as the sunrise to those with enthusiast hearts, but it's just as common.
Ford made three big mistakes in calculating MPG for 2013 C-Max Hybrid
Tue, Jun 17 2014It's been a rough time for the official fuel economy figures for the Ford C-Max Hybrid. When the car was released in 2012, Ford made a huge deal about how it would beat the Toyota Prius V, which was rated at 42 combined miles per gallon, 44 city and 40 highway. The Ford? 47 mpg across the board. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? Well, after hearing customer complaints and issuing a software update in mid-2013, then discovering a real problem with the numbers last fall and then making a big announcement last week that the fuel economy ratings of six different 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles would need to be lowered, the C-Max Hybrid has ended up at 40 combined, 42 city and 37 highway. In other words, the Prius trumps it, as daily drivers of those two vehicles have known for a long time. The changes will not only affect the window sticker, but also the effect that the C-Max Hybrid (and the five other Ford vehicles that had their fuel economy figures lowered last week) have on Ford's compliance with greenhouse gas and CAFE rules for model year 2013 and 2014. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? There are two technical answers to that question, which we've got below, as well as some context for how Ford's mistakes will play out in the bigger world of green vehicles. Let's start with Ford's second error, which is easy to do since we documented it in detail last year (the first, needing to do a software update, was also covered). The basic gist is that Ford used the general label rule (completely legally) to test the Fusion Hybrid and use those numbers to figure out how efficient the C-Max Hybrid is. That turned out to be a mistake, since the two vehicles are different enough that their numbers were not comparable, despite having the same engine, transmission and test weight, as the rules require. You can read more details here. Ford's Said Deep admitted that the TRLHP issue is completely separate from the general label error from last year. Now let's move on to last week's announcement. What's interesting is that the new recalculation of the MPG numbers – downward, of course – was caused by a completely separate issue, something called the Total Road Load Horsepower (TRLHP). Ford's Said Deep admitted to AutoblogGreen that the TRLHP issue had nothing to do with the general label error from last year.