Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2011 Ford Mustang Gt/cs Leather Shaker 19" Wheels 35k Texas Direct Auto on 2040-cars

US $26,780.00
Year:2011 Mileage:35204 Color: Red /
 Black
Location:

Stafford, Texas, United States

Stafford, Texas, United States
Vehicle Title:Clear
For Sale By:Dealer
Engine:5.0L 4951CC 302Cu. In. V8 GAS DOHC Naturally Aspirated
Body Type:Coupe
Transmission:Automatic
Fuel Type:GAS
VIN: 1ZVBP8CF2B5142730 Year: 2011
Make: Ford
Options: Leather
Model: Mustang
Power Options: Power Seats, Power Windows, Power Locks, Cruise Control
Trim: GT Coupe 2-Door
Number of Doors: 2
Drive Type: RWD
CALL NOW: 832-947-9946
Mileage: 35,204
Inspection: Vehicle has been inspected
Sub Model: WE FINANCE!!
Seller Rating: 5 STAR *****
Exterior Color: Red
Interior Color: Black
Number of Cylinders: 8
Warranty: Vehicle has an existing warranty
Condition: Certified pre-owned: To qualify for certified pre-owned status, vehicles must meet strict age, mileage, and inspection requirements established by their manufacturers. Certified pre-owned cars are often sold with warranty, financing and roadside assistance options similar to their new counterparts. See the seller's listing for full details. ... 

Auto Services in Texas

Xtreme Customs Body and Paint ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 4524 Dyer St, Tornillo
Phone: (915) 584-1560

Woodard Paint & Body ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 3515 Ross Ave, Dfw
Phone: (214) 821-3310

Whitlock Auto Kare & Sale ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers
Address: 1325 Whitlock Ln 205, Shady-Shores
Phone: (972) 242-5454

Wesley Chitty Garage-Body Shop ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 805 W Frank St, Van
Phone: (903) 962-3819

Weathersbee Electric Co ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Electric Service
Address: 7 E Highland Blvd, San-Angelo
Phone: (325) 655-7555

Wayside Radiator Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Radiators Automotive Sales & Service
Address: 1815 Wayside Dr, Pasadena
Phone: (713) 923-4122

Auto blog

Auto industry insider previews tell-all book, What Did Jesus Drive?

Tue, 11 Nov 2014



"It's about some of the biggest crises in history. It's about who did it right and who did it wrong." - Jason Vines
Jason Vines, the former head of public relations at Chrysler, Ford and Nissan, has seen a lot during his more than 30-year career, and now he's offering a behind-the-scenes look at the auto industry in his tell-all book What Did Jesus Drive? that went on sale this month.

Top torque-to-weight ratios under $100k, $50k and $25k

Tue, 07 Oct 2014

Horsepower may steal a lot of headlines, but the always-more-complex torque figure is often a critical one for both the workingman and the motoring playboy. The measure of rotational force represents the twist that can liquefy one's tires or haul one's horse trailer. Good stuff.
It follows then, that as with the horsepower-to-weight list that we assembled for you a few months ago, a list of cars that offer the most pound-feet with the fewest pounds to carry, is an interesting one to break down. Sure, there's a big difference in how the torque is applied from a turbocharged six-cylinder in a Swedish luxury sedan and a massive heavy-duty truck's turbo-diesel. But being the car/stat geeks that we are, we think it's kinda neat that those two vehicles rank near each other where torque and weight intersect.
As with the horsepower list, we've given you figures as pounds per every one pound-foot. Again broken down into broad price categories, we've got a mixed bag of 2014 and 2015 models here, too. Every effort has been made to select the most up-to-date prices and specs, and we've also to omitted some '14 cars that won't be re-upped after the ongoing yearly changeover.

Ford made three big mistakes in calculating MPG for 2013 C-Max Hybrid

Tue, Jun 17 2014

It's been a rough time for the official fuel economy figures for the Ford C-Max Hybrid. When the car was released in 2012, Ford made a huge deal about how it would beat the Toyota Prius V, which was rated at 42 combined miles per gallon, 44 city and 40 highway. The Ford? 47 mpg across the board. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? Well, after hearing customer complaints and issuing a software update in mid-2013, then discovering a real problem with the numbers last fall and then making a big announcement last week that the fuel economy ratings of six different 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles would need to be lowered, the C-Max Hybrid has ended up at 40 combined, 42 city and 37 highway. In other words, the Prius trumps it, as daily drivers of those two vehicles have known for a long time. The changes will not only affect the window sticker, but also the effect that the C-Max Hybrid (and the five other Ford vehicles that had their fuel economy figures lowered last week) have on Ford's compliance with greenhouse gas and CAFE rules for model year 2013 and 2014. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? There are two technical answers to that question, which we've got below, as well as some context for how Ford's mistakes will play out in the bigger world of green vehicles. Let's start with Ford's second error, which is easy to do since we documented it in detail last year (the first, needing to do a software update, was also covered). The basic gist is that Ford used the general label rule (completely legally) to test the Fusion Hybrid and use those numbers to figure out how efficient the C-Max Hybrid is. That turned out to be a mistake, since the two vehicles are different enough that their numbers were not comparable, despite having the same engine, transmission and test weight, as the rules require. You can read more details here. Ford's Said Deep admitted that the TRLHP issue is completely separate from the general label error from last year. Now let's move on to last week's announcement. What's interesting is that the new recalculation of the MPG numbers – downward, of course – was caused by a completely separate issue, something called the Total Road Load Horsepower (TRLHP). Ford's Said Deep admitted to AutoblogGreen that the TRLHP issue had nothing to do with the general label error from last year.