2010 Ford Mustang Gt 5spd Leather Spoiler Only 25k Mi!! Texas Direct Auto on 2040-cars
Stafford, Texas, United States
Engine:4.6L 281Cu. In. V8 GAS SOHC Naturally Aspirated
For Sale By:Dealer
Body Type:Coupe
Transmission:Manual
Fuel Type:GAS
Make: Ford
Options: Leather, CD Player
Model: Mustang
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Side Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Trim: GT Coupe 2-Door
Power Options: Power Windows, Power Locks, Cruise Control
Drive Type: RWD
Number Of Doors: 2
Mileage: 25,393
CALL NOW: 832-310-2229
Sub Model: WE FINANCE!!
Inspection: Vehicle has been inspected
Exterior Color: Silver
Seller Rating: 5 STAR *****
Interior Color: Gray
Number of Cylinders: 8
Warranty: Vehicle has an existing warranty
Ford Mustang for Sale
- 2007 ford mustang premium convertible auto leather 27k! texas direct auto(US $14,980.00)
- We finance!! 2010 ford mustang gt premium 5-speed microsoft sync 19 rims shaker(US $22,998.00)
- 2010 ford mustang gt premium comfort 5spd leather 12k! texas direct auto(US $23,980.00)
- We finance!!! 2008 ford mustang gt premium convertible 5-speed rspoiler shaker(US $21,488.00)
- 2011 ford mustang gt premium 5.0 6 speed glassback 17k! texas direct auto(US $26,980.00)
- 2008 ford mustang gt premium 5-spd leather spoiler 28k! texas direct auto(US $19,480.00)
Auto Services in Texas
Zeke`s Inspections Plus ★★★★★
Value Import ★★★★★
USA Car Care ★★★★★
USA Auto ★★★★★
Uresti Jesse Camper Sales ★★★★★
Universal Village Auto Inc ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford sued over alleged 3.5-liter EcoBoost defects
Thu, 16 May 2013Three Ford owners from Ohio have filed a lawsuit against the automaker over defects that they allege exist within the company's twin-turbocharged 3.5-liter V6 EcoBoost engine. Automotive News reports that the lawsuit claims the engine "contained serious latent design, manufacturing, or assembly defects." Those defects, the suit claims, cause the vehicle to shake, misfire and lose power quickly.
Two of the plaintiffs, a married couple, own a 2010 Ford Taurus SHO, and allege they experienced a loss of power and stalling, while the third, an F-150 owner, claims he lost power while accelerating. In addition to the Taurus SHO and F-150, the 3.5-liter V6 EcoBoost engine is also available in the Ford Flex, Explorer Sport and Lincoln MKT and MKS. Other three- and four-cylinder EcoBoost engines are not included in the suit. There have been no recalls associated with 3.5-liter V6 engine, and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is currently not investigating the matter.
The plaintiffs, however, claim Ford has known about the problem, citing several technical service bulletins issued to dealers of the F-150 that suggest possible fixes. Ford had no comment for Automotive News, saying that it's yet to review the lawsuit, which was filed last Friday in Columbus, OH.
Autoblog Podcast #327
Tue, 02 Apr 2013New York Auto Show, Jim Farley interview, 2014 Chevrolet Silverado fuel economy, Ford fuel economy app challenge
Episode #327 of the Autoblog Podcast is here, and this week, Dan Roth, Zach Bowman and Jeff Ross talk about this year's New York Auto Show, Chevrolet's latest assault in the pickup truck fuel economy battle, and Ford's reward for developing a better fuel economy app. Dan also has an interview with Ford's Jim Farley about the future of Lincoln. We wrap with your questions and emails, and for those of you who hung with us live on our UStream channel, thanks for taking the time. Keep reading for our Q&A module for you to scroll through and follow along, too. Thanks for listening!
Autoblog Podcast #327:
Ford files trademark application for 'Model E'
Fri, 27 Dec 2013In early December, Ford filed an application with the US Patent and Trademark Office for the name "Model E." Historically, Ford never produced a Model E, and while automakers are known to file for trademarks they never use, some have wondered if the application might be used for a concept car.
Based on other recent events, though, it could be a legal move. In 2000 Ford sued an online start-up called Model E over the similarity of that name to Ford's industry-shaping Model T, but the judge dismissed the case citing lack of proper grounds. In August 2013, Tesla applied for trademark registration for Model E, and at the time, Ford said it would review the application. Tesla actually made two applications for Model E, one for automobiles and structural parts therefore, the other for "providing maintenance and repair services for automobiles," and there are plenty of theories about what the name could be applied to.
The Published for Opposition date for Tesla's applications is December 31, 2013, after which anyone who thinks they'd be harmed by Tesla being granted the trademark gets 30 days to register their issues. This is just speculation, but Ford's application - which was filed for automobiles only - might be about protecting what it sees as unwelcome encroachment on the name Model T, protection it wasn't able to enforce before when the stakes were only online and much smaller.