Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2004 Ford Mustang 1 Owner Like New Premium Fully Serviced on 2040-cars

US $8,900.00
Year:2004 Mileage:79144 Color: Silver /
 Gray
Location:

Pompano Beach, Florida, United States

Pompano Beach, Florida, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Vehicle Title:Clear
For Sale By:Dealer
Engine:3.8L 232Cu. In. V6 GAS OHV Naturally Aspirated
Body Type:Convertible
Fuel Type:GAS
VIN: 1FAFP44604F194291 Year: 2004
Make: Ford
Model: Mustang
Trim: Base Convertible 2-Door
Disability Equipped: No
Doors: 2
Drive Type: RWD
Drivetrain: Rear Wheel Drive
Mileage: 79,144
Number of Doors: 2
Sub Model: 2dr Convertible 1 Owner
Exterior Color: Silver
Number of Cylinders: 6
Interior Color: Gray
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

Auto Services in Florida

Workman Service Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 2947 Gulf Breeze Pkwy, Gulf-Breeze
Phone: (850) 932-3239

Wolf Towing Corp. ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Towing, Transportation Services
Address: Sun-City-Center
Phone: (813) 928-9389

Wilcox & Son Automotive, LLC ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 62 W. Illiana Street Suite C, Windermere
Phone: (407) 440-2848

Wheaton`s Service Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Towing, Tire Dealers
Address: Grassy-Key
Phone: (305) 451-3500

Used Car Super Market ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 3120 W Tennessee St, Ochlockonee-Bay
Phone: (850) 575-6702

USA Auto Glass ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories, Windshield Repair
Address: 30000 S Dixie Hwy, Sunny-Isles-Beach
Phone: (305) 247-9100

Auto blog

Ford Mustang Mach-E fails Sweden's moose test

Wed, Sep 29 2021

The infamous moose test has claimed another casualty. This time it's the Ford Mustang Mach-E AWD Long Range, which was tested in an electric four-way alongside the Tesla Model Y, Hyundai Ioniq 5 and Skoda Enyaq iV (an electric utility vehicle closely related to the Volkswagen ID.4 that is sold in the United States). According to the Swedish testers at Teknikens Varld, Ford's electric car not only failed to hit the speed necessary for a passing grade, it didn't perform well at slower speeds, either. To pass the outlet's moose test, a car has to complete a rapid left-right-straight S-shaped pattern marked by cones at a speed of at least 72 km/h (44.7 miles per hour). The test is designed to mimic the type of avoidance maneuver a driver would have to take in order to avoid hitting something that wandered into the road, which in Sweden may be a moose but could just as easily be a deer or some other member of the animal kingdom elsewhere in the world, or possibly a child or car backing into the motorway. Not only is the maneuver very aggressive, it's also performed with weights belted into each seat and more weight added to the cargo area to hit the vehicle's maximum allowable carrying capacity. The Mustang Mach-E only managed to complete the moose test at 68 km/h (42.3 mph), well below the passing-grade threshold. Even at much lower speeds, Teknikens Varld says the Mach-E (which boasts the highest carrying capacity and was therefore loaded with more weight than the rest of the vehicles tested in this quartet) is "too soft in the chassis" and suffers from "too slow steering." Proving that it is indeed possible to pass the test, the Hyundai and Skoda completed the maneuver at the 44.7-mph figure required for a passing grade and the Tesla did it at 46.6 mph, albeit with less weight in the cargo area. It's not clear whether other versions of the Mustang Mach-E would pass the test. It's also unknown if Ford will make any changes to its chassis tuning or electronic stability control software, as some other automakers have done after a poor performance from Teknikens Varld, to improve its performance in the moose test. Related video:

Nuclear-powered concept cars from the Atomic Age

Thu, 17 Jul 2014

In the 1950s and early 60s, the dawn of nuclear power was supposed to lead to a limitless consumer culture, a world of flying cars and autonomous kitchens all powered by clean energy. In Europe, it offered the then-limping continent a cheap, inexhaustible supply of power after years of rationing and infrastructure damage brought on by two World Wars.
The development of nuclear-powered submarines and ships during the 1940s and 50s led car designers to begin conceptualizing atomic vehicles. Fueled by a consistent reaction, these cars would theoretically produce no harmful byproducts and rarely need to refuel. Combining these vehicles with the new interstate system presented amazing potential for American mobility.
But the fantasy soon faded. There were just too many problems with the realities of nuclear power. For starters, the powerplant would be too small to attain a reaction unless the car contained weapons-grade atomic materials. Doing so would mean every fender-bender could result in a minor nuclear holocaust. Additionally, many of the designers assumed a lightweight shielding material or even forcefields would eventually be invented (they still haven't) to protect passengers from harmful radiation. Analyses of the atomic car concept at the time determined that a 50-ton lead barrier would be necessary to prevent exposure.

2014 Ford Fiesta 1.0L EcoBoost

Fri, 09 May 2014

I'll be honest; when Ford first unveiled its 3.5-liter EcoBoost V6, I was skeptical. Past attempts at building turbocharged American cars were almost universally awful, I reasoned, so why would Ford's latest effort be any different? This may seem foolish today, considering the success that the growing EcoBoost range has achieved - particularly the 2.0-liter and 1.6-liter mills. Yet I once again found myself questioning Ford.
It's the makeup of the 1.0-liter, turbocharged three-cylinder slotted into the compact engine bay of this Fiesta that has a way of breeding doubt. Three-cylinder engines remain an extreme rarity in the US. What's more, they earned a less-than-desirable reputation for applications in the 1980s and 1990s, and my trepidation about this latest three-pot as a result.
As I found out, though, history is a poor informant of modern technology. The thrust available in other cars with the EcoBoost badge on the back has not gone missing here; something the International Engine of the Year committee has lauded. That august body named the 1.0-liter Ecoboost the best engine of 2012 and 2013. After a week of driving, it didn't take long for my fear of threes to get turned into something like that line of thinking.